This is thetalk page for discussingWikiProject Computing and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text.Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome!Learn to edit;get help. Assume good faith Be polite andavoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seekdispute resolution if needed Shortcut WT:COMPWT:COMP

Archives (index):1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14Auto-archiving period:3 months

	This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
Computing This page is within the scope ofWikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcomputers,computing, andinformation technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing

WikiProject Computing was featured ina WikiProject Report in theSignpost on 12 June 2013.

Please opine.Headbomb {t ·c ·p ·b}04:50, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have written down the most important and pressing updates for the pageSimulationX. these summarises the recent purchase of ESI Group by Keysight Technologies along with the latest updates on the software. Below is the proposal. Can you please have it updated? We need the updated wiki page upto date to manage the overall messaging and positioning of the product. thank you.

- The infobox needs an update: Developer is now Keysight Technologies (because ESI Group who owned SimulationX was bought by Keysight in 2025.)^ The latest stable release is Version 2025.1 (4.7.2.82805, DEC 2025)^^. Current product pages is^

- In the intro para, please include that SimulationX is now developed and sold by Keysight Technologies as a part of their Design Engineering & CAE software portfolioˆ

- History: Please include the PR for last two acquisitions with the latest being by Keysight Technologies.ESI Acquires ITIGmBH &Keysight acquires ESI

- Libraries: in this section can you mention a summary of all the libraries supported. These are domain-specific libraries for mechanics and multibody systems, power transmission, electrical engineering, hydraulics and pneumatics, thermal-fluid systems, and torsional vibration analysis.^ this page summarises all the libraries in the current production versions

- Interfaces: in this section pls update the link to ‘Unigraphics/NX’ ->Siemens NX. I guess it is now part of Siemens.

- In the FEA/FEM please includePAM-Crash / VPS. This is supported by the research paper titled “FMI Based Integration of System Simulation and FEM for efficient Simulation of Realistic Crash Scenarios” presented at the NAFEMS World Congress 2023 (refer)

- Can you add a new section : Licensing In this section we need to mention a modular, the token based licensing model for SimulationX which helps users of all sizes to use specific functional modules and domain libraries according to their requirements.^

MajidNas (talk)04:45, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ransomware has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)02:55, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please add reliable sources.Bearian (talk)04:46, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The proposal can be found on theGrafana Talk page. Please participate or provide feedback by adding to the discussion.Vidamon (talk)05:10, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I was hoping to engage the right group about evaluating the reliability of howtogeek.com and thenewstack.io, then getting the resulting consensus added to the right place (e.g.WP:RS). I couldn't find aWP:RS-style list in the Computing nor Software projects, but I did finda smaller list in the FOSS task force. Is there something that I'm missing, or isWP:RS it?

I found a previous discussion on HTGhere, so not sure if I should be just starting a new topic there, or if I should be engaging members of this Project (or a sub-project) first?WidgetKid^{chat me}20:35, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion atTalk:PNY Technologies#Requested move 6 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.Vestrian24Bio08:25, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Cloud computing is barely referenced within this WikiProject, despite being a significant part of modern computing. I actively contribute to articles related to cloud computing, cloud service providers and I would like to participate in WikiProject Computing with a focus on these areas. I am considering proposing that cloud computing be explicitly included in the project scope, to better reflect current editorial practice. Before doing so, I would like to ask whether this requires prior consensus on the talk page or whether a direct edit would be appropriate.Azarboon (talk)09:19, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think that can be added boldly and I have done so. If there is enough interest, we can even build a taskforce for it. ~Kvng (talk)14:47, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sorry for the intrusion, but I was wondering if I could get some assistance on a draft article I've been putting together forcyberdecks. I don't have a ton of experience with the technical ins-and-outs of the topic and would appreciate the expertise!Superraptor123 (talk)21:15, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at it.Techguy7370 (talk)14:39, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please add reliable sources.Bearian (talk)22:46, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion atTalk:CBP One#Requested move 28 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.TarnishedPath^talk09:30, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There was lots of talk about improving this article back in 2017, and then ...Bearian (talk)11:16, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please add reliable sources to this stub.Bearian (talk)22:07, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix the multiple issues, or propose it for deletion.Bearian (talk)08:53, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion atTalk:Twitter#Requested move 9 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.TarnishedPath^talk11:45, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please resolve the issues tagged.Bearian (talk)20:25, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion atTalk:IPad (A16)#Requested move 4 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.TarnishedPath^talk14:33, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion atTalk:Palantir Technologies#Requested move 5 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.TarnishedPath^talk10:20, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion atTalk:Global Connectivity Index#Requested move 29 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.TarnishedPath^talk10:23, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Notable or not?Bearian (talk)02:42, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

MacBook Pro has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)18:10, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Project-Class Computing pages
• NA-importance Computing pages
• All Computing articles