| ThisWikiProject, an open group of Wikipedia editors, is believed to besemi-active. Although there may be fewer editors here than in the past, anyone is welcome to participate in the group or toleave a message for us. Remove the |Semi-active parameter from this template ifactivity resumes or if this tag was changed in error. If almost no activity occurs in this WikiProject, consider replacing this tag with{{WikiProject status|Inactive}}. |
Welcome toWikiProject Inline Templates. This collaboration is dedicated to improving Wikipedia's inlineneutrality- andattribution-cleanup,dispute, andfootnote templates. This page andits subpages contain their suggestions and various resources; it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of other Wikipedians interested in the topic. If you would like to help, please join the project by adding your name to the list ofparticipants. Membership merely signifies your interest in inline templates and members are under no obligation to do anything; however, theto-do list is a good place to actually starting helping out.
Note that "inline" is used here in the sense of "within text" rather than "directly from another server".
See archives ofTemplate talk:Citation needed for some reasons why this project is needed.
|
If you discover a "new" inline template, no matter how old it is,please add it to the "New inline templates" section below, so that it can be processed (checked for proper categorization, etc.)
Superscripted:
{{According to whom}} →[according to whom?]{{Anachronism inline}} →[anachronism]{{Attribution needed}} →[attribution needed]{{Copy edit inline}} →[needs copy edit]{{by whom}} →[by whom?] – a grammatical variant of{{who}}{{Full citation needed}} →[full citation needed]{{Citation needed}} →[citation needed]{{Quote without source}} →[This quote needs a citation]{{Clarify}} →[clarification needed] – subst'd variants that provide a|reason= that describe how to provides better reference citations{{Contradictory inline}} →[contradictory]{{Dead link}} →[dead link]{{Disambiguation needed}} →[disambiguation needed]{{Disputed inline}} →[disputed –discuss]{{Dubious}} →[dubious –discuss]{{Explain}} →[further explanation needed]{{Episode needed}} →[episode needed]{{Failed verification}} →[failed verification]{{Unbalanced opinion}} →[unbalanced opinion?]{{Medical citation needed}} →[medical citation needed]{{Unreliable medical source}} →[unreliable medical source?]{{Non sequitur}} →[non sequitur]{{Nonspecific}} →[not specific enough to verify]{{Note}} →[[#ref_{{{1}}}|^]]{{Note label}} →‡{{Original research inline}} →[original research?]{{Page needed}} →[page needed]{{POV statement}} →[neutrality isdisputed]{{Primary source inline}} →[non-primary source needed] - for signalling that a non-primary source is needed{{Ref}} →[1]{{Ref label}} →[[#endnote_{{{1}}}|[{{{2}}}]]]‡{{Registration required}} →(registration required){{Request quotation}} →[need quotation to verify]{{Reference page}} →{{Season needed}} →[season and episode needed]{{Specify}} →[specify]{{Synthesis inline}} →[improper synthesis?]{{Technical inline}} →[jargon]{{Unreliable source?}} →[unreliable source?]{{Update after}} →[needs update]‡‡{{Vague}} →[vague]{{Verify source}} →[verification needed]{{Volume needed}} →[volume & issue needed]{{Weasel inline}} →[weasel words]{{Where}} →[where?]{{Who}} →[who?]{{Who2}} →[who?]{{Year needed}} →[year needed]Meta-templates:
Deprecated (no longer used):
Noteworthy for features:
Needed:
Related software functions inCite.php that aren't templates:
Non-superscripted:
Similar but out-of-scope (for now?):A number of templates are, technically, used inline, but for purposes very different from those that concern this project (at present).
{{issue needed|c=y}}, and name is too generic, because{{issue}} is entirely comic-books-specific (according to the doc page however the template itself is completely generic except for the category it adds).:* indentation used by{{note label}} references. There are a pair of templates,{{refbegin}} and{{refend}}, related to{{reflist}}, which solve this misalignment problem, to an extent (see "Option 3..." atTemplate:Refbegin documentation for usage), in that they match the <references /> indentation. They are untested with{{note label}}, but work fine with "* Reference details here"-style manually-added general sources in the References section.Recommendation: Have developers modify <references /> to not indent, or at worst to match ":"-level indentation, and modify{{refbegin}} and{{refend}} to conform.Please feel free to list new inline templates here (newest at the top, please). It is advisable to propose new inline templates atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Inline Templates before creating them, so as to ensure that there is consensus that they are needed and will not unnecessarily overlap in function with others. Once templates have been checked for standard{{Fix}} usage, categorization inCategory:Inline templates, and other issues, they should be moved to the main list, above.
{{better source}} or uncertain{{unreliable source?}}.⇒[obsolete source]{{Citation needed|date=February 2026}}Internal