This page is for requesting modifications to URLs, such as markingdead or changing to a new domain. Some bots are designed to fixlink rot; they can be notified here. These bots includeInternetArchiveBot andWaybackMedic. This page can be monitored by bot operators from other language wikis since URL changes are universally applicable.
Whether or not I am supposed to add this here, I don't know, if I am not supposed to put it here, let me know. But to go along with whoever listed US federal government websites on this page. I also think there needs to be something done about sources citing the governors office websites in several states since the 2024 election. This probably needs IABOT or something to go in and archive all of them. Those include the office of governor websites in:
Delaware
Indiana
Missouri
New Hampshire
New Jersey (since 2025)
North Carolina
North Dakota
Possibly South Dakota (since Kristi Noem's resignation to become DHS secretary)
Virginia (since 2025)
Washington
West Virginia
More states might need to be added. The reason why I am requesting these states (and really any state if you think about it) websites be archived by IABOT is because I've been noticing a couple of dead links ongovernor.wv.gov that were created duringJim Justice's tenure that were deleted wheneverPatrick Morrisey took office. I tried to summon InternetArchiveBot (IABOT) but had problems with Oauth.
In addition, ANY state government website that deals with a particular administration, there needs to be an archive link put up if its used in a citation. That goes for office of governor, their legislative sites, and anything else that may be deleted when the next administration is elected.Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page!02:46, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
These Mexican government agencies will likely be dissolved this month, and I'm not sure what will happen to references and other materials used within.Sammi Brie (she/her · t ·c)19:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It took place on October 17 for the former and presumably a similar time for the latter. Sites are still up for now (but with the replacing agency's logo). Unclear whether they will use it or another page for their own business. I suspect the domain rpc.ift.org.mx (full of PDFs containing broadcasting technical information) will be retained intact at some other domain at some point.Sammi Brie (she/her · t ·c)06:32, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If it's a new agency at the same domain.. what does this mean we should do in terms of archiving URLs? Options are do nothing. Or treat all URLs as dead and add archive URLs. --GreenC16:06, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
With the IFT and Cofece, the sites seem to be up as an archive. Iam expecting the domainhttps://rpc.ift.org.mx/ —which contains most of our IFT citations—to move at some point, so put a pin in this thought for now. I will let you know when that happens.Sammi Brie (she/her · t ·c)18:01, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like the archived local council election results from the London Datastore site have stopped working. I have replaced the reference for the 1982 local election results in theKaren Buck article. (See second paragraph in Career section.)The archived page was atthis page and the original washere.The reference can be seen atthis old revision of the article.The correct links to these results can be foundhere. I think I had to fix another one of these broken references recently. If anyone can help fix them elsewhere, that would be appreciated. I imagine these election results are used elsewhere.TrottieTrue (talk)14:21, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is a messy problem the URLs are inconsistent between the old amazonaws and new links at data.london.gov.uk. The easiest solution is treat the URLs as dead links, and replace with archive.org URLs.574 pages. --GreenC21:23, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hansard from the Parliament of Victoria has been at a new location since c. 2022, forcing edits like[1] to remain active. This is a simple fix, but I have no proof that all such fixes would require replacingwww withhansard. Is there a good way to do this with a bot, or would bot work be limited to listing broken links toparliament.vic.gov.au that include the stringhansard? I have no idea how many articles are involved, or how to ascertain this. Thanks,Nyttend (talk)20:28, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
PS, because this is a citation to a printed resource, an acceptable (although suboptimal) action would be to remove the URL entirely.Nyttend (talk)20:31, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nyttend: Yes the bot can check every URL for 'www' -> 'hansard' and if that works change the citation to live status. If it's truly dead add an archive URL. This is boilerplate. You discovered a rule ('www' -> 'hansard'). If you find other rules that would be great. Sometimes domains have multiple rules. I program the rules into the bot and away it goes. --GreenC21:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But can you check to verify that the potentially archived document is the same file as the document that results when you change www to hansard? Or is this so unlikely to be a problem that it's safe to tweak the URLs without checking?Nyttend (talk)07:12, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If it successfully changes www to hansard it won't add an archive URL. I have soft-404 checkers that would pick up most problems. If there is actual "content drift" ie. a few words were changed between revisions of an article, I can't pick that up, but that is a rare case. I suggest you do spot checks and if you see it we can figure out what to do based on severity, worse case I can unwind the changes. --GreenC16:16, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is a bit of a weird one, and I'm unsure if this is even the right place to report this. The site appears normal and is serving up its usual content (about theKurt Vonnegut Museum and Library). However, the page quickly redirected me to a malware download disguised as a browser update. How do we handle hijacked links like this on WP? As an aside, I put the URL through VirusTotal and only one malware vendor detected it (!)wizzito |say hello!19:35, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
MrLinkinPark333 : This is a complex site. Test runs are showing a ton of redirects, for everything. Examplethis tohere. The live page is a truncated paywall, the original content and user-comments are available in archivehere. Making links live thus could have the unintended effect of less verifiable vs. treating as dead with an archive URL. However 1. the Wayback Machine does not have archives of everything, 2. I am unable to create new archives (probably some kind of block), and 3. it's possible if archives exist they could be truncated paywall versions as well. Possibly if we can establish when the paywall went up, any URL with a date prior to that could be converted to an archive URL and expected to work. The post-paywall links probably none of them are going to work no matter the solution. --GreenC17:47, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure. Paywalls have been going up increasingly due to AI scrapers stealing content, the old open web is kind of shutting down and the new web (AI-based browsers) has yet to emerge. I'm trying to find the cut off date for the paywall, the Economist fortunately puts dates in most URLs. Thus any URL from pre-firewall will be treated as dead and likely work with the archive version. --GreenC22:09, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done:MrLinkinPark333, there is too much complexity and inconsistency. If there is a sub-path you want to work on like the previous /node/ request that is probably the best approach in smaller parts. Many websites can be done as a whole, which is usually ideal, but this one I keep getting different results hard to make sense of patterns. --GreenC04:39, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, perhaps these two URL formats in the examples above would be more useful to focus on instead of the entire website:
I think these are some of the ones I was seeing problems with. The issue is thatEconomist really does not want people stealing their content. They have sophisticated blocking technology that works on WaybackMachine archives, as well we live pages. I can't detect it, so I don't know when its being blocked or not. And it's variable, you find a pattern or system, only to discover there is none, it's inconsistent. For these reasons I am hesitant to do bot work without understanding the technology they are using and how to deal with it, if it is even possible. As I mentioned above, the premier media sites are cracking down due to AI scrapers stealing content. They likely have rate limiting as well even if I signed up for an account. --GreenC20:32, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if this needs to be addressed butPaste (magazine) in July 2025 spun-off their games & other related topics to a new dedicated outlet called Endless Mode. At the time, any old Paste article that fell under the umbrella of topics covered by Endless Mode was moved to the new url. Now Paste hasjust announced that they're shuttering Endless Mode and shifting all of that toThe A.V. Club (which they purchased in March 2024). So now all the old Paste articles & Endless Mode articles have been moved to the A.V. Club url. My issue with the way they've done the redirect is that it is not clear these old articles were originally published by a different outlet before the A.V. Club acquisition. For example:
But I'm also not seeing anything in how they structured the URLs that would make it easy to find the articles that been moved from the Paste header to the A.V. Club header. Just wanted to check to see if these old Paste articles should be marked as dead so it is clear when used that Paste was the original source & not the A.V. Club.Sariel Xilo (talk)00:09, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If the content at the new site is the same as the old site - other than site branding - it's probably not worthwhile changing a live working links to an archived link. It's sort of a pro/con situation either way. --GreenC05:43, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
IABOT treats this domain as permalive but links before about 2024 to this site no longer work.688 pages
links between around 2019-2024 of format https://www.leedsunited.com/news/[team-news|academy]/[five digit number]/[title] are generally still live at https://www.leedsunited.com/en/news/[title] (e.g.[2] is alive at[3] and[4] is live at[5]) - these links should be easy to move. There are older URLs of this format that appear to be dead though (e.g.[6] does not seem to be live anywhere on leedsunited.com). Hence these should me moved where live at a different url and tagged as dead otherwise.
