January 1

Wikipedia:STABLE

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete. --BDD (talk)18:12, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:STABLEWikipedia:STABLE →Wikipedia:Manual of Style(links to redirect •history •stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Outdated, not usedRezonansowy(talk •contribs)16:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I was thinking ofretargetting it toWikipedia:Stable versions even though that page is already historical. However, if that's not possible then I'm ok withDelete.--Lenticel^(talk)02:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • You read my mind.--Rezonansowy(talk •contribs)10:54, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  I have notifieduser:Lmatt and left a note atWikipedia talk:Manual of Style#WP:STABLE.John Vandenberg^(chat)05:31, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Walter Matuschanskayasky

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion waskeep, but remove section anchor. (NAC)Armbrust^{TheHomunculus}08:42, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Walter MatuschanskayaskyWalter Matuschanskayasky →Walter Matthau(links to redirect •history •stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Delete - extremely unlikely search term which redirects to a section of the subject's article that no longer exists.Jerry Pepsi (talk)03:43, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep according to the article on Walter Mattau, he was credited by this name in at least one film. The redirecy should however of course not go to a section which doesn't exist. Let it go to the article without any section anchor.Arms Jones (talk)05:17, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - plausible search term, given it appears in movie credits. Removing the anchor to a non-existent section is sensible enough.WilyD10:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. I have tagged the article with{{cn}} for that mention.John Vandenberg^(chat)05:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.