Similar toHamas history andHamas Group. Unncessary template. Created by a banned user for sockpupptery but this is really article content on template space and violatesWikipedia:TG. If you want history of Hamas, you can view the articles. A template is not meant to carry this sort of information. It states Hamas biographies on the top of the sidebar and that already implies this is not a template for navigation but for details that go on an article. This template's scope is still unclear and not really suitable for what templates are for.WikiCleanerMan (talk)23:59, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:31, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Single use template, not an appropriate use of an infobox template. Not sure what the intention was here, possible a test?Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing)23:24, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. A red link along with a link to the Latvian Wikipedia. No usage here.WikiCleanerMan (talk)18:29, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We already have an Algebra navbox. No need for this.WikiCleanerMan (talk)18:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unused and unnecessary timelines. We already have an article for this and has a complete list for this.WikiCleanerMan (talk)18:41, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion wasrelisted on2025 October 26.✗plicit23:31, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Navbox with no transclusions and links to only two distinct articles in the body. –Jonesey95 (talk)19:30, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions afterall of the linked articles were merged. –Jonesey95 (talk)19:25, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion wasdelete. Creator tagged with CSD G7.Rusalkii (talk)21:26, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary template. All it contains is the letter "w".88.97.192.42 (talk)17:51, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion wasdelete. Creator tagged with CSD G7.Rusalkii (talk)21:04, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This redirect serves no purpose.Gonnym (talk)17:44, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion wasspeedy delete.WP:G7 requested by creator.Toadspike[Talk]23:49, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary template.Template:Disambiguation automatically adds this as a short description.88.97.192.42 (talk)17:37, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not use redirects/shortcuts for this template.Gonnym (talk)17:51, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit14:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unused as the infobox usesTemplate:Infobox/mobileviewfix.css.Gonnym (talk)14:06, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit14:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unused as the infobox usesTemplate:Infobox/mobileviewfix.css instead.Gonnym (talk)14:05, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Propose redirectingTemplate:Disappeared date and age toTemplate:Death date and age.
This template functions exactly as{{death date and age}} except that the later has been moved to Lua and has error checking for invalid params and dates that are not possible (age over 130). In fact in the documentation for this template it saysNote: This template is based on, and has exactly the same syntax as {{Death date and age}}.
I checked inSpecial:ExpandTemplates and the only difference between the two is that Death date and age adds a hidden span with a machine readable date. I don't see any reason that this template cannot be simply redirected...Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing)05:44, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{Death date and age|2020|10|5|1990|6|2}}→October 5, 2020(2020-10-05) (aged 30)Also to be deleted along with{{Tennis round color}}. Replaced with template styles function in{{Tennis sm match}}..waddie96 ★ (talk)03:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit14:34, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Only 3 mainspace transclusions. Doesn't actually provide much helpful information to the reader. I don't believe there are enough articles in this 'Series' to warrant a sidebar.SnowyRiver28(talk)00:12, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]