Wisconsin Progressive Party | |
|---|---|
| Leader | Philip La Follette Robert M. La Follette, Jr. |
| Founded | May 19, 1934; 91 years ago (1934-05-19) |
| Dissolved | March 17, 1946; 79 years ago (1946-03-17) |
| Split from | Republican Party (in part) Democratic Party (in part) |
| Merged into | Republican party |
| Ideology | |
| Political position | Left-wing[4] |
| National affiliation | National Progressives of America |
| Colors | Green (Customary) |
TheWisconsin Progressive Party (1934–1946) was a politicalthird party that briefly held a major role inWisconsin politics under the two sons of the lateRobert M. La Follette.[5] It was on the political left wing, and it sometimes cooperated with theNew Deal.[6][7]
The Party was the brainchild ofPhilip La Follette andRobert M. La Follette, Jr., the sons ofWisconsin Governor and SenatorRobert M. La Follette, Sr. The party was established in 1934 as an alliance between the longstanding "Progressive" faction of theRepublican Party of Wisconsin, led by the La Follette family and their political allies, and certain radical farm and labor groups active in Wisconsin at the time.[8] JournalistJohn Nichols argues that the1924 platform that Robert La Follette Sr., ran on:
"taxing the rich, cracking down on Wall Street abuses, empowering workers to organize unions, defending small farmers, breaking up corporate trusts, strengthening public utilities — fueled a resurgence of left-wing populist movements across the upper Midwest: the Non-Partisan League of North Dakota, the Farmer-Labor Party of Minnesota and the Progressive Party of Wisconsin."
Buoying off of popular discontent with both major parties, the La Follette brothers were both successful in their bids, and the party saw a number of other victories as well in the1934 and1936 elections, notably winning severalU.S. House seats and a majority of theWisconsin State Senate andWisconsin State Assembly in 1936. In 1936 it was informally allied with theNew Deal coalition and supported the reelection of PresidentFranklin Roosevelt.[9]
This sectionneeds expansion with: Needs General information about Progressive governance of Wisconsin, This should also include information about the "Wisconsin Works Bill" and the "Wisconsin Reorganization Orders". You can help byadding to it.(April 2025) |
Following the re-election of Philip, he took a far different tone for his second term than he had for his first. In his second inaugural address he stressed the need for reform in more concrete terms, advocating for an increase in executive power and calling for increased spending towards schools and wages despite a projected $9 million dollar shortfall in the budget.[10]: 178
Their grip on power proved short-lived: they succumbed to a united Democratic and Republican front in 1938 which swept most of them out of office, including Philip La Follette. The party effectively collapsed when Philip went off to serve in thePacific War duringWorld War II. During La Follette's absence, the party failed to formulate a coherent party platform and instead opted to criticize the governor at the time,Julius P. Heil.
During its heyday, the Progressive Party usually did not run candidates in theSocialists (known as the "sewer socialists") stronghold ofMilwaukee. There were strong ideological differences between the two movements as the two aligned with differing national parties. (Socialist State RepresentativeGeorge L. Tews said during a 1932 debate onunemployment compensation and how to fund it argued for the Socialist bill and against the Progressive substitute, stating that a Progressive was "a Socialist with the brains knocked out"),[11] when both faced opposition from the conservative major parties. During the period from 1939 on, the Progressives and the Socialists of Milwaukee sometimes made common cause, with Socialist legislators caucusing with the minority Progressives. In 1942, SocialistFrank P. Zeidler, later to be elected mayor of Milwaukee, was the nominee on the Progressive party line forState Treasurer of Wisconsin.
