| Please do not nominate users for awards here; instead,be bold and give the user you have in mind an award using the templates atWP:*,WP:WPPA,WP:ORA,WP:PUA, or a similar page. Thanks! |
| This is thetalk page for discussingWikiProject Wikipedia Awards and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
| Archives:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26Auto-archiving period:30 days |
| The content ofWikipedia:Barnstars 2.0 wasmerged intoWikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia Awards on 4 April 2012. The former page'shistory now serves toprovide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see itstalk page. |
This project page was nominated fordeletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
At AfC I decided to passErythrocyte-based drug delivery despite some AI writing concerns. These have somewhat been addressed over time but it is still a work in progress. One userWeirdNAnnoyed in particular has done a great job of tackling this massive problem. They have done so not only on this article but it is a useful example. I was about to award an original barnstar, but I think we should make a dedicated barnstar. This is a novel problem in editing that many editors will need to learn about. I think a dedicated barnstar will help to make example editors that we as a community can learn from. At Village Pump there has been many attempts, with limited success, to build consensus on AI policy. A dedicated barnstar may help to bring attention to cases where editors are doing a good job thereby creating moments to learn from a grow a future consensus.Czarking0 (talk)20:07, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
I came across this userUser:GOLDIEM J 's user page who has awarded himself theWikipedia:Service awards#Journeyman Editor (or Grognard) Journeyman Editor award. The award's requirements state that the user needs to have 2000 edits.
However, upon checking this User's user logs (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/GOLDIEM_J&type=&user=GOLDIEM_J&offset=&limit=100) it seems that they have less than a 100 edits.
What is the due course of action in this case?
I'm new here and would like to be a participant in this WikiProject, hence I thought it is vital to bring this to attention here.Kingsacrificer (talk)14:58, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing on a userpage is disruptive editing.is inaccurate advice, @OmegaAOL, it might be good for you to strike that so newer editors don't read it and think it's true.Schazjmd (talk)13:39, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing on a userpage is disruptive editingcould be interpreted as "I can do anything I want on my userpage and not get in trouble for it" which is untrue.Schazjmd (talk)15:52, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I found a barnstar related to experimental aircraft earlier today, and as far as I know, it's not included on any lists relating to barnstars. The link to the barnstar on Wikimedia Commons can be found at this link[1] along with a silver version[2]. If this could be added to a list of barnstars I'd very much appreciate it! :)🀰☯🀰Hexes54☯Talk to me🀰☯🀰12:01, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So do we have any policy on this? I'm referring specifically to thisone, which has been given after a uservandalisedarticles. It seems to me that rewarding vandals with barnstars is antithetical to the purpose of barnstars.Valenciano (talk)10:31, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
| The Inspiration Barnstar | ||
| Presented to an editor whose contributions have meaningfully inspired the work of the awarding editor. |
This is a concept I hope to introduce.
r f q i italk!03:43, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I could use some assistance from someone significantly smarter than myself. I was awarded the Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar on my TP, and while it displays fine in desktop I noticed that the image is tiny in mobile mode. Didn't think much about it until I sawthis one, which displays how I'd expect. I popped into edit for both and the wiki sourcecode appears identical with the exception of text and image sources. Then, because I can't let anything go, I pulled up DevTools for both and drilled down into the page codes, and I thought I'd finally found the issue in a span class discrepancy - but when I went to check again it was gone and they both look identical now and I can hear colors and smell burning toast. Help a poor http-1 fluency newbie out??
(Yes, I should probably download the app and it's entirely possible it would make this whole thing go away, but right now I need to go find a fire extinguisher for my brain.)ChompyTheGogoat (talk)12:29, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]