Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2021-09-26/Community view

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost |2021-09-26
Is writing Wikipedia like making a quilt?: Help us piece together WikiProject Craft!
The Signpost

Community view

Is writing Wikipedia like making a quilt?

Mary Mark Ockerbloom is the co-host ofPhiladelphia WikiSalon andWikipedian in Residence forAnnual Reviews. Dilettante Army is anArt+Feminism organizer. Pharos is long time member ofWikimedia New York City.
A 1979 quilt byLucy Mingo of Gee's Bend, Alabama, with a nine-patch center block surrounded by pieced strips

Information about craft is almost nonexistent in Wikipedia and Wikidata. With a view to stitching up that gap,Wikimedia New York City members have startedWikipedia:WikiProject Craft, hostingCraft+Wikipedia Roundtable sessions with theTextile Society of America. Putting together a new WikiProject involves piecing together many different contributions—much like piecing together a quilt. We hope you'll contribute and explore the world of craft!

Craft is the creation of objects using human hands. It is practiced by professional artists, tradespeople, amateurs and enthusiasts with a spectrum of skills and vision. Craft artists work with traditional craft materials and practices in fields such asglassblowing,pottery,jewelry,textile arts,woodworking andmetalworking. The studio movement is part of a broader world of craft where boundaries blur between hobbyists, makers, specialists, and artists.

With one hand, craftspeople hold firmly to tools, techniques and traditions that have been practiced for generations to create practical, usable objects. With the other hand, they reach for inspiration and imagination. They may make objects that are both beautiful and utilitarian, like thequilts of Gee's Bend, or that only reference utility, like a spun-glass wedding dress displayed at theCorning Glass Museum.

The invisibility of craft on Wikipedia

Craft has historically been defined in opposition to both industry and fine art. TheArts and Crafts movement in Britain began in response to theIndustrial Revolution, as craftspeople sought to maintain control and authority over their work. Craft is often divided fromfine art because of its utility and the class status of its practitioners. Objects made in a domestic context have been gendered as women's work. Craft's roots often have been categorized infolk art,naïve art, andprimitive art. The work of non-European cultures has a long history of treatment as craft rather than fine art, reflecting bias in European and North American anthropology. Contemporary craftspeople and artists draw on these histories, often reclaiming the pride and skill of handwork, the value of domestic labor, and art forms developed by non-white cultures.

All this may help to explain why there is an information gap around craft on Wikipedia and Wikidata. That lack of information perpetuates the field’s invisibility.

Craft Horizons cover,Emile Norman, 1949, No copyright renewal

One way to find out more is to look at craft publications. American craft developed in the early 1900s as a successor to European craft movements.Aileen Osborn Webb founded theAmerican Craft Council in 1943 and published the magazinesCraft Horizons (1941-1979) andAmerican Craft (1979-). More specialist publications includeStudio Potter.Metalsmith,The Journal of Modern Craft,Studio: Craft and Design in Canada,Selvedge,Surface Design Journal,Textile: The Journal of Cloth and Culture,Threads,Textile Research Journal,Glass: The UrbanGlass Quarterly,Journal of Glass Studies,Art Jewelry Forum,Ceramics Monthly,Ceramic Review, andGlaze magazine.

There are Wikipedia articles onAmerican craft as a movement andCraft Horizons, but almost none for other magazines. Coverage of craft artists remains sparse.Category:Women in craft has 12 sub-categories. Wikipedia knows about 297 “Women textile artists” (down from 310 last year) and 201 “Women potters” but only 44 “Women metalsmiths”, 48 "Women silversmiths"‎, 16 “Women woodcarvers” and 8 “Women stone carvers” (down from 10) worldwide.

Mariska Karasz, fromCraft Horizons, 1949, No copyright renewal

Craft journals are a rich source of information on the history of craft. They can be used to identify, expand, and create Wikidata entities and Wikipedia articles about artists, techniques, tools and other subjects. Some of them, includingCraft Horizons (1941-1979) andAmerican Craft magazine (1979-1990) are freely available online. You can also find sources through theWikipedia Library. (See Introduction to the Wikipedia Library c/oPhiladelphia WikiSalon.) Older magazines may not haverenewed their copyrights, making them a potential source of images forWikimedia Commons.

Getting started

The goals of Wikiproject:Craft are to increase visibility and usability of information about craft, to fill content gaps and create a long-lasting framework of basic information about craft.

Identifying topics

What craft information would you like to find on Wikipedia? Since this is a new project, we've just started to create templates for categorizing articles. You can help tagging topics. Search Wikipedia for a topic that you think is important to craft, like a publication, organization, artist, movement, technique or tool. If there is a Wikipedia article on the topic, paste{{WikiProject Craft}} at the top of the article's talk page. You can rate an article to indicate how well developed it is, how important it is, and whether it needs photographs, e.g.{{WikiProject Craft |class=Start |importance=Low |needs-image=yes }} If you don't find a Wikipedia article, suggest one atWikipedia:WikiProject Craft or create a Wikidata item.

Expanding Wikidata

Wikidata supports description asstructured data, computer-readable statements that identify and connect people, places, things and ideas. Wikidata can be searched and queried, but it only knows something if we describe it. You can develop your skills on Wikidata much like a craftsperson, with each object you create.

Wikidata entities can be created for almost anything you can think of and connected together and to references.WikiProject sum of all paintings has done an excellent job on a traditionally-valued fine art, but much of craft remains undefined and underdeveloped. Relevant properties for craft on Wikidata includeproduct or material produced(P1056),practiced by(P3095) andintangible cultural heritage status(P3259). Craft information on Wikidata can be used to generate lists of topics, to find craft artists, and to improve or create new Wikipedia articles.

Screenshot from the Wikidata entityQuilting. Consider the cultural assumptions behind this photo.

Partnerships and events

Wikipedia projects and others often generate lists of topics from Wikidata for use as worklists and in research. Adding craft information to Wikidata will help WikiProject Craft to partner with other groups to organize events, either online or in person.

Existing project groups on Wikipedia likeWikipedia:WikiProject Textile Arts,Art+Feminism, andWomen in Red are good candidates for event partners.Many art institutions, libraries, galleries and museums are interested in craft, and som have partnered with Wikipedia in the past, such as theNational Museum of Women in the Arts and thePhiladelphia Museum of Art. TheSmithsonian and others have even hiredWikipedians in residence. Talk to people at your local institutions about ways to improve Wikiproject Craft.

If you're a teacher, consider whether this could be relevant to a class.WikiEdu works with teachers and university classes to expand Wikipedia and Wikidata.

Images! Images! Images!

It's incredibly difficult to convey an idea of a visual object without a visual image. Images can be saved onWikimedia Commons (where Wikipedia stores its images) under either of two conditions. First, an image can be in thepublic domain, no longer undercopyright. Second, it can be released with the permission of the copyright holder under acopyright license that allows others to freely reuse the image in any way they wish, including commercially.

Freely released images

If you've taken a photograph yourself, you own the copyright of that photograph, and you can release it on Wikipedia. See Adding your own photo to Wikimedia Commons.

You can't take a photograph of someone else's artwork and release it without their permission. They hold a copyright in the underlying work.Some artists, likeJan Yager, have released images of their own works, or of works in progress, on Wikimedia Commons. It would be very exciting to see more artists photographing and releasing images of their tools and process!

  • American Ruff in Progress by Jan Yager
    American Ruff – City Flotsam by Jan Yager, as a work in progress
  • American Ruff by Jan Yager
    American Ruff – City Flotsam, 2000, by Jan Yager, finished work

It can be hard to take a good photograph of yourself even if you're an artist. If someone else takes a photograph of you, they own the copyright, not you.Black Lunch Table has brought their own photographers to events to take and release photographs of artists who attend, with their permission. This would be great for future in-person craft artist events!

Black Lunch Table photobooth at High Line 15

Public domain images

Copyright law differs for each country, and United States copyright law is complicated. That said, as of January 1, 2021, books and magazines published prior to 1926 entered the public domain in the United States. Each year onPublic Domain Day, another year is released. Also, books and magazine issues published in the United States up to December 31, 1963, had to register renewals to retain their copyrights. Works that did not renew have also entered the public domain. The images below are in the public domain.

Various projects are making copyright renewals easier to check. You can see if a journal renewed its issues viaThe Online Books Page first renewals list (up to 1950) andPenn Libraries deep backfiles, which uses Wikidata to track renewals of journals. View Adding a public domain photo to Wikimedia Commons or attend the WikiSalon workshop onDemystifying Copyright atWikiConference North America 2021.

Everyone is welcome!

We hope you'll contribute and share thisSignpost article! Please help us to fit the pieces ofWikipedia:WikiProject Craft together to create something both beautiful and useful.

We also hope to have a session at the upcomingWikiConference North America October 8-10.

