Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Xenacoelomorpha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Phylum of animals

Xenacoelomorpha
Xenoturbella japonica, a xenacoelomorph member (xenoturbellids)
Proporus sp., another xenacoelomorph member (acoelomorphs)
Scientific classificationEdit this classification
Kingdom:Animalia
Subkingdom:Eumetazoa
Clade:ParaHoxozoa
Clade:Bilateria
Phylum:Xenacoelomorpha
Philippe et al. 2011[1]
Subdivisions

Current classification:

Traditional classification:

Xenacoelomorpha (/ˌzɛnəˌsɛlˈmɔːrfə/) is a small phylum ofbilaterianinvertebrateanimals, consisting of twosister groups:xenoturbellids andacoelomorphs. This new phylum was named in February 2011 and suggested based on morphologicalsynapomorphies (physical appearances shared by the animals in theclade),[2] which was then confirmed byphylogenomic analyses of molecular data (similarities in the DNA of the animals within the clade).[3][4]

Phylogenetics

[edit]

Prior to molecular studies, xenacoelomorphs were considered to beflatworms based on their superficial similarities. Like flatworms, they do not have a coelom and aredorsoventrally flattened.[5] With the advent ofphylogenetics,Xenoturbella and Acoelomorpha were found to be sister groups and only distantly related to flatworms.[4] Initially, thisphylum was considered to be a member of thedeuterostomes,[3] but because of recenttranscriptome analyses, it was concluded that the phylum Xenacoelomorpha is the sister group to theNephrozoa, which includes both theprotostomes and the deuterostomes, making the phylum thebasalmost bilaterian clade.[6][7] This would mean they are neither deuterostomes nor protostomes.

Bilateria

Their larvae show similarities withcnidarianplanula larvae and poriferan parenchyma larvae, but it is not clear if the similarities are ancestral or derived.[8]

However, some studies point out that their basal placement may be caused by highmutation rates leading tolong branch attraction (LBA). These analyses suggest that the xenacoelomorphs are instead the sister group ofAmbulacraria, forming the cladeXenambulacraria, and that despite their simple body plans, they actually derive from a more complex ancestor.[9][10] Having a larger number of species within this group would allow for better conclusions and analysis to be made within the phylum and in groups closely related to the phylum.

Bilateria

Internal phylogeny

[edit]

For multiple decades, the genusXenoturbella contained only one species,X. bocki. In 2016, however, a team reported the discovery of four new species from theGulf of California and sequenced each new species'mitogenome and, upon analysis, found that the two species that lived in shallow water (X. bocki andX. hollandorum) formed a "shallow" clade and that three deep water species formed a "deep" clade.[11] The following year, another team discovered a sixth species,X. japonica, found off the coast of Japan. Their phylogenetic analysis confirmed the first team's hypothesis and placedX. japonica within the shallow clade.[12]

The other two groups,Nemertodermatida andAcoela, have less clear relationships as species-level phylogenies have not been conducted. Nemertodermatida only has two families and six total genera.Ascopariidae contains two of these genera, whileNemertodermatidae has the other four. A 2016 study analyzed three of the four Nemertodermatid genera and found thatSterreria andMeara are closer to each other than toNemertoderma, whileNemertinoides was left unplaced.[6] Acoela phylogeny is even less certain, as it is by far the most diverse part of the phylum and is very understudied. A 2011 study attempted to solve this problem and recovered numerous traditional families aspolyphyletic. They also recovered a tentative clade of various species fromActinoposthiidae andIsodiametridae, which is not shown in the cladogram below.[13] Several small basal families were not included in their study, and their position is still uncertain.


Xenacoelomorpha

Characteristics

[edit]

The phylum consists of small, flat, and worm-like creatures found inmarine and sometimesbrackish waterenvironments, on thesediments. There are species that are variously free-living,parasitic, andsymbiotic. They can be found at depths of almost 4 km (2.5 mi) and nearhydrothermal vents.

The phylum ishermaphroditic (all individuals have both male and female sex organs) and reproducessexually withdirect development, meaning they skip a potentially vulnerablelarval stage.Xenoturbella has external fertilization, and Acoelomorpha has internal fertilization.[14][15][16] All xenacoelomorphs are bilateral, meaning they have a central front-to-back body axis with mirror-image right and left sides. They aretriploblasts (meaning they have the threegerm layers:ectoderm,endoderm, andmesoderm). Theirbody plan isacoelomate – they lack acoelom – do not have a true body cavity. Also, an excretory system is absent, yet all genes related to the excretory system are present except for Osr, which is essential for the development of such a system. In acoelomorphs, which have gone through rapid evolutionary rates and chromosomal rearrangements, about 60% of the genes shared between protostomes and deuterostomes are missing. How many of these genes, which are present or absent in Xenoturbella, will require whole-genome sequencing.[17]

