Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hip-hop

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is thetalk page for discussingWikiProject Hip-hop and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
Archives:1,2,3,4,5Auto-archiving period:30 days 
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconHip-hop
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope ofWikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage ofhip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit theproject page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to thediscussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop

Welcome to the discussion page of theHip hop WikiProject!

Hh-WikiProject
Project pagetalk
Assessmenttalk
Announcements
Collaborations
To-do list
Request list
Quality list
Media

Good article reassessment forSir Lucious Left Foot: The Son of Chico Dusty

[edit]

Sir Lucious Left Foot: The Son of Chico Dusty has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)21:36, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move atTalk:I'm a Boss (song)#Requested move 7 January 2026

[edit]

There is a requested move discussion atTalk:I'm a Boss (song)#Requested move 7 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<––01:25, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment forVanilla Ice

[edit]

Vanilla Ice has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)14:54, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion ofKsięga Tajemnicza. Prolog

[edit]
Notice

The articleKsięga Tajemnicza. Prolog has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for almost 14 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate: the Polish article is sourced to blogs and Discogs. Makes wildly dubious claims.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular,articles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion based onestablished criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you mayrequest undeletion of the article at any time.Bearian (talk)16:05, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question about sources for hip-hop artist draft

[edit]

Hello, I’m working on a draft article for a hip-hop artist currently under Articles for Creation review. The draft uses coverage from AllHipHop, Sheen Magazine, and a longer profile from The Bridge Magazine.

I’m seeking input from WikiProject Hip hop editors on whether these publications are generally considered reliable secondary sources and whether the depth of coverage would meet expectations for music biography articles.

I want to make sure the article aligns with Wikipedia sourcing standards. Thank you for any guidance.Godsentme1 (talk)06:44, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinked categories

[edit]

As you guys obviously know, Wikipedia's categories for the genre of music use the spelling hip-hop with a hyphen — but theredlinked category report sees aconstant infusion of pages where somebody has either erroneously used the unhyphenated "hip hop" on a new article instead of the existing categories, or tried toflip longstanding articles thatwere in the existing categoriesback to the unhyphenated spelling for some reason. There are almostalways at least one or two, and sometimes several more, "hip hop" categories for which the exact same category already exists at the "hip-hop" form, on that report practically every single time it updates with new redlinked categories, so it's becoming adisruptive pain in the badonkadonk to have to keep fixing this over and over and over again.

So I wanted to ask if there would be any support for ensuring that any category with a hyphenated hip-hop spelling also has a categoryredirect from the unhyphenated hip hop, so that this stops being my problem to fix and can be left to the bots that fix categoryredirect errors instead?Bearcat (talk)18:57, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This proposal seems sensible to me!Redirects are cheap, after all, and there's evidently a use case for the specific ones you propose.ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs)20:47, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Brothers uv da Blakmarket

[edit]

Please add reliable sources.Bearian (talk)20:37, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Hip-hop&oldid=1338885584"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp