Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
icon
WikiProject Cricket
  • 2.5% List-Class
  • 62.1% Stub-Class
  • 31.5% Start-Class
  • 2.2% C-Class
  • 0.8% B-Class
  • 0.3% GA-Class
  • 0.6% FA-Class
icon
Main pageDiscussionTasksDeletionsThe NetsAssessmentResourcesContestsAwardsMembers
Summary ofCricket WikiProject open tasks
watch ·edit ·full list
News and announcements
  • The newsletter titled,The Stump Sapient is slated for a 2025 launch.
  • We are looking for Bengali/Hindi/Pashtun/Punjabi/Sinhala/Tamil speakers to find and translate non-English language sources.
Current discussions
No major discussions are open at the moment
Featured article candidates
No candidates at present
Featured article review
No candidates at present
Featured list candidates
No candidates at present
Featured list removal candidates
No candidates at present
Featured picture candidates
No candidates at present
Other featured content candidates
No candidates at present
Peer reviews
No candidates at present
Good article nominees
Colin Ingleby-Mackenzie
Good article reassessments
No candidates at present
Recent deaths
2025:Bob Cowper (10 May) •Hammond Furlonge (6 May) •Keith Stackpole (22 April) •David Renneberg (7 April) •Farooq Hamid (3 April) •Peter Lever (27 March) •Syed Abid Ali (12 March) •Ronald Draper (28 February) •Keith Slater (24 February) •Buster Farrer (31 January)
2024:Ian Redpath (1 December) •Mohammad Nazir (21 November) •Charles Fry (27 October) •Brian Hastings (7 October) •Frank Misson (11 September) •Graham Thorpe (4 August) •Anshuman Gaekwad (31 July) •Ken Palmer (23 July) •Billy Ibadulla (12 July) •David Johnson (20 June) •Raman Subba Row (17 April) •Derek Underwood (15 April) •Jack Alabaster (9 April) •Saeed Ahmed (20 March) •Robin Hobbs (17 March) •Duncan Fearnley (8 March) •Mike Procter (17 February) •Datta Gaekwad (13 February)

Articles that need...quality assessment (5) •importance assessment (10) •taskforce assigned (8,782) •project tags fixed (0) •limited improvement (1,085) •significant improvement (15,410) •significant expansion (30,341)

WikiProject Cricket
Lead article (talk)
Portal (talk) •Root category (talk)
Cricket templates
Cricket studies

This is thetalk page for discussingWikiProject Cricket and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
Archives (index):1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96Auto-archiving period:20 days 
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects.
WikiProject iconCricketicon
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope ofWikiProject Cricket, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcricket articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit theproject page, where you can join thediscussion.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket
Note icon
This page has been marked as needing ataskforce assigned.
WikiProject Cricket To-do list:
Article assessment
Verifiability
Cleanup
Infoboxes
Cricket people
Cricket teams & countries
Images
On this day in cricket
Umpires
Women
Update
Other
WikiProject iconSports
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope ofWikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofsport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject Cricket was featured ina WikiProject Report in theSignpost on 17 January 2011.

    T20 Spring Challenge Notability Review

    [edit]

    Hello all! Is it possible that we could discuss the notability ofT20 Spring Challenge? I have already tagged it for notability. If not notable in it's own right, a merge withWomen's Big Bash League is an obviousWP:ATD. Let's review it shall we?Servite et contribuere (talk)02:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Notability does seem questionable, I've checked sources and they are mostly onlyWP:ROUTINE coverage, no other independent coverage is available.Vestrian24Bio04:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Certainly the two season articles would seem to be very dubious in terms of notability – 2024 T20 Spring Challenge and2025 T20 Spring Challenge. They certainly need a tonne of cleanup, mainly removing and simplifying tables. I'd probably tend to delete those articles first – it's never a good sign whenCricInfo's main page for the league says "No content found". There's more chance that the league article survives at AfD, along the lines of theTop End T20 Series where the2024 (AfD) and2025 (AfD) seasons were both deletedBlue Square Thing (talk)12:00, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Blue Square Thing On the source where it said "No content found" there actually was content for matches, and there is something here:[1][2]. But they are primary sources. I think aSelective merge is appropriate. E.G. information on matches could me merged into a new section on the Pre Season, but we don't really need information on the squads for example.Servite et contribuere (talk)15:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    We need content that is more than just a database listing to demonstrate notabaility, which is what the cricinfo scorecards are. They seemingly have no prose reporting on the tournament.Spike 'em (talk)15:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Spike 'em It is basically a pre season tournament for the WBBL. Only notability it has is it is part of the WBBL. The Brisbane Heat website says it is:[3]. I might have to make a preview on Test cases on a new user subpage.Servite et contribuere (talk)15:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The lack of reporting is the problem throughout this. I'd say send the two season articles to AfD first and then consider the overall article - which has more merit or might be merged toWomen's Big Bash League where it doesn't appear to even be mentionedBlue Square Thing (talk)10:32, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment I have a preview of what it might look like if we do merge. It could do with some minor content changes. This should probably be a sandbox and is a misunderstanding of what Testcases are, but anyways, we make mistakes and learn from them. Here it is:User:Servite et contribuere/Testcases. Pinging all in discussion @Blue Square Thing @Spike 'em @Vestrian24Bio.Servite et contribuere (talk)15:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    And this is just for one season. We can do more later TBH. Of course, don't forget aboutWP:NODEADLINE.Servite et contribuere (talk)15:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd say the scorecards could be diluted further, similar to the World Cup Warm-up matches, but without the collapsible.Vestrian24Bio16:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Vestrian24Bio There is already one like this on2016–17 Big Bash League season for collapses.Servite et contribuere (talk)16:29, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Let's follow that format then, that way main fixtures will stay focused.Vestrian24Bio16:32, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    There seems way too much there. If we're going to include all the scorecards there's just simply too much information – I honestly thought they were for the main BBL competition. Personally I'd rather have two paragraphs summarising any pre-season activity – as Spike says above, scorecards are externally held data that we could link to using a reference. But then I tend to think we have far too many scorecards and far too much data held within them anywayBlue Square Thing (talk)10:32, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Blue Square Thing I don't agree with the idea of too much. Let's just create a section that can be a redirect. I just want a bit of time to look for an appropriate ATD.Servite et contribuere (talk)10:38, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Blue Square Thing Well something needs to be done.Servite et contribuere (talk)10:40, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I've edited down the base article and will add in some history stuff quickly to that. That leaves the two season articles pretty much redundant unless anyone can find any prose reporting that's worth addingBlue Square Thing (talk)10:51, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Blue Square Thing This is literally a disagreement between you and me I guess. I do favour a redirect to the season articles for pre season, but for the main article, ultimately, there is very little to merge. Not like the stats leaders and broadcasters ETC, but there isn't much content anyways. I feel like it's just about which content shall get merged.Servite et contribuere (talk)10:58, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I've sent both season articles to AfD with notes about possible redirections. That's the only way we'll get to a consensus here I think – and I think there's enough time to do so. We can think about the main article after that perhapsBlue Square Thing (talk)11:09, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The AfDs closed as merge. I've gone ahead and merged all that I think is notable – I really don't see anything more than a very brief summary as notable in either case here. Even that is largely unreferenced and almost all the referencing that there is in the parent article is from Cricket Australia. I'm not going to send it to AfD as I'm already involved, but if someone else does I'd say it'd be touch and go whether it survives – right now I'd have to vote delete based on a lack of sources. Anyway...Blue Square Thing (talk)19:58, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Regional Pro Series

    [edit]

    Could someone take a look atRegional Pro Series? I'm not at all convinced it still exists and there doesn't seem to be much sourcing. The article seems to be stuck in 2019 as far as I can tellBlue Square Thing (talk)20:19, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    As far as I looked, couldn't find a single report from an independent source, not even from2019.Vestrian24Bio03:05, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, so in 2022 there appears to have been a competition with this name, competed for by four teams: the three the article has and a Scotland Performance Academy side (CricketArchive). The same three sides played in a variety of competitions between 2010 and then, but don't appear to have played in anything since then. I'll start by trimming the article down and removing the lists of names of not particularly notable people, but I think this one might need to be redirected, perhaps to Cricket Scotland?Blue Square Thing (talk)14:21, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    2025 Hong Kong Sixes

    [edit]

    Could someone editors look this article over? I see a lot of changes made and categories removed but I don't know anything about cricket so I thought I'd ask for help here. Thanks in advance for any assistance you can offer.LizRead!Talk!08:50, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I've given it a quick look over and simplified some stuff. It looks like it's the usual "a tournament is happening so a bunch of editors want to add everything really quickly" sort of thing going on rather than anything utterly ridiculous. I've added cats, but there have been so many edits over such a short period of time that it's tricky to know what might be worth keeping. Probably worth waiting 24 hours for the rest of the results to be added before I do anything very much moreBlue Square Thing (talk)13:50, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Proposed deletion ofDubai Cricket Council Ground No 2

    [edit]
    Notice

    The articleDubai Cricket Council Ground No 2 has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

    Tagged as Unreferenced for 10 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate.

    While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

    You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

    Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Bearian (talk)02:35, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Requested move atTalk:WBBL

    [edit]

    There is an RM atTalk:WBBL that may be to the interest of members of this project.Servite et contribuere (talk)06:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Very long shot!

    [edit]

    I don't suppose anyone has a copy of the bookGeorge Brown: England's Most Complete All-Round Cricketer (2018)? It seems to be nearly impossible to get hold of. Judging by a review, it will contain information pertaining to Brown's youth and military record in WWI. Cheers!AA (talk)23:46, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Merge proposal of 2026 T20WC templates

    [edit]

    Discussion for merging of templates related to the2026 Men's T20 World Cup has started. A request to the members of the project to contribute.Cric editor (talk)08:51, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Requested move atTalk:ICC Women's Champions Trophy#Requested move 25 November 2025

    [edit]

    There is a requested move discussion atTalk:ICC Women's Champions Trophy#Requested move 25 November 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.Vestrian24Bio12:58, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    George Brown... again! - Obituary request

    [edit]

    Gale is currently down on the Wikipedia Library, so I am unable to accessThe Times digital archive on Gale. I wonder if anyone has any access that doesn't involve going via Gale and could find his obituary? He died on 3 December 1964, in Winchester. Cheers in advance.AA (talk)22:59, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Good article reassessment forCri-Zelda Brits

    [edit]

    Cri-Zelda Brits has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)04:14, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cricket&oldid=1324250957"
    Categories:
    Hidden category:

    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp