 |
| Project pages |
|---|
|
Assessment |
Welcome to theassessment department of theWikiProject on Football, which focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia'sAssociation football related articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in theWP:1.0 programme.
The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the{{WikiProject Football}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories ofCategory:Football articles by quality andCategory:Football articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for anautomatically generated worklist.
An article's quality assessment is recorded using the|class= parameter in the {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Articles that have the{{WikiProject Football}} banner template on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.
The following standard grades may be used to describe the quality of mainspace articles (seeWikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
| FA | (forfeatured articlesonly; adds them to theFA-Class football articles category) |  FA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FL | (forfeatured listsonly; adds them to theFL-Class football articles category) | FL | |
| A | (for articles that passed a formalpeer reviewonly; adds them to theA-Class football articles category) |  A | |
| GA | (forgood articlesonly; adds them to theGA-Class football articles category) |  GA | |
| B | (for articles that satisfy all of theB-Class criteria; adds them to theB-Class football articles category) | B | |
| C | (for substantial articles; adds them to theC-Class football articles category) | C | |
| Start | (for developing articles; adds them to theStart-Class football articles category) | Start | |
| Stub | (for basic articles; adds them to theStub-Class football articles category) | Stub | |
| List | (forstand-alone lists; adds them to theList-Class football articles category) | List | |
| NA | (for any other pages where assessment is unwarranted; adds them to theNA-Class football pages category) | NA | |
| ??? | (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in theUnassessed football articles category) | ??? |
For non-mainspace content, the following values may be used:
| Category | (forcategories; adds them to theCategory-Class football pages category) | Category | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Draft | (fordrafts; adds them to theDraft-Class football pages category) | Draft | |
| File | (forfiles andtimed text; adds them to theFile-Class football pages category) | File | |
| Portal | (forportal pages; adds them to thePortal-Class football pages category) | Portal | |
| Project | (forproject pages; adds them to theProject-Class football pages category) | Project | |
| Template | (fortemplates andmodules; adds them to theTemplate-Class football pages category) | Template |
The following non-standard assessment grades for mainspace content may be used at a WikiProject's discretion:
| Disambig | (fordisambiguation pages; adds them to theDisambig-Class football pages category) | Disambig | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redirect | (forredirect pages; adds them to theRedirect-Class football pages category) | Redirect |
An article's importance assessment is generated from theimportance parameter in the{{WikiProject Football}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for theimportance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (seeWikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
| Top (adds articles toCategory:Top-importance football articles) | Top | |
| High (adds articles toCategory:High-importance football articles) | High | |
| Mid (adds articles toCategory:Mid-importance football articles) | Mid | |
| Low (adds articles toCategory:Low-importance football articles) | Low | |
| NA (adds articles toCategory:NA-importance football articles) | NA | |
| ??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed inCategory:Unknown-importance football articles) | ??? |
| Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | The article has attainedfeatured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers fromWP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets thefeatured article criteria: Afeatured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting thepolicies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
| Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Belgium national football team (as of December 2016) |
| FL | The article has attainedfeatured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers fromWP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets thefeatured list criteria:
| Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of Ipswich Town F.C. statistics and records (as of February 2008) |
| A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets theA-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described inWikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as afeatured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g.WikiProject Military history). | Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving.WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
| GA | The article meetsall of thegood article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers fromWP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria Agood article is:
| Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existingfeatured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Abby Wambach (as of January 2014) |
| B | The article meetsall of theB-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reachgood article standards. More detailed criteria
| Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with theManual of Style and relatedstyle guidelines. | Gareth Bale (as of April 2014) |
| C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantialcleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow. | Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solvecleanup problems. | Women's association football (as of November 2013) |
| Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
| Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references toreliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Improve the grammar, spelling, and writing style; decrease the use of jargon. | Steven Kinniburgh (as of March 2012) |
| Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Ji Xiang (as of January 2012) |
| List | Meets the criteria of astand-alone list orset index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of A.S. Roma players (as of February 2008) |
| Label | Base criteria | Football-related criteria | Examples |
| Top | Article is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for articles that have achieved international notability within its subject or field. | Articles strictly related to the game: rules of the game, positions, confederations, etc. | Association football Offside (football) UEFA |
| High | Article is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent. | Teams with international notability. Top-level leagues, awards and competitions. Top-rated world-class players and managers. | AFC Ajax Cristiano Ronaldo UEFA Champions League |
| Mid | Article is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. | Teams with nationwide notability. Players or managers that have participated at international level or in a top-level league. Mid-level leagues. | A.S. Roma Swiss Super League Gareth Barry |
| Low | Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article. | Any other player, manager or team. Football-related lists, season articles. | Leek Town F.C. Roberto Biffi List of Arsenal F.C. players |
The proportion of all articles with an assessed project banner is:
99.4% assessed(estimate: some more article talk pages may still need a banner)
The proportion of all articles with known importance is:
95.3% known importance(estimate: some more articles may still need importance to be assessed)
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please useWikipedia:Peer review instead.
| 2012 answered assessments |
|---|
|
| 2013 answered assessments |
|---|
Rajnish (talk)08:39, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
| 2014 answered assessments |
|---|
|
| 2015 answered assessments |
|---|
|
| 2016 answered assessments |
|---|
|
| 2017 answered assessments |
|---|
|
| 2018 answered assessments |
|---|
|
| 2019 answered assessments |
|---|
for all of these 6 I have been a major editor, so feel that i'mtoo close to make any change to assessment class. Cheers.Matilda Maniac (talk)15:17, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
|
| 2020 answered assessments |
|---|
|
| 2021 answered assessments |
|---|
-NoahRiffe (talk)15:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
-Kelsiesmith7 (talk)22:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
| 2022 answered assessments |
|---|
Thank you,Ach.de.graf
|
| 2023 answered assessments |
|---|
|
| 2024 answered assessments |
|---|
|
Not done No change, was already assessed as start. --Christiangamer7 (talk)05:29, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply] Not done No change, was already assessed as start. --Christiangamer7 (talk)05:29, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply] Not done Not able to locate draft article at this time. --Christiangamer7 (talk)05:29, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Upped to a C-class. More citations, improve the intro paragraphs and resolve the excessive number of red links for players and this could make a B-class. A solid effort.ElfmanWriter (talk)02:07, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply] Not done Not done, someone already rated it as B-class. --Christiangamer7 (talk)05:29, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is availablehere.
