The termzealot, the common translation of theHebrewkanai (קנאי, frequently used in plural form,קנאים,kana'im), means one who is zealous on behalf of God. The term derives fromGreekζηλωτής (zelotes), "emulator, zealous admirer or follower".[1][2]
Josephus'Jewish Antiquities[3] states that there were three main Jewish sects at this time, thePharisees, theSadducees, and theEssenes. The Zealots were a "fourth sect", founded byJudas of Galilee (also called Judas of Gamala) in 6 CE against theCensus of Quirinius, shortly after theRoman Empire declared what had most recently been thetetrarchy of Herod Archelaus to be aRoman province. According to Josephus, they "agree in all other things with the Pharisaic notions; but they have an inviolable attachment to liberty, and say that God is to be their only Ruler and Lord." (18.1.6)
Judah of Gaulanitis is regarded as the founder of the Zealots, who are identified as the proponents of the Fourth Philosophy. In the original sources, however, no such identification is anywhere clearly made, and the question is hardly raised of the relationship between the Sicarii, the upholders of the Fourth Philosophy, and the Zealots. Josephus himself in his general survey of the various groups of freedom fighters (War 7:268–70) enumerates the Sicarii first, whereas he mentions the Zealots last.
Others have also argued that the group was not so clearly marked out (before the first war of 66–70/3) as some have thought.[5]
The Zealots took a leading role in theFirst Jewish–Roman War (66–73 CE), as they objected to Roman rule and violently sought to eradicate it by indiscriminately attacking Romans and Greeks. Another group, likely related, were theSicarii, who raided Jewish settlements and killed Jews they consideredapostates and collaborators, while also urging Jews to fight the Romans and other Jews for the cause. Josephus paints a very bleak picture of their activities as they instituted what he characterized as a murderous "reign of terror" prior to theJewish Temple's destruction. According to Josephus, the Zealots followedJohn of Gischala, who had fought the Romans inGalilee, escaped, came to Jerusalem, and then inspired the locals to a fanatical position that led to the Temple's destruction. They succeeded in taking overJerusalem and held it until 70, when the son of Roman EmperorVespasian,Titus, retook the city and destroyedHerod's Temple during thedestruction of Jerusalem.[citation needed]
In theTalmud, the Zealots are characterized as non-religious, that is not following the contemporary religious leadership. They are called theBiryonim (בריונים) meaning "boorish", "wild", or "ruffians", and are condemned for their aggression, their unwillingness to compromise to save the survivors of besieged Jerusalem, and their blind militarism in opposition to the rabbis' desire to seek a peace treaty with Rome. However, according to one body of tradition, the rabbis initially supported the revolt until the Zealots instigated a civil war, at which point all hope of resisting the Romans was deemed impossible.[9]
The Zealots are further blamed for having contributed to the demise of Jerusalem and the Second Temple, and of ensuring Rome's retribution and stranglehold on Judea. According to theBabylonian Talmud,Gittin:56b, theBiryonim destroyed decades' worth of food and firewood in besieged Jerusalem to force the Jews to fight the Romans out of desperation. This event precipitated the escape ofJohanan ben Zakai and his meeting withVespasian, which led to the foundation of theAcademy of Jamnia and the composition of theMishnah, ensuring the survival ofrabbinical Judaism.[10][11]
The Sicarii were a splinter group of the Jewish Zealots who, in the decades preceding Jerusalem's destruction in 70 CE, strongly opposed the Roman occupation of Judea and attempted to expel them and their sympathizers from the area.[12] The Sicarii carriedsicae, or smalldaggers, concealed in their cloaks.[13] At public gatherings, they pulled out these daggers to attack Romans and alleged Roman sympathizers alike, blending into the crowd after the deed to escape detection.
According to historianHayim Hillel Ben-Sasson, the Sicarii, originally based in Galilee, "were fighting for a social revolution, while the Jerusalem Zealots placed less stress on the social aspect," and the Sicarii "never attached themselves to one particular family and never proclaimed any of their leaders king". Both groups objected to the way the priestly families were running the Temple.[8]
While mostEnglish translations of the Bible render the Greek wordzelotes inActs 22:3 andGalatians 1:13-14 and Philippians 3:5-6 of theNew Testament as the adjective "zealous", an article by Mark R. Fairchild[14] takes it to mean a Zealot and suggests thatPaul the Apostle may have been a Zealot, which might have been the driving force behind his persecution of the Christians (see the stoning ofSaint Stephen) before hisconversion to Christianity, and theincident at Antioch, even after his conversion. While Paul was not formally part of the Zealot movement—focused on violent resistance to Roman rule, his pre-conversion actions reflect a similar fervor for preserving Jewish purity and traditions. This zeal may also explain his later confrontations, such as the incident at Antioch, even after his conversion[15][16][17]
In the two cited verses Paul literally declares himself as one who isloyal to God, or anardent observer of the Law according to the Douay-Rheims of Acts 22:3, but the relationship ofPaul the Apostle and Jewish Christianity is still debated. This does not necessarily prove Paul was revealing himself as a Zealot. TheModern King James Version ofJay P. Green renders it as 'a zealous one'. Two modern translations (theJewish New Testament andAlternate Literal Translation) render it as 'a zealot'. TheUnvarnished New Testament (1991) renders Galatians 1:14 as "being an absolute zealot for the traditions".