William Spencer Vickrey (21 June 1914 – 11 October 1996) was a Canadian-American professor of economics. He was a lifelong faculty member atColumbia University. A theorist who worked onpublic economics and mechanism design, Vickrey primarily discussed public policy problems. He originated theVickrey auction, introduced the concept ofcongestion pricing in networks, formalized arguments formarginal cost pricing, and contributed to optimal income taxation.James Tobin described him as "an applied economist's theorist, as well as a theorist's applied economist."[1]
Vickrey was born inVictoria, British Columbia to Charles Vernon Vickrey, a Congregationalist minister, and Ada Eliza Spencer. The family moved to New York City in William's childhood, where his father was General Secretary of theAmerican Committee for Armenian and Syrian Relief, one of the nation's first humanitarian assistance organizations.[2]
Vickrey was the first to use the tools ofgame theory to explain thedynamics of auctions.[5] In his seminal paper, Vickrey derived several auction equilibria, and provided an early revenue-equivalence result. Therevenue equivalence theorem remains the centrepiece of modern auction theory. TheVickrey auction is named after him.[5]
Vickrey worked oncongestion pricing, the notion that roads and other services should be priced so that users see the costs that arise from the service being fully used when there is still demand.[6][7][8][9] Congestion pricing gives a signal to users to adjust their behavior or to investors to expand the service in order to remove the constraint. The theory was later partiallyput into action in London.
Inpublic economics, Vickrey extended themarginal cost pricing approach ofHarold Hotelling and showed how public goods should be provided at marginal cost.[10] He contended that efficient funding for public utilities and transportation systems required short-run marginal pricing, or pricing responsive to current demand.[1]
Alongside marginal cost pricing, Vickrey argued that theland value tax was necessary to efficiently fund city services. He wrote that replacing taxes on production and labor ("including property taxes on improvements") with fees for holding valuable land sites "would substantially improve the economic efficiency of the jurisdiction".[11] Vickrey further argued that land value tax had no adverse effects and that replacing existing taxes in this way would increase local productivity enough that land prices would rise instead of fall. He also made an ethical argument forGeorgistvalue capture, noting that owners of valuable locations still take (exclude others from) local public goods, even if they choose not to use them, so without land value tax, land users have to pay twice for those public services (once in tax to government and once in rent to holders of land title).[12]
Vickrey's Nobel Prize in Economics was announced on October 8, 1996. He became the only Nobel laureate born inBritish Columbia.
Vickrey died three days later while traveling to a conference ofGeorgist academics that he helped found.[15][16] HisColumbia University economics department colleagueC. Lowell Harriss accepted the posthumous prize on his behalf. There are only three other cases where a Nobel Prize has been presented posthumously:Erik Axel Karlfeldt (Literature 1931),Dag Hammarskjöld (Peace 1961) andRalph Steinman (Physiology or Medicine 2011).[17]
Arrow, Kenneth Joseph; Arnott, Richard J.; Atkinson, Anthony A.; Drèze, Jacques, eds. (1997).Public Economics: Selected Papers by William Vickrey. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0521597630.
^Gaffney, Mason (14 May 1998).Red-Light Taxes and Green-Light Taxes. Sharing Our Common Heritage: Resource Taxes and Green Dividends. Mansfield College, Oxford.Georgists need to introspect deeply over this case, and many like it, and master the theory and practice of marginal-cost pricing as developed so ably by closet Georgist economists like Harold Hotelling and William Vickrey
^Vickrey, William. "The Corporate Income Tax in the U.S. Tax System, 73 Tax Notes 597, 603 (1996). Quote: "Removing almost all business taxes, including property taxes on improvements, excepting only taxes reflecting the marginal social cost of public services rendered to specific activities, and replacing them with taxes on site values, would substantially improve the economic efficiency of the jurisdiction."