While other animals that arediploblastic (only have two germ layers: ectoderm and endoderm) also lack a coelom, those technically do not have anacoelomate body plan because they lack the mesoderm germ layer. Inacoels, the mouth opens directly into a large endodermalsyncytium, while innemertodermatids and xenoturbellids, there is a sack-like gut lined by unciliated cells.[18]

A defining feature is a digestive system lacking nerve cells. Because anenteric nervous system, also called the stomatogastric nervous system, is also found in many cnidarians, its absence is most likely a derived trait.[19]

Their nervous systems arebasiepidermal – located right under theepidermis – and they have no brain. The xenoturbellids' nervous system consists of a simplenerve net, with no special concentration of neurons. In acoelomorphs, the nervous system is arranged in a series of longitudinal bundles, united in the anterior region by a ring comissure of variable complexity.[20]

The sensory organs include astatocyst (for balance). Some groups have two unicellularocelli (simple eyes).[18][20]

The epidermis of all species within the phylum is ciliated. Thecilia are composed of a set of nine pairs of peripheralmicrotubules and one or two central microtubules (patterns 9+1 and 9+2, respectively). The pairs 4–7 terminate before the tip, creating a structure called a "shelf".[21]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Tyler, S.; Schilling, S.; Hooge, M.; Bush, L.F. (2006–2016)."Xenacoelomorpha".Turbellarian taxonomic database. Version 1.7. Archived fromthe original on 9 February 2019. Retrieved3 February 2016.
  2. ^Lundin, K (1998). "The epidermal ciliary rootlets ofXenoturbella bocki (Xenoturbellida) revisited: new support for a possible kinship with the Acoelomorpha (Platyhelminthes)".Zoologica Scripta.27 (3):263–270.doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.1998.tb00440.x.S2CID 85324766.
  3. ^abPhilippe, H.; Brinkmann, H.; Copley, R. R.; Moroz, L. L.; Nakano, H.; Poustka, A. J.; Wallberg, A.; Peterson, K. J.; Telford, M. J. (10 February 2011)."Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related toXenoturbella".Nature.470 (7333):255–258.Bibcode:2011Natur.470..255P.doi:10.1038/nature09676.PMC 4025995.PMID 21307940.
  4. ^abHejnol, A.; Obst, M.; Stamatakis, A.; Ott, M.; Rouse, G. W.; Edgecombe, G. D.; et al. (2009)."Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods".Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.276 (1677):4261–4270.doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0896.PMC 2817096.PMID 19759036.
  5. ^Nakano, Hiroaki (2015)."What isXenoturbella?".Zoological Letters.1 (22) 22.doi:10.1186/s40851-015-0018-z.PMC 4657256.PMID 26605067.
  6. ^abPerseke, M.; Hankeln, T.; Weich, B.; Fritzsch, G.; Stadler, P.F.; Israelsson, O.; Bernhard, D.; Schlegel, M. (August 2007)."The mitochondrial DNA of Xenoturbella bocki: genomic architecture and phylogenetic analysis"(PDF).Theory Biosci.126 (1):35–42.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.177.8060.doi:10.1007/s12064-007-0007-7.PMID 18087755.S2CID 17065867. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 24 April 2019. Retrieved10 December 2013.
  7. ^Cannon, J.T.; Vellutini, B.C.; Smith, J.; Ronquist, F.; Jondelius, U.; Hejnol, A. (4 February 2016)."Xenacoelomorpha is the sister group to Nephrozoa".Nature.530 (7588):89–93.Bibcode:2016Natur.530...89C.doi:10.1038/nature16520.PMID 26842059.S2CID 205247296.
  8. ^Nakano, Hiroaki; Lundin, Kennet; Bourlat, Sarah J.; Telford, Maximilian J.; Funch, Peter; Nyengaard, Jens R.; Obst, Matthias; Thorndyke, Michael C. (2013)."Xenoturbella bocki exhibits direct development with similarities to Acoelomorpha".Nature Communications.4 1537.Bibcode:2013NatCo...4.1537N.doi:10.1038/ncomms2556.PMC 3586728.PMID 23443565.
  9. ^Philippe, Hervé; et al. (2019). "Mitigating Anticipated Effects of Systematic Errors Supports Sister-Group Relationship between Xenacoelomorpha and Ambulacraria".Current Biology.29 (11): 1818–1826.e6.Bibcode:2019CBio...29E1818P.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.009.hdl:21.11116/0000-0004-DC4B-1.ISSN 0960-9822.PMID 31104936.S2CID 155104811.