There are many older links of other formats that are dead and not necessarily marked as such - this includes "http://www.leedsunited.com/news/article" such as[7], "http://www.leedsunited.com/news/[date]" such as[8] and "http://www.leedsunited.com/page/LatestNewsDetail" such as[9] - a lot of these give a 522 error page rather than a 404 like the later URL format though, so im not sure if this will create a problem for running a bot over these links. It seems that every live link on leedsunited.com is at leedsunited.com/en though so it might work to mark anything that isn't and cant be moved as dead, if the 522 errors are problem.Microwave Anarchist (talk)22:11, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Toukouyori Mimoto: Thanks. The bot can only update namespace 0, 6 and 10. There are none in those namespace:[11] .. what to do in other namespaces is a general problem because it would require editing pages with esoteric formatting and user posts. If the URLs can be replaced 1:1 it might work. For examplethis tothis .. but it doesn't work. There are only93 pages total. Maybe I could try replacing with archive URLs.. --GreenC05:31, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Domain usurped and now redirects all links to a main page with the same domain name advertizing online gambling. I get338 hits through link search. Found it tagged as live link in a ref of an article so I assume it is not tagged as usurped in most others (117 articles from what I saw).Choucas0 🐦⬛⋅📬⋅📜14:24, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All links to this page are redirecting to new URLs ([12] to[13] and[14] to[15] for example). Slight complication is that some of these links are crunchy 404 -[16] redirects to[17], rather than[18], where it should redirect (similar tokicker.de) - not sure whether there's a way of sending these links to the correct place or how they should be handled if not.18,335 pages.Microwave Anarchist (talk)00:40, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Microwave Anarchist: I wrote code to convert /player_summary/ URLs because they usually have a trailing number like "/2/" which is the key, in that case it indicates for Club-Matches, then I scrape the HTML and find the URL for the Club-Matches tab. Most of the URLs are player_summery, the rest I'll simply follow the redirects or add an archive URL. --GreenC19:00, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I also wrote code for worldfootball.net/teams/.. As far as I can tell, these two types (teams and players) have crunchy-404 problems, the rest seem to redirect alright. --GreenC15:50, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying to mark the domains jurnalul.ro / www.jurnalul.ro as alive for IABot. I tried using their interfacehere but I lack the rights. Reason: The whole domain is alive. They changed the extension from htm to html which might have caused large-scale issues, but it should not be marked as permadead.Seethis change for an example of the issue.Strainu (talk)22:04, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strainu, thanks for the information. I did this back in May 2020 based on user request:Wikipedia:Link_rot/URL_change_requests/Archives/2020/May#jurnalul.ro_domain_change_error:301. It was the right thing at the time, but times have changed and the site is different now. Currently it looks anything with .html is probably working. Anything with .htm is not working, but can be made to work by converting to html. And anything without either is a dead link. I can make these changes on Enwiki (all tested and verified). In the IABot database I can update the status to live if it's a working html. If it's a non-working htm I can't do anything but leave it as permadead because IABot does not support URL moves. --GreenC01:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This was a messy job because of previous attempts to repair created problems but I think everything is correct now. I changed theglobal Permadead to "[none]" please don't change. There are some with an individual Permadead status should be OK. Any problems let me know.
Strange. I tried accessing this article[19] and I received a "Register for free to unlock this article and all our content" message. (Maybe it's just the older articles that need to be registered for).
Actually, Wayback partly works: the body of the article has a spinning circle does not load. And can't do a SPN (Save Page Now) probably cookies.txt disabled access. --GreenC22:53, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Piñanana I think the question here is whether a bot can change the tcmdb template so that instead of hitting a redirect at tcm, that it goes to the page at catalog.afi.com . A note has been added toTemplate talk:TCMDb title about something that may be similar, but I am not sure.Naraht (talk)18:30, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can tell, the TCMdb family of templates are hopelessly broken. I have tried to contact TCM a couple of times for help, but I have never received a response. –Jonesey95 (talk)01:30, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
AlsoTemplate:Screenonline nameTemplate:Screenonline titleTemplate:Screenonline TV title:
Piñanana, you have reached the right person/place to do this kind of work. Probably the easiest will be to convert the templates to normal archive URLs.
