June 1

Template:PacifiCat ferries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete Plastikspork_―Œ^(talk)22:33, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PacifiCat ferries (talk ·history ·transclusions ·logs ·subpages)

This template is an orphan and the three ferries concerned are not unique enough to warrant their own articles.Gwsk55970 (talk)21:36, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, mostly redirects.Frietjes (talk)16:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• deleteKingjeff (talk)00:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The 3 core links are all redirects. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs)09:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation --Whpq (talk)20:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tag Team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion waskeep, appears another link was added, but I will rename it to match the article to address the IPs concern. Plastikspork_―Œ^(talk)22:28, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tag Team (talk ·history ·transclusions ·logs ·subpages)

FailsWP:NENAN in my opinion, but there is debate about the relevancy of record labelsThe Banner talk19:16, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• keep, has enough core links.Frietjes (talk)16:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete orrename not aboutTag Team ; if kept, it should match the main article. --65.94.76.126 (talk)06:58, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Only 4 core links, so failsWP:NENAN. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs)09:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation (I count only 4 core links) --Whpq (talk)20:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:U.P.O.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete Plastikspork_―Œ^(talk)22:25, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:U.P.O. (talk ·history ·transclusions ·logs ·subpages)

FailsWP:NENAN in my opinion, but there is debate about the relevancy of record labelsThe Banner talk19:15, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• weak delete, there are five core links, but the artists are already well connected to the main band article.Frietjes (talk)16:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The record labels don't belong in the template, because they are not defined by their relationship withU.P.O.. The two artists are already linked to from each article on an album, so that just leaves the two albums ... and two albums is not enough to need a navbox. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs)21:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation --Whpq (talk)20:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Quad City DJ's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete Plastikspork_―Œ^(talk)22:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Quad City DJ's (talk ·history ·transclusions ·logs ·subpages)

FailsWP:NENAN in my opinion, but there is debate about the relevancy of record labelsThe Banner talk19:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• weak delete, only three core links since one of the singles is a redirect.Frietjes (talk)16:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Only 3 core links, so failsWP:NENAN. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs)09:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation --Whpq (talk)20:16, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Like

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasrelisting onWikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 June 9. Plastikspork_―Œ^(talk)00:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Digable Planets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete Plastikspork_―Œ^(talk)19:53, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Digable Planets (talk ·history ·transclusions ·logs ·subpages)

failsWP:NENANThe Banner talk12:58, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• weak delete, does not have enough relevant links.Frietjes (talk)17:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • a compilation album was added, but that article is very weak, and I still think it doesn't have enough core links.Frietjes (talk)16:02, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation. The addition of the compilation album ups the core links to 4 so still short. --Whpq (talk)20:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jocelyn Enriquez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion waskeep, more links were added. Plastikspork_―Œ^(talk)03:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jocelyn Enriquez (talk ·history ·transclusions ·logs ·subpages)

failsWP:NENANThe Banner talk11:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, has enough relevant links.Frietjes (talk)17:27, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation. There are only 4 core links aside form the link for the main article. --Whpq (talk)20:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • addedIf You Could Read My Mind.Frietjes (talk)16:42, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Arson Anthem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete Plastikspork_―Œ^(talk)19:48, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arson Anthem (talk ·history ·transclusions ·logs ·subpages)

failsWP:NENANThe Banner talk10:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• weak delete, does not have enough relevant links.Frietjes (talk)17:27, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation --Whpq (talk)20:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Scary Kids Scaring Kids

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete Plastikspork_―Œ^(talk)03:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scary Kids Scaring Kids (talk ·history ·transclusions ·logs ·subpages)

failsWP:NENAN as I consider record labels as not relevantThe Banner talk09:46, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not enough relevant links. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs)10:15, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation --Whpq (talk)20:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:INOJ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasrelisting onWikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 June 9 Plastikspork_―Œ^(talk)00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:All Shall Perish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasrelisting onWikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 June 9 Plastikspork_―Œ^(talk)00:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Robbie Nevil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion waskeep, more links were added. Plastikspork_―Œ^(talk)03:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Robbie Nevil (talk ·history ·transclusions ·logs ·subpages)

FailsWP:NENANThe Banner talk00:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not enough relevant links. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs)10:18, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, has enough relevant links.Frietjes (talk)17:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • addedDominoes, which increases it to five.Frietjes (talk)00:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation. There are only 4 core links aside from the main article. --Whpq (talk)20:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Boo-Yaa T.R.I.B.E.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete Plastikspork_―Œ^(talk)03:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Boo-Yaa T.R.I.B.E. (talk ·history ·transclusions ·logs ·subpages)

FailsWP:NENANThe Banner talk00:01, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not enough relevant links. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs)10:22, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• weak delete, does not have enough relevant links.Frietjes (talk)17:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation --Whpq (talk)20:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.