Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence. Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meetsWiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
All of them lack citations. I have only ever seen the pronouns "gi" and "geli" in proposals and never in actual usage. Maybe they should be removed from the Wikipedia pages too, if they can't be cited. That sense of "ĝi" is really uncommon, and I wonder if it can be cited. The pronouns "ŝli" and "ri" can probably be cited.Robin van der Vliet(talk)(contribs)12:28, 3 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
I noticed this discussion because a quotation was added toĝi, but I don't think it unambiguously supports this sense—theĝi in that quotation seems to refer back to the wordestaĵo—so while the sentence is a little unusual, it is easily explained as a use of the standard sense ofĝi.
Ŝli is the only one of these that I've encountered "in the wild" (outside of dictionaries and discussions of grammar), so I'm glad it has been adequately cited. I'm busy with other projects at the moment, so I don't want to spend the time hunting for citations for the other pronouns. I doubtgeli orhi can be cited anyway.Ĝi might be citeable but quotations of this extremely rare sense must be like aneedle in a haystack. —Granger (talk·contribs)12:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
