Inabstract algebra, anelementa of aringR is called aleft zero divisor if there exists a nonzerox inR such thatax = 0,[1] or equivalently if themap fromR toR that sendsx toax is notinjective.[a] Similarly, an elementa of a ring is called aright zero divisor if there exists a nonzeroy inR such thatya = 0. This is a partial case ofdivisibility in rings. An element that is a left or a right zero divisor is simply called azero divisor.[2] An element a that is both a left and a right zero divisor is called atwo-sided zero divisor (the nonzerox such thatax = 0 may be different from the nonzeroy such thatya = 0). If the ring iscommutative, then the left and right zero divisors are the same.
An element of a ring that is not a left zero divisor (respectively, not a right zero divisor) is calledleft regular orleft cancellable (respectively,right regular orright cancellable).An element of a ring that is left and right cancellable, and is hence not a zero divisor, is calledregular orcancellable,[3] or anon-zero-divisor. (N.B.: In "non-zero-divisor", the prefix "non-" is understood to modify "zero-divisor" as a whole rather than just the word "zero". In some texts, "zero divisor" is written as "zerodivisor" and "non-zero-divisor" as "nonzerodivisor"[4] or "non-zerodivisor"[5] for clarity.) A zero divisor that is nonzero is called anonzero zero divisor or anontrivial zero divisor. A non-zero ring with no nontrivial zero divisors is called adomain.
Anilpotent element of a nonzero ring is always a two-sided zero divisor.
Anidempotent element of a ring is always a two-sided zero divisor, since.
Thering ofn ×n matrices over afield has nonzero zero divisors ifn ≥ 2. Examples of zero divisors in the ring of 2 × 2matrices (over any nonzero ring) are shown here:
Adirect product of two or more nonzero rings always has nonzero zero divisors. For example, in with each nonzero,, so is a zero divisor.
Let be a field and be agroup. Suppose that has an element of finiteorder. Then in thegroup ring one has, with neither factor being zero, so is a nonzero zero divisor in.
Consider the ring of (formal) matrices with and. Then and. If, then is a left zero divisorif and only if iseven, since, and it is a right zero divisor if and only if is even for similar reasons. If either of is, then it is a two-sided zero-divisor.
Here is another example of a ring with an element that is a zero divisor on one side only. Let be theset of allsequences of integers. Take for the ring alladditive maps from to, withpointwise addition andcomposition as the ring operations. (That is, our ring is, theendomorphism ring of the additive group.) Three examples of elements of this ring are theright shift, theleft shift, and theprojection map onto the first factor. All three of these additive maps are not zero, and the composites and are both zero, so is a left zero divisor and is a right zero divisor in the ring of additive maps from to. However, is not a right zero divisor and is not a left zero divisor: the composite is the identity. is a two-sided zero-divisor since, while is not in any direction.
In the ring ofn ×n matrices over a field, the left and right zero divisors coincide; they are precisely thesingular matrices. In the ring ofn ×n matrices over anintegral domain, the zero divisors are precisely the matrices withdeterminant zero.
Left or right zero divisors can never beunits, because ifa is invertible andax = 0 for some nonzerox, then0 =a−10 =a−1ax =x, a contradiction.
An element iscancellable on the side on which it is regular. That is, ifa is a left regular,ax =ay implies thatx =y, and similarly for right regular.
There is no need for a separate convention for the casea = 0, because the definition applies also in this case:
IfR is a ring other than thezero ring, then0 is a (two-sided) zero divisor, because any nonzero elementx satisfies0x = 0 =x 0.
IfR is the zero ring, in which0 = 1, then0 is not a zero divisor, because there is nononzero element that when multiplied by0 yields0.
Some references include or exclude0 as a zero divisor inall rings by convention, but they then suffer from having to introduce exceptions in statements such as the following:
In a commutative ringR, the set of non-zero-divisors is amultiplicative set inR. (This, in turn, is important for the definition of thetotal quotient ring.) The same is true of the set of non-left-zero-divisors and the set of non-right-zero-divisors in an arbitrary ring, commutative or not.
LetR be a commutative ring, letM be anR-module, and leta be an element ofR. One says thata isM-regular if the "multiplication bya" map is injective, and thata is azero divisor onM otherwise.[6] The set ofM-regular elements is amultiplicative set inR.[6]
Specializing the definitions of "M-regular" and "zero divisor onM" to the caseM =R recovers the definitions of "regular" and "zero divisor" given earlier in this article.
^Reid, Miles (1995).Undergraduate commutative algebra. London Mathematical Society student texts. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0-521-45255-7.
^abHideyuki Matsumura (1980),Commutative algebra, 2nd edition, The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., p. 12