The last politician to hold office from the Wisconsin Progressive Party nationally wasMerlin Hull, a U.S. Representative from Wisconsin, elected as a Progressive in 1944. (Hull continued to be re-elected on the Republican ticket, and served until his death in 1953.)[a]

This sectionneeds expansion with: This section doesn't have any content. You can help byadding to it.(May 2025) |
As one of the Senate's leading isolationists, Robert helped found theAmerica First Committee in 1940 to oppose Roosevelt's foreign policy and denounce risk of U.S. entry into World War II.[12] Soon Philip found himself working alongside figures such asCharles Lindbergh, which led some to assume he had shifted towards more conservative politics.[13][14][15][16]
Orland Steen Loomis was the last Progressive to be elected Governor of Wisconsin, in the 1942 election. He died, however, before his inauguration as governor. Robert La Follette Jr. held on to his Senate seat until 1946, when the party decided to disband itself. Robert La Folletteran for re-election that year as a Republican rather than a Progressive, but was defeated in the Republican primary byJoe McCarthy.
By 1946, the Wisconsin Progressive Party had all but collapsed, barely qualifying for major party status after the 1944 elections. While Philip La Follette had desired for the party to continue on, after being advised to stay out of the 1946 convention, the Party voted to dissolve itself, voting 284 to 131 to rejoin theRepublican Party.[17][18][10]: 247
| Governor | Lieutenant governor | Attorney general | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Nominee | # votes | % votes | Place | Notes | Year | Nominee | # votes | % votes | Place | Notes | Year | Nominee | # votes | % votes | Place | Notes |
| 1934 | Philip La Follette | 373,093 | 39.12 / 100 | Elected | 1934 | Henry Gunderson | 313,682 | 35.25 / 100 | 2nd of 7 | 1934 | Fred M. Wylie | 303,387 | 35.06 / 100 | 2nd of 7 | |||
| 1936 | 573,724 | 46.38 / 100 | Re-elected | 1936 | 465,918 | 41.69 / 100 | Elected | 1936 | Orland Steen Loomis | 394,252 | 36.10 / 100 | Elected | |||||
| 1938 | 353,381 | 36.00 / 100 | 2nd of 5 | 1938 | George A. Nelson | 313,066 | 34.36 / 100 | 2nd of 5 | 1938 | 316,657 | 35.24 / 100 | 2nd of 4 | |||||
| 1940 | Orland Steen Loomis | 546,436 | 39.78 / 100 | 2nd of 5 | 1940 | Anton M. Miller | 411,055 | 32.53 / 100 | 2nd of 4 | 1940 | Otto F. Christenson | 367,009 | 29.76 / 100 | 2nd of 4 | |||
| 1942 | 397,664 | 49.65 / 100 | Elected | 1942 | Henry J. Berquist | 256,851 | 34.82 / 100 | 2nd of 5 | 1942 | William H. Dieterich | 205,730 | 21.41 / 100 | 2nd of 5 | ||||
| 1944 | Alexander Otto Benz | 76,028 | 5.76 / 100 | 3rd of 5 | 1944 | Clough Gates | 79,068 | 6.38 / 100 | 3rd of 4 | 1944 | 84,989 | 7.00 / 100 | 3rd of 4 | ||||
| Secretary of state | Treasurer | ||||||||||||||||
| Year | Nominee | # votes | % votes | Place | Notes | Year | Nominee | # votes | % votes | Place | Notes | ||||||
| 1934 | Theodore Dammann | 419,249 | 46.66 / 100 | Re-elected | 1934 | Albert C. Johnson | 302,639 | 34.41 / 100 | 2nd of 6 | ||||||||
| 1936 | 601,638 | 52.12 / 100 | Re-elected | 1936 | Solomon Levitan | 457,942 | 40.03 / 100 | Elected | |||||||||
| 1938 | 391,150 | 41.61 / 100 | 2nd of 5 | 1938 | 368,707 | 40.28 / 100 | 2nd of 5 | ||||||||||
| 1940 | Adolph W. Larsen | 332,505 | 26.03 / 100 | 2nd of 4 | 1940 | Frank Zeidler | 382,237 | 30.65 / 100 | 2nd of 4 | ||||||||
| 1942 | John H. Kaiser | 196,287 | 26.19 / 100 | 2nd of 5 | 1942 | Albert C. Johnson | 215,995 | 29.63 / 100 | 2nd of 5 | ||||||||
| 1944 | Adelaide Woelfel | 12,681 | 1.04 / 100 | 4th of 4 | 1944 | 73,451 | 5.98 / 100 | 3rd of 4 | |||||||||
| Wisconsin Senate | Wisconsin Assembly | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Election | Leader | Votes | Seats | Position | Control | Election | Leader | Votes | Seats | Position | Control | ||||
| No. | Share | No. | ± | No. | Share | No. | ± | ||||||||
| 1934 | N/A | 136,749 | 32.53% | 11 / 33 | 2nd | Democratic–Republican | 1934 | Jorge W. Carow | 304,804 | 34.09% | 45 / 100 | 1st | Progressive minority | ||
| 1936 | Walter J. Rush | 242,631 | 42.00% | 16 / 33 | 1st | Progressive minority | 1936 | 437,916 | 38.73% | 46 / 100 | 1st | Progressive minority | |||
| 1938 | N/A | 154,891 | 35.00% | 11 / 33 | 2nd | Republican minority | 1938 | Paul Alfonsi | 32 / 100 | 2nd | Republican | ||||
| 1940 | Philip E. Nelson | 212,631 | 32.09% | 6 / 33 | 2nd | Republican | 1940 | N/A | 25 / 100 | 2nd | Republican | ||||
| 1942 | 85,806 | 25.18% | 6 / 33 | 2nd | Republican | 1942 | Andrew Biemiller | 13 / 100 | 3rd | Republican | |||||
| 1944 | N/A | 47,895 | 8.81% | 5 / 33 | 3rd | Republican | 1944 | Lyall T. Beggs | 6 / 100 | 3rd | Republican | ||||
| U.S. Senate | U.S. House of Representatives | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Nominee | # votes | % votes | Place | Notes | Election | Leader | Votes | Seats | Position | Control | |||
| 1934 | Robert M. La Follette Jr. | 440,513 | 47.78 / 100 | Re-elected | 1934 | George J. Schneider | 334,345 | 37.76% | 7 / 10 | 1st | Progressive | |||
| 1936 | No seat up | 1936 | George J. Schneider | 479,263 | 42.69% | 7 / 10 | 1st | Progressive | ||||||
| 1938 | Herman Ekern | 249,209 | 26.58 / 100 | 2nd of 6 | 1938 | George J. Schneider | 330,823 | 36.26% | 2 / 10 | 2nd | Republican | |||
| 1940 | Robert M. La Follette Jr. | 605,609 | 45.26 / 100 | Re-elected | 1940 | N/A | 469,063 | 36.96% | 3 / 10 | 2nd | Republican | |||
| 1942 | No seat up | 1942 | N/A | 185,114 | 24.72% | 2 / 10 | 3rd | Republican | ||||||
| 1944 | Harry Sauthoff | 73,089 | 5.82 / 100 | 3rd of 5 | 1944 | N/A | 104,377 | 9.01% | 1 / 10 | 3rd | Republican | |||
Though he died of a heart attack less than a year after the election, La Follette's success inspired other progressive movements and campaigns around the country, including farmer-labor parties in Minnesota and North Dakota, the Progressive Party in Wisconsin, and the American Labor Party in New York City.
In fact, the program that La Follette ran on — taxing the rich, cracking down on Wall Street abuses, empowering workers to organize unions, defending small farmers, breaking up corporate trusts, strengthening public utilities — fueled a resurgence of left-wing populist movements across the upper Midwest: the Non-Partisan League of North Dakota, the Farmer-Labor Party of Minnesota and the Progressive Party of Wisconsin.
In the majority of these states, during either the 1890s or interwar years, left-wing third-party movements—the Populist Party, Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party, North Dakota Nonpartisan League, and Wisconsin Progressive Party