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automaticallytranscluded from this article'stalk page. To follow comments,add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can trypurging the cache.
  • It's really interesting to hear about WikiProject Craft! I'm a knitter myself and what I've mostly noticed about craft-related content is that what's on Wikipedia is mostly uncited and written in the early 2000s. But that's from my glances as a reader, I haven't really edited the topic much. Part of it is because I think the best sources for those wouldn't nessecarily be online but in more specialized craft magazines/books (which I don't have many of), especially since a lot of online content is more tutorial/how-to in nature in contrast to what you would be writing about in an encyclopedia.Clovermoss(talk)00:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The whole area of the applied ordecorative arts, of which "craft" is a particular (rather modern, rather Western) slice, is extremely weak on WP, despite many of the more general articles we have getting rather strong views. I hope this new effort avoids concentrating on individual producers too much - these get far fewer views.Johnbod (talk)03:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Will WikiProject Craft also encompass the ~700 articles (according to transclusion count of the banner template) from the now-defunctWikiProject Woodworking, given thatwoodworking appears to fall into its bounds?eviolite(talk)17:24, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've been hoovering up Japanese crafts articles for a while now - the issue I've come across, as I have for many of the textile arts articles, is that several haven't been touched since their inception between 2008 and 2012, resulting in a lack of wikilinks, roughshod writing style and tone, and a lack of references (or inappropriate ones). Many articles are complete orphans, and I'd imagine the same is true for several crafts articles and topics covering those from countries that do not speak English - for example, the articleJapanese clothing during the Meiji period only just got created (thank you,Jevella!), but the articleVictorian fashion, which covers a timespan some 30 years wider than the Meiji period, was created in2002.
    If any editors are interested in improving our crafts articles, I'd love them to keep in mind that non-Western craft articles often need even more love - the addition oflanguage tags (like{{transl}} and{{lang}}), good referencing, etc. The world is obviously huge, so even focusing on the crafts of one country is enough effort - if everyone did as such, we could have a good run at it. --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk)16:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Though I will note - not every English-language source on the crafts of non-English speaking countries is made equal. I've managed to sift out the worst offenders for Japanese articles and am pretty happy with the sourcing and information we have on, say,kimono, but, having briefly had them on my watchlist, articles likehanfu andqipao need much more work - even for basic things like the definition of and their origins.
      I know where I would go to find the right sources on these - English-language information on foreign clothing online is weirdly spread out, information on Chinese fashion and sources on I can find on Tumblr, but Vietnamese clothing information I think I'd have to go to Facebook for - but you'd really need your wits about you to grapple with those articles, and that isn't something I have the time or necessary existing information to do well. Contributors who know both English and other languages, are familiar with crafts from those countries, and have the time to make some worthwhile, highly-necessary edits are something we are in short supply of at times. --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk)16:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • A great article on a subject area Wikipedia has a systemic bias against. —Bilorv (talk)16:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • We don't have a "systemic bias", we just don't have many editors interested in the area.Johnbod (talk)17:27, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      I don't think it'sjust that simple. :) Our description ofsystemic bias describes it as, "the inherent tendency of a process to support particular outcomes". So if the English Wikipedia community doesn't support editors interested in this area – attracting and sustaining their participation – that's a bias. One where our support systems work against the outcomes we desire. In this case seeing the subject area of crafting present within our collective work. Given that crafting is just one amonga long list of challenges we face I argue it's a just description.Ckoerner (talk)18:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      And what exactly creates the "inherent tendency" in WP to not have editors interested in this area, and how could our "support systems" remedy this? In fact, as someone who works a lot in the decorative arts area (as I prefer to call it), it is in many ways much easier than other areas, not least because you are normally able to get on with it almost completely undisturbed.Johnbod (talk)21:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      Oh, youdo work for the WMF - your vocabulary made me suspect as much!Johnbod (talk)21:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      And what exactly creates the "inherent tendency" in WP to not have editors interested in this area – Our gender and class systemic biases. It's right there in the article:Craft is often divided from fine art because of its utility and the class status of its practitioners. Objects made in a domestic context have been gendered as women's work. With a project of this size, there's not just coincidentally going to be significantly fewer people interested in a huge topic area for no reason. —Bilorv (talk)23:08, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      And these are Wikipedia's biases? The "bias" towards "fine art" has been ingrained for many centuries. Blame Vasari if you must. Is the huge over-representation of sport Wikipedia's fault, and how can the WMF put people off writing about it? Actually the great majority of the workers/artisans/artists creating the sort of stuff I write about were men.Johnbod (talk)04:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      I don't think that a community failing to attract and sustain participation in a given area is the same as its processes tending to support particular outcomes. I think the concept of systemic bias would be spread too thin if it were applied to any area that didn't get enough participation, as all shortfalls in content would then be covered by it. I would agree though that there is a self-selection bias that affects what gets written about, which is related to attracting editors with different areas of interest and ties back to what Johnbod said. What is more of a systemic problem is that appropriate source material for an encyclopedia article is easier to find for some topic areas, such as those with a lot of online media coverage, and thus it's relatively easier to get more volunteers to write about those topics.isaacl (talk)20:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikipedia is a place where random strangers are allowed to tell each other to f off. Fix that first, then you might attract people who are interested in crafts enough to want to learn how to edit Wikipedia articles on craft, and more importantly, how to do it well. Until then, they will always be deserted wastelands where people like Johnbod go for their Wikipedia down time.Cony Island Kook (talk)23:16, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well they are often not deserted by the readers, just the editors.Johnbod (talk)04:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Get the latest headlines on your user page – just add{{Signpost-subscription}}.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2021-09-26/Community_view&oldid=1193880191"
Category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp