| Main page | Talk | Popular Pages | Assessment | Portal | Article Alerts | To do | Project Banner |
| This is thetalk page for discussingWikiProject New York (state) and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
| Archives (index):1,2,3,4Auto-archiving period:6 months |
| This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
I shouldn't have to say that I don't want to use Wikipedia for legal advice. However, I do want to learn about state politics, and that means finding relevant authors, journals, and databases. Can you help?Shushimnotrealstooge (talk)02:51, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This has been unreferenced for at least 15 years. I can't find anything either official or significant. Can somebody please add reliable sources to this article?Bearian (talk)03:00, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
TheRosamond Gifford Zoo recently acquired aMarco Polo sheep named Tilek. This is a rare subspecies and as far as I am aware, we have no photos of a living one. I would greatly appreciate if someone near Syracuse could photograph this animal for the page.ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk)05:05, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is an RFC atTalk:New York Islanders #RFC - How to indicate team location in opening which may be of interest to members of this project.Servite et contribuere (talk)11:02, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, theWikiProject GovDirectory is hoping to publish some US content in time forWikiConference North America coming up in mid October. New York State is one of the few U.S. states that's had some active development for GovDirectory. With a bit of a push, this content could be ready to include on GovDirectory for the Conference. To learn more, see theGovDirectory New York project page.
While GovDirectory is mainly a WikiData project, if you're more focused on Wikipedia, updating theCategory:State agencies of New York (state) and/or creating a list article (which can include agencies without Wikipedia pages) would also be very helpful to the project.JMMaok (talk)16:00, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please add reliable sources to this article.Bearian (talk)02:57, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleHawthorne Valley Waldorf School has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Tagged for BLP sources for 8 years. Tagged for notability concerns for a month. Fails the relevant notability guidelines.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Bearian (talk)20:30, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An edit from 2022 made byUser:BrownHairedGirl seems to have permanently dislocated an image in the article onWest Sayville, New York, and nothing I've been able to do has reversed this error. I was about to contact her on this, only to find out she was Semi-Retired from Wikipedia. I don't believe the edit was malicious or even intentional. Can anybody else fix this, because putting the image back in its proper place has been proven to be an exceptional pain in the ass. ---------User:DanTD (talk)12:38, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Albany City Hall has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)00:14, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Battle of Long Island has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)01:07, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has requested thatThe New York Times Manual of Style and Usage be moved toNew York Times Manual of Style, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate inthe move discussion.Qwerty123M (talk)02:22, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Edward Said has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)15:29, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Jack F. Matlock Jr. has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)01:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleList of property developers based in New York has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Tagged as Unreferenced for 6 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. Zero hits on Google: appears to be entirely original research.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Bearian (talk)03:41, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]