Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels/Military fiction task force
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Editors of this task force will be interested inthis discussion over atWT:NOVELS. Regards, —Ed (talk •majestic titan)19:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in theWP 1.0 assessment system. OnSaturday, January 23, 2010, theWP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project'ssummary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at theWP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl(CBM · talk)03:36, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please come participate in the move discussion atTalk:List of films based on war books — peace#Requested move. Thanks! ···日本穣? ·投稿 ·Talk to Nihonjoe19:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by theWikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles wereselected based on their assessed importance and quality, then articleversions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of theWikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review theMilitary fiction task force articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us atWikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject'sarticles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID atWikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such asOne Laptop per Child andWikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, withyour WikiProject's feedback!
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team,SelectionBot23:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings, all.
I would like to call attention to an edit war looming on theVortex article - perhaps somebody here could restore some needed sanity there by giving one's casual opinion on the plot synopsis? Another user,Eaglestorm, has repeatedly altered the existing revision by filling it with inaccurate information, unneeded tactical details, and overall plot dump. When I removed these on specified grounds, he attacked the earlier revision as being utterly inaccurate, even when I pointed out similar issues with his own. Although I have suggested he give me some examples of said inaccuracy to work with, (and even recommended that we approach the subject on the talk page) he has openly ignored this appeal and continued his problematic edits.
It's obviously a very situation, and a third opinion would very much be appreciated.
Thanks! --Katangais (talk)03:16, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of theWP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting theweb tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions atthis Google form where you can leave your response.Walkerma (talk)04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Formal request has been received to merge:How Few Remain,The Great War (novel series),The Great War: American Front,The Great War: Walk in Hell,The Great War: Breakthroughs,American Empire (Harry Turtledove),American Empire: Blood and Iron,American Empire: The Center Cannot Hold,American Empire: The Victorious Opposition,Settling Accounts,Settling Accounts: Return Engagement,Settling Accounts: Drive to the East,Settling Accounts: The Grapple andSettling Accounts: In at the Death intoSouthern Victory. Please join the re-opened discussion at>>>Turtledove series merge<<<. Thanks,GenQuest"Talk to Me"07:20, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited to join the discussion atWikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks!—CX Zoom[he/him](let's talk • {C•X})06:35, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is a requested move discussion atTalk:Fires on the Plain (novel)#Requested move 24 March 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.TarnishedPathtalk07:44, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
