This is thetalk page for discussingWikiProject College football and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text.Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome!Learn to edit;get help. Assume good faith Be polite andavoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seekdispute resolution if needed

Archives (index):1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29Auto-archiving period:45 days

	This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
College football This page is within the scope ofWikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcollege football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football

WikiProject College football was featured ina WikiProject Report in theSignpost on 22 November 2010.

There is a discussion atWikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Football_League#Infobox_for_former_players_turned_college_coach that editors may be interested in participating.-UCO2009bluejay (talk)18:08, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that all college football coaches should be moved to the gridiron biography coach infobox.-UCO2009bluejay (talk)22:37, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SeeWT:NFL#Full college team names in the infobox-UCO2009bluejay (talk)03:17, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jweiss11:,@Cbl62:-UCO2009bluejay (talk)12:33, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Denard Robinson has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)00:56, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NotJamestack (talk)12:56, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting questions posed by this AfD. It would be good to get input fromgridiron football editors, especially those with an interest inhigh school football.Cbl62 (talk)15:05, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened a discussion onTalk:2025 NCAA Division I FBS football rankings#How to list Memphis in CFP rankings?Admanny (talk)19:58, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Clayton Kershaw has an RfC for the discussion of championship recognition involving the websiteSports Reference andWP:LOCALCONSENSUS in wikiprojects.. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments onthe discussion page. Thank you.PK-WIKI (talk)16:46, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed a user, @BrickChism, adding statistics to the infoboxes for collegiate quarterbacks (such asGunner Stockton andJoey Aguilar), akin to the career statistics in NFL infoboxes. Is this something we're doing now?Bulldawg (talk)21:09, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Churning career stats weekly is page history clutter. There's not much notability to career stats at any level, save for a small set of "magic" numbers. —Bagumba (talk)21:15, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it'd be nice to add them for collegiate quarterbacks like it is for NFL quarterbacks. However, if you don't feel that they are necessary, then I can remove them.BrickChism (talk)22:06, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The websiteCollege Poll Archive has been listed atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments onthe discussion page. Thank you.PK-WIKI (talk)06:34, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1997 Michigan Wolverines football team has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)01:17, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I had a question on college football game summaries. For a home game, should I do the section as "vs [team]" or just "Team" to reflect the CFB schedule template. Also, for the stats for players, should I do for example "Player | 15/32, 169 yards, 1 TD" or "Player | 15/32, 169 yards, TD" removing the number one from before the TD?TheGreatestBigC (talk)15:20, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The examples atWikipedia:WikiProject College football/Style guide § Team seasons (content) don't have "at" or "vs". Adding those seems like a recent phenomena to litter headers with schedule minutiae. And if we followedMOS:HEADINGS, it'd have to be "Vs." and "At". —Bagumba (talk)16:35, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This would be the example I listed first.

Now, the second example.

Notice I removed the "vs" from the top and removed the number 1 in front of the "TD" and "INT"

Which one should I do?TheGreatestBigC (talk)17:13, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleSouth Carolina–Tennessee football rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Carolina–Tennessee football rivalry (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

OceanGunfish (talk)16:44, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Project-Class college football pages
• NA-importance college football pages
• Wikipedia pages with to-do lists