  10. ^Kapli, Paschalia; Telford, Maximilian J. (11 December 2020)."Topology-dependent asymmetry in systematic errors affects phylogenetic placement of Ctenophora and Xenacoelomorpha".Science Advances.6 (10) eabc5162.Bibcode:2020SciA....6.5162K.doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc5162.PMC 7732190.PMID 33310849.
  11. ^Rouse, Greg W.; Wilson, Nerida G.; Carvajal, Jose I.; Vrijenhoek, Robert C. (4 February 2016). "New deep-sea species ofXenoturbella and the position of Xenacoelomorpha".Nature.530 (7588):94–97.Bibcode:2016Natur.530...94R.doi:10.1038/nature16545.ISSN 0028-0836.PMID 26842060.S2CID 3870574.
  12. ^Nakano, Hiroaki; Miyazawa, Hideyuki; Maeno, Akiteru; Shiroishi, Toshihiko; Kakui, Keiichi; Koyanagi, Ryo; Kanda, Miyuki; Satoh, Noriyuki; Omori, Akihito; Kohtsuka, Hisanori (18 December 2017)."A new species ofXenoturbella from the western Pacific Ocean and the evolution ofXenoturbella".BMC Evolutionary Biology.17 (1): 245.Bibcode:2017BMCEE..17..245N.doi:10.1186/s12862-017-1080-2.ISSN 1471-2148.PMC 5733810.PMID 29249199.
  13. ^Jondelius, Ulf; Wallberg, Andreas; Hooge, Matthew; Raikova, Olga (December 2011)."How the Worm Got its Pharynx: Phylogeny, Classification and Bayesian Assessment of Character Evolution in Acoela".Systematic Biology.60 (6):845–871.doi:10.1093/sysbio/syr073.PMID 21828080.
  14. ^Pontarotti, Pierre (1 October 2019).Evolution, Origin of Life, Concepts and Methods. Springer Nature.ISBN 978-3-030-30363-1.
  15. ^Nakano, H. (2019)."Development of Xenoturbellida".Evo-Devo: Non-model Species in Cell and Developmental Biology. Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation. Vol. 68. pp. 251–258.doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23459-1_11.ISBN 978-3-030-23458-4.PMID 31598860.S2CID 204033850.
  16. ^Achatz, J. G.; Chiodin, M.; Salvenmoser, W.; Tyler, S.; Martinez, P. (2012)."The Acoela: On their kind and kinships, especially with nemertodermatids and xenoturbellids (Bilateria incertae sedis)".Organisms, Diversity & Evolution.13 (2):267–286.Bibcode:2013ODivE..13..267A.doi:10.1007/s13127-012-0112-4.PMC 3789126.PMID 24098090.
  17. ^Abalde, Samuel; Tellgren-Roth, Christian; Heintz, Julia; Vinnere Pettersson, Olga; Jondelius, Ulf (2023)."The draft genome of the microscopic Nemertoderma westbladi sheds light on the evolution of Acoelomorpha genomes".Frontiers in Genetics.14 1244493.doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1244493.PMC 10565955.PMID 37829276.
  18. ^abAchatz, Johannes G.; Chiodin, Marta; Salvenmoser, Willi; Tyler, Seth; Martinez, Pedro (June 2013)."The Acoela: on their kind and kinships, especially with nemertodermatids and xenoturbellids (Bilateria incertae sedis)".Organisms Diversity & Evolution.13 (2):267–286.Bibcode:2013ODivE..13..267A.doi:10.1007/s13127-012-0112-4.ISSN 1439-6092.PMC 3789126.PMID 24098090.
  19. ^The digestive system of xenacoelomorphs - CORE
  20. ^abPerea-Atienza, E.; Gavilan, B.; Chiodin, M.; Abril, J.F.; Hoff, K.J.; Poustka, A.J.; Martinez, P. (2015)."The nervous system of Xenacoelomorpha: A genomic perspective".Journal of Experimental Biology.218 (4):618–628.Bibcode:2015JExpB.218..618P.doi:10.1242/jeb.110379.hdl:2445/192702.ISSN 0022-0949.PMID 25696825.
  21. ^Franzen, Ake; Afzelius, Bjorn A. (January 1987). "The ciliated epidermis of Xenoturbella bocki (Platyhelminthes, Xenoturbellida) with some phylogenetic considerations".Zoologica Scripta.16 (1):9–17.doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.1987.tb00046.x.ISSN 0300-3256.S2CID 85675105.
Animalia
ParaHoxozoa
(Planulozoa)
Bilateria (Triploblasts)
  • (see below↓)
Thephylogeny of the animal rootis disputed; see also
Eumetazoa
Benthozoa
Bilateria
Ambulacraria
Protostomia
Ecdysozoa
Scalidophora
N+L+P
Nematoida
L+P
Panarthropoda
Spiralia
Gnathifera
M+S
Platytrochozoa
R+M
Rouphozoa
Mesozoa
Lophotrochozoa
M+K
Kryptotrochozoa
Lophophorata
Bryozoa s.l.
Brachiozoa

Major groups
within phyla
Phyla with ≥1000 extant speciesbolded
Potentiallydubious phyla
Extantlife phyla/divisions by domain
Bacteria
Archaea
Eukaryote
Protist
Fungi
Land plant
Animal
Incertae sedis
Xenacoelomorpha
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Xenacoelomorpha&oldid=1322375151"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp