Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United Kingdom
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussingWikiProject United Kingdom and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives:1,2,3,4Auto-archiving period:31 days  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Archives |
| 1,2,3,4 |
This page has archives. Sections older than31 days may be auto-archived byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5. |
List of British regional nicknames is overwhelmingly made up of highly dubious, uncited entries. I started manually, but is there a quick way of at least weeding out the uncited ones? Or would others care to pitch in manually? (That said, many of the citations also look dubious.)Mutt Lunker (talk)12:46, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dwain Chambers has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)01:41, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fort Belvedere, Surrey has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)21:36, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I have submitted a COI edit request for the British School of Bucharest article.
The proposed update is neutral and supported by independent sources.If an uninvolved editor could take a look when convenient, I would be grateful.
Talk page link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:British_School_of_Bucharest#Phase_2_%E2%80%93_Independently_sourced_expansion
Thank you.
— Educator2025Educator2025 (talk)08:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleChester Friary of the Sack has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced for 15 years. Tagged as unsourced for almost 5 years. Zero hits on Google. FailsWP:V. Creator has been banned.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular,articles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion based onestablished criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you mayrequest undeletion of the article at any time.Bearian (talk)22:20, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Progressive rock has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)16:13, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
