Created in 2011, not actually mentioned in the destination article, only indirectly in the mention oftelegraph implies the process of writing at a distance, which is not referenced. A Google Books search for the phrase "far writing" doesn't bring up uses of it as a phrase. This seems a bit too contrived to be useful. The search engine should do fine here.--Joy (talk)09:44, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This redirect currently links toGraph (discrete mathematics). "Network" is sometimes used to mean "graph", but can have other meanings as well. This page was previously a redirect toFlow network; before that, it was an article. Since users could be looking for various different pages, and there's not an obvious primary topic, I believe this page would best redirect toNetwork, but there are other potential options, such asNetwork theory.The BooleanTalk01:41, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the current and proposed targets. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬07:16, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Not mentioned at target (nor anywhere else on enwiki); the original creation edit summary wasCreating a temporary redirect for the Burmese musical artist. Maybedelete perWP:REDYES?Duckmather (talk)06:52, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Since we're on the subject...this isn't mentioned at the target. Not having seen the Simpsons Movie, I immediately instead thought ofOffice Space instead, which has a pretty memorable scene featuring something very much like this. But either way, again, it's not mentioned, so it's useless to those who know it but are looking for more information, and confusing to those who don't know it, so it should be deleted. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos)22:00, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Since this is the third in the series of redirects pertaining to the Simpsons Movie's nude scene, I mentioned in another RfD that this is a well-known meme template.Xeroctic (talk)22:13, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This misspelling might be unambiguous (even then, that's a bit uncertain), but definitely is not plausible. I seriously doubt anyone these days would misspell neologism as neolism. 🤨SeaHaircutSoilReplace05:59, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I really want to say retarget tobioanalysis, but that article is pretty underwhelming and could use some major expansion for such an important and large topic, and technically, bioanalysis i.e. bioanalytical chemistry is more specific than biochemical analysis, the former being more quantitative, and the latter including more qualitative aspects like protein structures and such. So I am on the fence between that and anotherWP:RETURNTORED situation, where we really need a broad concept article at this title, pulling together the disparate content, like bioanalysis andBlood_test#Biochemical_analysis. We could try for a sort of disambigation page, but I don't really like that idea at all, as I don't think we can pull together enough links in a sensible way.Mdewman6 (talk)02:15, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Disambig, you said it yourself: it is an ambiguous term with no better primary target, because it may refer to any type ofanalysis ofbiochemistry. We have at least tree items to start a valid disambig page:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: A disambiguation page has been drafted. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬05:51, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
None of these redirects need to exist at all. Wikipedia article titles do not need to be a service for resolving RGB color triples to CSS color names. –jacobolus(t)06:59, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This redirects to the street circuit in Exhibition Place that is used for racing. I don't believe that this is the appropriate target for this redirect and I think it should be a disambiguation page or redirect to a different target. Previously, many pages that mentioned the Exhibition Place street circuit linked to this redirect, but I bypassed them.Cyrobyte (talk)04:05, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I have seen some people misspell "Taiwan" as "Thaiwan," but even then, the redirect seems highly unlikely to be stumbled upon, which ultimately makes it redundant.8BitBros (talk•edits) 03:57 10 February 2026 (UTC)
Retarget per nom (as incorrect capitalization)...probably could have been done without a discussion. I'm not an entomologist, but there are apparently over 400,000 known species of beetles, and I suspect at least a few of them are blue. The current target doesn't even list this as a common name of the thing. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos)15:59, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Is the board game notable? Either way, I think it's dubious that a board game about an event would be the primary topic over the event itself. Search results tend to skew towards commercial products as they get a cut for items sold from their link, so I'm not surprised that search results would point that direction. --Tavix(talk)17:37, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, now I'm a little confused. I just used a different search engine, and it pointed me to a bunch of civil war stuff, but none of them actually use the term "war of the states", just some terms that look similar. For what it's worth, this term also doesn't appear inNames of the American Civil War.Chess enjoyer (talk)17:57, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)Delete I did some digging but only foundone source that seems to use the term to refer to the war specifically. There are some other hits on Google Books, but the actual texts seem to use the more commonWar Between the States. I don't think there's enough usage here to justify adding a mention at the current target orNames of the American Civil War. Thus, I think people using this phrase are likely looking for the board game which may or may not be notable enough for an article. A redlink seems like the best solution here. -Presidentmantalk ·contribs (Talkback)18:00, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget toNames of the American Civil War#War Between the States as suggested. "War of the States" and "War between the States" were descriptive idioms commonly usedduring the war itself for the conflict, and not so much these days. Redirecting to the naming pagespace subhead "informs the controversy" better than a redirect to the main article. This is a good discussion to create, however.BusterD (talk)18:09, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This redirect got only 67 hits all last year[1] and had only one incoming link, which I just changed to point directly toAmerican Civil War, so deleting it probably wouldn't hurt anything. On the other hand, it's been around 19 years without causing problems, so there's no urgent need to change or delete either. It's not a common term for the Civil War, but I could see rare instances of someone possibly confusing War Between the States for this term. If someone wants to write an article about the board game, they can write right over the redirect as easily as if it were a redlink.Station1 (talk)23:16, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Usage in articles does largely refer tosex verification in sports. Most of these articles cover a couple of the same cases, so this may reflect usage by one or a handful of editor working on similar articles rather than broader usage. A Google search turns up many results related toprenatal sex discernment. This could possibly refer to other entries atSex determination#Discernment of an organism's sex. Of course, "gender" is conflated with "sex" if we keep, retarget, or DABify using any of these. Good redirects sometimes anticipate such things, but pointing readers to any of these without addressing thesex–gender distinction is inappropriate. So I'm unsure what the best course of action is. I find the nom's suggestion of a quiz ongender schema theory, or simplygender theory, quite unlikely. These articles don't coverexams on the theories, anyway. —Myceteae🍄🟫 (talk)02:40, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
PerWP:SSRT, the main purpose of having a soft Wikt redirect is either for commonly used terms without articles or to discourage the creation of articles for topics that don't need a Wikipedia article but are repeatedly given one. Neither applies here; this page has a single mainspace incoming link and has apparently never existed as an article. If anything, its history shows that it's become a target for vandalism by unregistered users. Delete.— An anonymous username,not my real name03:54, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We normally keep{{R from move}} redirects, for good reason, but this article was only at this title for its first circa 10 hours and that was in 2018, so most of the usual reasons are not relevant here.Thryduulf (talk)03:59, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I've looked at the articles for every settlement listed atByron (disambiguation), the current target has far more information about local politics than any of the other articles, but as noted this does not include a list.Byron, Illinois andByron, Minnesota mention the settlement has a mayor but neither contains a list of them, meaning there is no such list anywhere on Wikipedia.Thryduulf (talk)03:56, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Closed discussion, seefull discussion. Result was:delete