 | ThisProto-Indo-European entry containsreconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directlyattested, but are hypothesized to have existed based oncomparative evidence. |
From*-h₂.
*-éh₂ n
This collective noun suffix gave rise to the thematic neuter plural suffix in nuclear (i.e. non-Anatolian) Indo-European languages. In Anatolian itself, it is disputed whether nouns attested with this suffix are plural or collective in number.
*(o)-éh₂ f
These o-grade feminine abstract nouns are known asτομή(tomḗ)-type nouns in Indo-Europeanist literature, and were typically derived from*(o)-ós nominals from*CeR- roots.
| Thematic in*-eh₂ | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| singular | |||
| nominative | *(o)-éh₂ | ||
| genitive | *(o)-éh₂s | ||
| singular | dual | plural | |
| nominative | *(o)-éh₂ | *(o)-éh₂h₁(e) | *(o)-éh₂es |
| vocative | *(o)-éh₂ | *(o)-éh₂h₁(e) | *(o)-éh₂es |
| accusative | *(o)-ā́m | *(o)-éh₂h₁(e) | *(o)-éh₂m̥s |
| genitive | *(o)-éh₂s | *? | *(o)-éh₂oHom |
| ablative | *(o)-éh₂s | *? | *(o)-éh₂mos,*(o)-éh₂bʰos |
| dative | *(o)-éh₂ey | *? | *(o)-éh₂mos,*(o)-éh₂bʰos |
| locative | *(o)-éh₂,*(o)-éh₂i | *? | *(o)-éh₂su |
| instrumental | *(o)-éh₂h₁ | *? | *(o)-éh₂mis,*(o)-éh₂bʰis |
*(∅)-éh₂ f
These nouns are known asφυγή(phugḗ)-type nouns in Indo-Europeanist literature. They are mainly formed from verbal roots, generally of the shape*CeRT-.
| Thematic in*-eh₂ | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| singular | |||
| nominative | *(∅)-éh₂ | ||
| genitive | *(∅)-éh₂s | ||
| singular | dual | plural | |
| nominative | *(∅)-éh₂ | *(∅)-éh₂h₁(e) | *(∅)-éh₂es |
| vocative | *(∅)-éh₂ | *(∅)-éh₂h₁(e) | *(∅)-éh₂es |
| accusative | *(∅)-ā́m | *(∅)-éh₂h₁(e) | *(∅)-éh₂m̥s |
| genitive | *(∅)-éh₂s | *? | *(∅)-éh₂oHom |
| ablative | *(∅)-éh₂s | *? | *(∅)-éh₂mos,*(∅)-éh₂bʰos |
| dative | *(∅)-éh₂ey | *? | *(∅)-éh₂mos,*(∅)-éh₂bʰos |
| locative | *(∅)-éh₂,*(∅)-éh₂i | *? | *(∅)-éh₂su |
| instrumental | *(∅)-éh₂h₁ | *? | *(∅)-éh₂mis,*(∅)-éh₂bʰis |