March 16

Cabral "Cabbie" Richards Staal →Cabbie Richards

Delete perWP:BLP, hoax, vandalism.New editor is introducing an unsourced name change which has already propagated to Google. The basis is possiblythis blog where the BLP subject "considers himself" a Staal brother. I have done diligent research and find no proof of family relation, am discussing with new editor. Possible speedy as BLPSE.Franamax (talk)07:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• It's fine if you ask me.—Precedingunsigned comment added byLaurentian15 (talk •contribs) 16:35, March 16, 2009 (UTC)

• Delete - Though the first three words are correct (Cabral "Cabbie" Richards) , the "Staal" one is not true.Versus22_talk07:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a BLP violation.Tavix(talk)01:52, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note the creator of the redirect is nowindef blocked for vandalism. This item should qualify as a CSD:G3.Franamax (talk)21:17, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Consensus, not truth →Wikipedia:Verifiability

Delete. As already remarked on thetalk page by another user, this is an attempt to make a bad misinterpretation ofWikipedia:Verifiability appear as official policy. A textbook case ofdisrupting Wikipedia to make a point, namely the point which the redirect's creator, apparently a vociferous Wikpedia critic, has expressedhere as "Wikipedia does not respect truth or facts or sourced material."See alsoWikipedia_talk:Verifiability/Archive_32#WP:Consensus.2C_not_truth, andother edits by the same user, especially on topics likeJimmy Wales,Citizendium andLarry Sanger.HaeB (talk)00:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - seems to be a misinterpretation/negative characterisation of Wikipedia policy; very few incoming links, and no history worth preserving.Robofish (talk)01:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per HaeB and Robofish. Redirect has no basis in fact or actual policy (past or present). Was created to make apoint. Delete with extreme prejudice. —Ched ~^(yes?)/_©02:10, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - with extreme prejudice.WP:POINT.— neuro^(talk)02:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this as just really obnoxiousWP:POINTage. The editor in question is using this to hammer on the same assertions over and over again; nobody else is using it for anything.—Gavia immer (talk)05:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of the abovechandler·04:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per aboveLetsdrinkTea22:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]