This is thetalk page for discussingWikiProject Human rights and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text.Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome!Learn to edit;get help. Assume good faith Be polite andavoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seekdispute resolution if needed Shortcut WT:HRWT:HR

Archives:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13Auto-archiving period:3 months

	This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
Human rights This page is within the scope ofWikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofHuman rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights

WikiProject Human rights was featured ina WikiProject Report in theSignpost on 10 December 2012.

There is an ongoing discussion atTalk:Chenab Valley (Jammu Division)#August 2025, with one side stating that the Chenab Valley is a legitimate geographic valley, and the other claiming that it is a communal form of Kashmiri Muslim Irredentism. To editors, please join the discussionEarthDude (wannatalk?)05:36, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gaza genocide has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments onthe discussion page. Thank you.Opm581^{(talk|he/him)}03:31, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is an ongoing discussion atTalk:Hindutva pop#Nazi music. I am requesting input from interested editors.EarthDude (wannatalk?)05:10, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.I am looking for some help in approving an article I sumitted on July 20, 2025. The title is Draft:Right to Read inquiry report. Following the suggestions of two editors, I added many new citations and additional content, and rewrote some sections to be more encyclopedic. I believe the draft should meet the criteria to be published. Can someone please take a look and either approve the article or give me some suggestions for improvement? Thank you.John NH (talk)13:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for input at a discussion taking place regarding a content dispute ofHyderabad massacres atTalk:Hyderabad massacres#POV and citation check.EarthDude (wannatalk?)21:14, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion atTemplate talk:Discrimination § Scope: Articles on discriminatory subjects, which is within the scope of this WikiProject.Raladic (talk)17:18, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleHindu revolution is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu revolution until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—EarthDude (wannatalk?)11:05, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion atTalk:Peon#Requested move 21 October 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<––21:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion atTalk:Knowledge of the Holocaust in Nazi Germany and German-occupied Europe#Requested move 19 October 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.TarnishedPath^talk02:01, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See here please.David A (talk)08:19, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is an ongoing RfC atNPOVN on whether gender exploratory therapy should be described as a form of conversion therapy. Editors interested in the issue are welcome to comment.TarnishedPath^talk06:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

R v Thomas has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)00:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion atTalk:Flight of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians#Requested move 9 November 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.TarnishedPath^talk01:08, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It appears this article has been rated C-class because of term confusion with related articles. All of the information in the article has been subject to multiple peer-reviews.~2025-35814-70 (talk)15:06, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the rating is fair. Multiple statements are uncited, many others clearly read as ad copy, there are multiple cleanup tags (some of which I added after assessing the article), and I do not see what you mean by all information being subject to peer review. Per the talk page, no peer review of the page have been done. Unless you mean that the sources are all peer reviewed, which many are not (and at least one comes from an unreliable source, theInternational Business Times).Spookyaki (talk)17:59, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The rating is consistent with theORES rating.Peaceray (talk)03:20, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Project-Class Human rights pages
• NA-importance Human rights pages
• WikiProject Human rights articles