May 25

Colorado Review

*Colorado Review →Colorado reviewI have swapped around redirects withColorado review (the target) in order to preserve contribution history per GFDL. However, I believe that perWP:NAME#Lowercase, the source is the correct capitalization and am therefore requesting that the source (Colorado Review) be deleted, the target moved to the source name and then redirected. Or an admin history merge.MLauba (talk)15:23, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For clarity's sake, note thatColorado Review appears to have been nothing but a straight copy / paste ofColorado review on May 19th, 2009, followed by non-content tasks, so there is no edit history worth keeping under that one, contrary to the other article which goes back to 2007. Also, if there had been a smarter way to handle this all (I'm sure there must be one), please let me know for the future, thanks.MLauba (talk)15:30, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn, I finally read up on history merges.MLauba (talk)09:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Examples of the Diverse Applications of the term Placebo

• Examples of the Diverse Applications of the term Placebo →Placebo

Not a likely term for searching or linking, and miscapitalized in any case. There aren't any particular "Examples of the Diverse Applications of the term" at the target.—Gavia immer (talk)05:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete implausible search term.Maralia (talk)19:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per Maralia and Gavia immer.Eubulides (talk)06:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above: not a plausible search term, no significantincoming links, and no significant unique page history worth preserving (the pagemove history ispreserved in the page history ofUses of the term placebo, which is a redirect (from a merge) toPlacebo). –BLACK FALCON^(TALK)01:23, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Highly unlikely search term. -FASTILY^(TALK)04:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

World Jewry

• World JewryWorld Jewry →Jewish population

Implausible redirect, likely to have ironic racist connotations.Ryan Delaney^talk00:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since a google search for "World Jewry" was turning up our Wikipedia page on "Jewish population", which is absolutely intolerable, I deleted it. --Ryan Delaney^talk15:27, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delusions of grandeur

• Delusions of grandeur →megalomania

A delusion of grandeur is a form of psychosis and often a symptom of schizophrenia (seehttp://www.schizophrenia.com/diag.php). Megalomania is more of a personality trait and is not considered psychosis (Seehttp://www.buzzle.com/editorials/8-7-2005-74387.asp).Roastporkbun (talk)02:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. CurrentlyMegalomania has extensive coverage of delusions of grandeur, and attempts to distinguish between the two. As such, it is a reasonable target forDelusions of grandeur. It would be better to have two separate articles, perhaps, one on megalomania and one on delusions of grandeur; but in the meantime a redirect is better than nothing.Eubulides (talk)06:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But I think delusions of grandeur is only being tacked tomegalomania for lazy reasons. That long section on delusions of grandeur really does not belong there and needs to be moved to its owndelusions of grandeur page.Roastporkbun (talk)09:57, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm redirecting the page to a new page ongrandiose delusions.

• Turn into disambiguation page, listing both of the above articles andDelusions of Grandeur (a music album). If that isn't done, the album should be linked by hatnote instead.Robofish (talk)04:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Erotolepsy

• Erotolepsy →Erotomania

Delete. The two terms describe different phenomena.Roastporkbun (talk)02:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.Robofish (talk)04:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blonde nazi bitch

• Blonde nazi bitch →Catherine Willows

I'm not a fan ofCSI, but I gather this is an unlikely search term"blonde+nazi+bitch"+"CSI"+-wikipedia. I'd personally delete this under CSD G3, but this is a fictional character, so discussion won't hurt.Fvasconcellos (t·c)01:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete she's a redhead also, and there are other people/characters of this description70.29.208.129 (talk)06:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]