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20201014145243/https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/person/87065|10493/wp#overview Alfred Hitchcock] at the [[Turner Classic Movies|TCM Movie Database]] (archived)
Then deprecate the template once it's cleared out. There is no one-size-fits-all solution that makes keeping the template possible, each URL will have its own requirements with snapshot date and URL formatting. --GreenC22:39, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@GreenC: per a further discussion atWT:FILMhere, there is consensus to just outright remove the TCM database template and replace it (if needed) with{{AFI film}} since that's where the data is stemming from. I don't know if the archived pages are of any use to TCM if all of its data was pulled from AFI anyways. -Favre1fan93 (talk)15:38, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Favre1fan93: According to the AFI template, step 1 is "Search AFI Catalog for the film title you want". There is no way to automate. I can't manually search thousands of films for the AFI number. Also TCM is not only films also people. The best I can do is replace existing TCM templates with an archive URL, which I recommend regardless of other efforts to replace it with AFI, which may or may not ever happen (in part or whole) due the manual efforts involved. --GreenC16:46, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think the thought process would be if the AFI template already exists alongside the TCMd one, we can outright remove. Otherwise, the process you suggested would suffice. -Favre1fan93 (talk)20:54, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, there's something like 9000 articles that use the TCMd template without also using the AFI template, so it's not an easy swap. The TCMd template is also on a large amount of non-American films that, as such, do not even have an AFI Catalog entry.Οἶδα (talk)21:45, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The best I can do is replace existing TCM templates with an archive URL please don't. I will end up sending the template to TfD and those links will need to be manually searched for and deleted.Gonnym (talk)08:04, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
FYI there are12,211 pages on enwiki that use the TCM database as part of a citation and/or external link. It is a "large" domain (anything over 10,000), and considered reliable. It's unusual to delete links/references entirely vs. adding archives. Also anything my bot does can be reversed, or deleted, it's designed that way with saved logging, it does not require manual work to undo the bot edits. --GreenC08:50, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But I hope you see the contradiction. Articles might look like this:
==External links== * [https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/person/87065|10493/wp#overview Alfred Hitchcock] at the [[Turner Classic Movies|TCM Movie Database]]
Or this:
==External links== * {{TCMDb name |87065%7C10493 |Alfred Hitchcock}}
In the first case your saying it's OK to convert to an archive URL. In the second case not. They are exactly the same thing. --GreenC21:36, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd argue thatany usage as an external link used should be removed if the template is deleted at TfD. I was referring above to if the link is used manually as a citation.Gonnym (talk)10:27, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well by comparison nobody has attained consensus to eliminate IMDB, from external link sections, it is an unreliable source. Not sure how well it will go eliminating TCM, which is reliable including the archived link. You could argue it isredundant but that is a more complex case that would require replacement with AFI, which is a manual process that could take years, if ever. Thus in the interim the thinking it to at least add archive versions due to policies of link rot. --GreenC21:04, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
When the template is removed, by extension links are also removed. But it doesn't (always) have to be that way. Both these questions should be looked at: the template, and the link. Sometimes they go hand in hand, sometimes not. It is possible to remove the template and not remove the link. This is particularly true in this situation, where the source links are all dead and the template is not flexible enough to handle individual archive URLs, and so the template no longer makes sense. But the content is still reliable and of value as an archive page. --GreenC19:44, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, and as I've said multiple times, I believe this site does not offer anything of value that we can't get from other live websites. If the TfD ends in keep, then do your magic.Gonnym (talk)18:57, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But you are not offering a solution for replacing it. To add AFI would require looking it up manually 9,000 times. It would be better to keep what exists, while we have it, and only remove when a replacement is ready. --GreenC01:37, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The algorithm employed here by GreenC bot to add TCM rescue URLs needs fixing. The logic seems to choose the oldest available capture URL on Wayback Machine. That's normally a good choice when rescuing a defunct web page. But for TCM pages (and likely for other similar websites), the defunct URL was continually being improved, e.g., the oldest capture of a TCM "synopsis" page might just be an empty placeholder/skeleton. Over the years, the page got edited, corrected, filled in with useful data. Therefore, in the case of an evolving website like TCM, GreenC bot should choose thenewest valid capture, not the oldest. The newest most closely represents the intent of the WP editors who worked on the article. I say "valid capture" because the latest capture(s) might already be bad due to the website's overhaul (e.g., the latest TCM captures show a "403 Forbidden" error code). And so IMO, the algorithm for rescuing an evolving website like TCM should be to start with the newest capture URL, and work backwards in time searching for the first one that has data in it, that doesn't return an error code, etc. As things stand, the thousands of TCM URLs that GreenC bot has just rescued are pointing to useless web pages which do not support the WP article.The-dansker (talk)12:10, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just realized I should qualify my prior comment. The scope of the problem is not as bad as I suggested. In many WP articles about films, the only TCM reference in the article is the {TCMDb} "External link" that's already been discussed in the "TM:TCMDb" section. And so the problem I'm referring to only pertains to articles that have an inline citation to a TCM "Overview", "Synopsis", "Notes", "Trivia", etc., page, which will probably be a relatively small subset of all the articles that GreenC bot updated.The-dansker (talk)12:30, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect the reasonthis is not redirecting tohere is because the old is "wont" and the new is "won-t", and when they created redirects from old to new, the programmer didn't notice or didn't care. It makes my job more difficult because now I don't know what the new ID is "1.309839" - it might be possible to solve with theruled inferred mapped redirect method the hardest trick in the book. First will check how many exist. --GreenC21:26, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The URL above also changed dont to don-t. It's possible that any words with apostrophes are changed, but I haven't search. I tested the above link changing dont and wont, but no redirect was made.MrLinkinPark333 (talk)20:27, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It looked like some of these problems are resolved with ghost redirects and the rest have no resolutions available at Wayback. --GreenC18:07, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
In the fact box to the right, there is a direct link to that company's page at The Brønnøysund Register Centre (public state agency) in Norway, where all companies and organisations are registered and are given a 9 digit ID.
Burrelles was an American company that provided data for/about media that ceased operations in 2024. Its former domain has been sold and all links are now dead. It has been used as references for media circulation and other data.
This run requires two layers of added tech: Ghost redirect detection. And an "impersonation" stack to bypass their "Press & Hold" bot detector. That plus the 7k size makes it run slow, but it will be successful converting many to live links. --GreenC03:51, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The new URL for this news source is oneindia.com. Some of these links can be converted to the new URLs while others can't:
Converted links: These links need to haveyear month and day in them. The old url needs thesubdomain removed andoneindia.in changed to oneindia.com. For example,this is nowhere forSunanda Pushkar.
All other links: The remaining links do not convert.Here is an example atGangster (2014 film). No new URL was found as well. I think all non-converted links would need archives.
post.jagran.com This newspaper source is now at thedailyjagran.com. However, it looks like the old URLs don't redirect and are not at the new site. Example isthis atV. Dhananjay Kumar.
Svenska Dagbladet has recently changed the URL structure of its historical newspaper archive, causing many archive links on Wikipedia to break.
