This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Latter Day Saint movement This page is within the scope ofWikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofMormonism and theLatter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement

Archives

Index1,2,3,4

This page has archives. Sections older than180 days may be auto-archived byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.

In the third reference in this article there is a guide cited. This is an unbias reference for originations(such as Wikipedia) to follow. It states:

"While the term “Mormon Church” has long been publicly applied to the Church as a nickname, it is not an authorized title, and the Church discourages its use. Thus, please avoid using the abbreviation “LDS” or the nickname “Mormon” as substitutes for the name of the Church, as in “Mormon Church,” “LDS Church,” or “Church of the Latter-day Saints.”

Thus seems pretty clear that using LDS Church is inaccurate, biased, and somewhat offensive. These are all tenants that Wikipedia strives to combat. Thus organization strives for the most accurate information that can be obtained from its collective. It also works tirelessly to provide users with unbias articles that are free of political agendas. Furthermore, the last thing Wikipedia is about is attempting to be a platform for offensive articles. It only attempts to state facts and truth, and allow the reader to make connections and opinions. Nevertheless, this Manual of Style is clearly not adhering to these tenants, even AFTER citing the very source it conflicts with.

This needs to be updated. According to this church's information, it chooses to NOT be called the LDS Church, but that is the exact thing this Manual of Style insists its editors to use. This needs to change in order to agree with the foundational principles of Wikipedia, or else it jeopardizes Wikipedia's credibility.JaysonsmithNP (talk)03:55, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia follows convention, it doesn't lead. All of the major publishing institutions, like the Associated Press, still use "LDS Church". If you can find a single Manual of Style (not published by the church), then I think you would have more success changing the MOS here. Something else you can do is to recommend a satisfactory alternative. The recommended alternatives by the church are "Church of Jesus Christ" and "restored Church of Jesus Christ", which are problematic for obvious reasons. Same thing with the church's desired alternative for "Mormonism", which is "the restored gospel of Jesus Christ".Epachamo (talk)09:34, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Epachamo, the Associated Press stopped using "LDS Church" over four years ago. It even posted anannouncement on its Twitter feed (among other places). Even if we ignore that many Latter-day Saints have always felt "LDS Church" to be a slur, I think we're long past the point where others have yet to respect that.TheOtter (talk)21:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a link to the AP style guide section where it discusses this? I'd get on board with it if we can find a couple good style guides. Looking at recent AP articles about the church, it doesn't look like they are following it if it is there.Epachamo (talk)08:01, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Epachamo@TheOtter I have access to the AP style guide through my University Library subscriptions. Here are some block quotes from the section titledChurch of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, The I hope this helps to clarify.

...capitalization and punctuation of "Latter-day...

...Use the full name of the church on first references, with the church, church members, members of the faith preferred on second and later reference. When necessary for space or clarity or in quotations or proper names,Mormon, Mormons andLatter-day Saints are acceptable.

...The termMormon is based on the church’s sacred Book of Mormon and remains in common use by members of the faith. When using the church’s full name, include a short explanation such as,the church, widely known as the Mormon church ...

...The termMormon is not properly applied to the other Latter Day Saints churches that resulted from the splits after Smith’s death. This includes groups that call themselves “fundamentalist...”
— Associated Press,"Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, The",Associated Press Stylebook (March 8, 2019) Emphasis included in original.

-Jmjosh9003:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, @Jmjosh90. So @Epachamo, according to AP, the only times "M*rmon" or "M*rmons" would be acceptable are:

• for space. Does anyone believe Wikipedia is strapped for space?
• for clarity. Obviously this is fine, but I would think it completely covered by the next quoted sentence: "When using the church’s full name, include a short explanation such as,the church, widely known as the Mormon church." Given the linked nature of Wikipedia, I would think it sufficient to include something like this in the Church's main article and nowhere else. However, I could deal with a single instance in other articles, as needed. Can you think of any reason any more would be necessary?
• in quotations. Obviously, this is both appropriate and correct.
• in proper names. This is also (probably more so) correct.

So, I suspect of these four points, the only one that requires any discussion is "for clarity". Thoughts on this?

TheOtter (talk)12:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are overstating how the Associated Press manual of style is used. In their articles, they still use "Mormon" in the title without quotations, and even in the body without quotations whenever a distinction is needed. Outside of the intermountain west, the word "Mormon" is still needed for clarity's sake to know who you are talking about. The vast majority of articles on BBC, New York Times, Associated Press, Salt Lake Tribune still use the term "Mormon" because it is needed for clarity. As an editor I rarely see the term "Mormon" and don't see this as a serious issue on Wikipedia. Can you point to an article where you feel it is an issue?Epachamo (talk)02:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good discussion on here. The first class of places on WP that I would like to see "Mormon" changed is in disambiguation in article titles. Current style rule says:

• When a leader of theChurch of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has the same name as people outside theLatter Day Saint movement, the person may be disambiguated with the parenthetical(Mormon). See, for example,John W. Taylor (Mormon) andGeorge Reynolds (Mormon).

I think it's worth reconsidering this sometime soon. I think switching to, e.g.,Martin Harris (Latter Day Saints) would be an improvement.

The OP has valid points about it being potentially offensive that WP mostly doesn't follow the church's style guide regarding its own name, while very strictly adhering to other peoples' and groups' preferences regarding their preferred names.

I know there are other factors at play, but I think WP can and should do better than it is.Davemc0 (talk)03:20, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, with the recent library of congress subject heading change (to not use the word "Mormon"), one of our catalogers here in the BYU Library, Bob Maxwell, created a webpage to assist in the searching of various denominations within the Latter Day Saint movement. You can read ithere. It could be useful for us if we are looking for ways other institutions talk about churches within the movement.Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk)15:36, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed some page titles include the full name of the church such asList of temples of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints by geographic region and some contain a shortened version such as the example's child pageList of temples in the United States (LDS Church).

Additional examples using official name of the church:

• List of temples of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
• Membership statistics of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
• Membership history of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
• The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and politics in the United States
• The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Utah

Examples using "[topic] (LDS Church)" format include:

• Area (LDS Church)
• District (LDS Church)
• Priesthood (LDS Church)
• Sunday School (LDS Church)
• Temples (LDS Church)

The official church position is to use the full name, but "LDS Church" is commonly used outside the church. The shortened version is more concise, uses less memory space, and simpler to read. I see standards directing use within an article, but not the title.

Is there a standard on how a title should be displayed? If not, should there be a standard?

Thanks -Dmm1169 (talk)19:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For a great example of a Wikipedia article that abuses theMOS:LDS spirit of the policy, please refer toMormons. I tried addressing my concerns at an earlier discussion inTalk:Mormons § We are not mormons. we are members of the church of jesus christ of latter day saints, but was directed toWP:LDS. I felt the MOS page made more sense. My feeling, WP policy intends to be inclusive of all groups while not offending. The articleMormons, even by its very title, seems unnecessarily offensive. —TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹(Tadg^Talk-Email)22:41, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Project-Class Latter Day Saint movement pages
• NA-importance Latter Day Saint movement pages
• WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement articles