Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Arbitration enforcement request referral: Indian military history | none | (orig. case) | 8 May 2025 |
Amendment request: Arbitration motion regarding Ritchie333 and Praxidicae | Motion | none | 20 May 2025 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
This noticeboard's primary purpose is to to attract the attention of the clerks to a particular matter by non-clerks. Non-clerksare welcome to comment on this page in the event that the clerks appear to have missed something.
The clerks may be contacted privately, in the event a matter could not be prudently addressed publicly (i.e., on this page), by composing an email toclerks-llists.wikimedia.org; only the clerk team and individual arbitrators have access to emails sent to that list.
A procedural reference for clerks (and arbitrators) is available atWikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Clerks/Procedures.
|
This page has archives. Sections older than4 days may be automatically archived byClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Arbitrators, clerks and trainees: Please coordinate your actions through the mailing list. The purpose of this page is for editors who are not clerks to request clerk assistance.
I find myself fairly regularly navigating toWikipedia:Contentious topics § Appeals and amendments, either to double-check a rule or to link a user to it in the course of sanctioning them. Would it be possible to add a shortcut to that section, maybeWP:CTOPAPPEALS? (I could create the shortcut myself, but there's not much point if there isn't a{{shortcut}} box at the target.) --Tamzin[cetacean needed](they|xe|🤷)18:54, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Am I allowed to add a potentially relavent source to a talk page for a contentious topic?AFanOfTheWanderingInnNumber25 (talk)16:49, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]