Old format (broken):
https://www.svd.se/arkiv/YYYY-MM-DD/PAGE/SVD - for example: https://www.svd.se/arkiv/1960-08-17/9/SVD
New format:
https://www.svd.se/arkiv/YYYY-MM-DD/SVNY/PAGE - for example: https://www.svd.se/arkiv/1960-08-17/SVNY/9
I request a bot run to automatically update all affected links in articles to the new format so that the archive references become functional again.Saftgurka (talk)08:24, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
[21] This particular link shows "Oops! There was a problem!" upon clicking. Since it is for a comparatively old film, having an archived version would be helpful to verify info mentioned on the film's page.BhikhariInformer (talk)15:11, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect this website may not be up much longer. TheWLNE-TVWJAR-ABC quasi-separate operation appears to have ended on January 9; there are no articles since that date,their longtime anchor left, and they just rebranded as Coastal ABC. WJAR has its own site that will probably stay up, but I'm not so certain about this one. As a news-producing TV station, I suspect there are a fair number of links to it that need to be archived just in case, if they have not been already, seemingly about 180.Sammi Brie (she/her · t ·c)19:16, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The domain wasre-registered on Dec 8 2025 to a Chinese name server. Hard to say but it looks like a usurpation of an abandoned domain that has not yet been spamified. The original was active for 20 years, and has 2,000 pages on Wiki, so it must have a high SEO rankings, a very good find for spammers. I'll treat it as a dead site and if it ever goes usurp send over to JUDI. If the original site is ever reactivated I can "makelive" again. --GreenC01:46, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The following domains have been usurped by a common actor and turned into spam sites advertising an AI chatbot software. Some of these sites appear to be forums, but upon closer inspection the "users" themselves are clearly AI chatbots, probably a "live" demonstration of the software.
All Skies Encyclopaedia has moved to a new server and domain. The old URLs still work (for now), but they should be updated: a bot should replace every instance ofhttps://xing.fmi.uni-jena.de/mediawiki/index.php/* withhttps://ase.exopla.net/index.php/*SevenSpheres (talk)19:19, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This old astronomy website has been offline for ~2 years, but there are still links to it that haven't been updated to archive links. Some of them are just external links that aren't used as references, so alternatively those could be removed.SevenSpheres (talk)19:26, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
HiMrLinkinPark333, I could use help with this site. It has many edge cases. Most of them I have fixes for, but one case is theMusic Genre Awards, which moved. For example,this (archive) is nowhere. To find this you would click the pull-down menu at the top of the "archive" link, find the list of genre award categories, hover over each to find the slug code ("259"). Then go tohttps://www.grammy.com/music-genre and find the new equivalent page. I'm not really sure how to match these up. --GreenC06:29, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the genres, I notice that some of the same awards are split intotwopages like Best Dance Recording. If you could provide a list of links, (1 per number), I could see what matches up.MrLinkinPark333 (talk)17:09, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
For the first 1,000 pages which are processed, there are 124 non-unique URLs and 43 unique URLs. Estimating total of around 434 URLs that could be saved this way. Worst case is they end up as archive URLs which appear to display OK. -GreenC17:28, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
On further glance, the pages are blank foralternative andr&b. I don't know if the website is still in progress or not. I also notice that the slugs seem to follow the same order as the main music genre page but there are some numbers out of order. Let me know if you want to archive them all, or convert/archive.MrLinkinPark333 (talk)17:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The site had a CMS change around 2017 or 2018 and never fully recovered. Whatever you find I can convert, or we can just archive them. --GreenC19:01, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think any withgrammys/awards/winners-nominees/should be archived for the time being. This is because of the blank pages for alternative and r&b. We can always revisit them later. A link rot case for these URLs could help determine what would need fixing.MrLinkinPark333 (talk)20:39, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The NIOSH Science Blog was recently reconfigured and the URLs changed in a non-uniform manner, with no redirects. I've matched the old and new URLs, which are available throughthis Wikidata query. Some posts have been removed completely, and these should instead point to Internet Archive. This affects131 pages.Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs)22:49, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
User:Antony-22, I was able to fix 100 links but some a sizable number 64 have no match found.
This is incredibly bizarre. anotheracronym.org looks like a legitimate site at first; it's the website of the political advocacy organizationAcronym. The problem comes when you click "about" on the hamburger menu - it redirects to a classicWP:JUDI example within the website itself (?!). The press coverage of this organization seems to have peaked around 2019 to 2020 and the last social media updates from them were in 2022, so I wouldn't be surprised if this organization went bust a few years ago and some judi spammer was able to find a vulnerability in the site.wizzito |say hello!14:09, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The site went into a temporary unavailable splash page in September 2023. Offline altogether in mid 2025. Then September 2025 it came back online recreating the 2023 front page with the spam content pages. Good catch.ωAwaiting nextWP:JUDI batch. --GreenC06:02, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It seems thatarmyrecognition.com is related and contains the archivednavyrecognition.com articles.
For exampleold page (on archive.org) is now found atnew. It looks like the last part of the slug stays the same (at least this is true for a couple different articles I checked), so it should be possible to update these.
However, I also see some links of the form:navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2166. It seems less obvious how those can be converted (FWIW the new version of that link ishere).BoredPenguin (talk)03:30, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Armyrecognition is not working giving "Origin Unreachable" errors. Happens in a browser also. I'll try again later. --GreenC07:08, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Enwiki
Checked 776 pages andedited 708 pages. Moved 918 links to a new URL: 918ruled mapped redirects, Resolved 6soft-404s. Removed 2{{dead link}}. Added 1{{dead link}}. Switched 27|url-status=dead to live. Switched 91|url-status=live to dead. Added 155 archive URLs (150 Wayback).
ωAwaiting next batch ofWP:JUDI for navyrecognition.com (for those unable to convert to armyrecognition).
This website seems to have deviated into being the webmaster's podcast, and I doubt the various things we link to it for (many of which are pdfs) are going to come back. Now, on the other hand they give me a clean 404, so I'm not really sure why this isn't automatically taken care of by bots already. But based onAll pages with source code containing "hellenisticastrology.com" I think we can just replace all links to it with archive links.Dingolover6969 (talk)02:18, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
As of now (5PM CDT, 2026-2-2) the only noticable change in their website is that there is a casino popup ad when you first enter the page.It's not Judi. It appears that everything else is intact (?), but better safe than sorry.
Did anyone archive them? Which sections of the WF are most important to Wikipedia pages? And more importantly, how does one add an archive link to a particular citation? I think if people Wayback Machined them it shouldn't be too much of a problem, but adding all those archive links is going to take a while.VidanaliK (talk to me) (contributions)01:43, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This page is to notify that archive links need to be added for deadlines. There are automated bots that can add archives, which should deal with most uses of Factbook. You can add archive links to any particular article usingInternetArchiveBot. Urls that are added to Wikipedia are usually automatically archived by the Wayback Machine, so hopefully most of the links will have archives available. --LCUActivelyDisinterested«@» °∆t°10:02, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
User:ActivelyDisinterested yeah I'll do it. Surprised it's only4,391 pages. IABot is not a good option for Factbook because they are redirecting to a splash page that returns 200 (vs. 404) so IABot won't detect the dead links. Also the site has serious content drift problems the timestamps really matter. The 2021 page for Venezuela is very different from the 2025 page. I'll need to work backwards favoring the newest timestamp (or access-date), instead of the oldest as usual, and that will be difficult, need to do some development work. The archived Factbook will quickly become outdated since the statistics are now static - they kept it updated was it's strength. --GreenC17:28, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Whether a new source is needed depends on the claim it is being used to support. e.g. an archive version is fine to cite for historical or unchanged facts (e.g. founding date, population as of <date>) but a new one will be needed for updated figures.Thryduulf (talk)16:52, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Only the archive URL and archive date needs to be changed (and the URL status set to "dead" if it isn't already). So far as I am currently aware, this only affects this one page and no changes need to be made to other links to this site. However, the same change also needs to be made on multiple other languages.Thryduulf (talk)13:31, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean convert query.nytimes.com links to their canonical form at www.nytimes.com by following the redirects? It's a reasonable request, because if query.nytimes.com ever stops redirecting (the sort of thing that happens frequently when sites have CMS changes) - we will no longer know where they redirect to. The NYT is clamping down on web archive providers due to AI scrapers, so the only one left that might support it is Archive.today, but the community now wants toban it, so we may be in a situation sooner than later where these links could become completely inaccessible to Wikipedia. --GreenC01:29, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This used to be the website for one of American Megatrends' products, but now it goes to a website about AI and learning (one of those very sketchy looking websites with articles that are obviously AI generated with seemingly no purpose whatsoever). An archived version is seenhere and it seems that it has been not under AMI ownership for at least 3 years (there is anarchived version of it from 2023 that is unrelated).Goldenbutternutsquash (talk)22:57, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Now a porn site. Archive is available for the following citation (though I find the validity of it dubious, is a more official copyright search possible?)