 | This page has anadministrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with{{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
| Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
|---|---|---|
Before requesting, read theprotection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism tohigh-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see therough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stoppagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see therough guide to extended confirmed protection). After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed onSpecial:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to removeobvious vandalism.
Requestaddition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level Requestremoval of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level Request aspecific edit be made to a protected page Please add an edit request to thetalk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here | ||
Temporary Semi-Protection:Persistent vandalism and spam by many IPs.Fragrant Peony (talk)17:39, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Page Move protection: Due to a relatively high number of recent back-and-forth page moves without consensus.Packerfan386beer here21:02, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection: Anonymous users continously adding contentious text in the lead section without consensus.Turaids (talk)21:12, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition ofunsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of the same unsourced content over and over again by IPs and temp accounts.Electricmemory (talk)21:26, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistentvandalism – Repeated nonsense added to this project page (and also thetalk page) immediately after protection expires - this the second time this has happened.Iiii I I I (talk)22:38, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection: Persistentvandalism.Sugar Tax (talk)01:13, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistentvandalism – Constant vandalism.MakaylaHippo1998 (talk)01:16, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection: Persistentvandalism – Socking.MakaylaHippo1998 (talk)01:19, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection: Persistentvandalism – Socking.MakaylaHippo1998 (talk)01:19, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection: Persistentvandalism – Socking.MakaylaHippo1998 (talk)01:20, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by anonymous user(s)Call me PI. (talk)01:50, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection: Persistentsockpuppetry – Month-long period of disruption by the same person abusing multiple accounts.interstatefive 02:37, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistentdisruptive editing – Persistent disruption from a block-evading IP hopper.MaterialsPsych (talk)03:00, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content.Waxworker (talk)05:57, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistentdisruptive editing. Page history proves that multiple Legacy IPs and Temporary Accounts caused disruptive edits in a span or a few months not too far from each other.Hacked (Talk|Contribs)07:47, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection: Persistentsockpuppetry – Continued socking. SeeWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/3 Löwi.Mellk (talk)10:45, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection: Persistentsockpuppetry – Continued socking. SeeWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/3 Löwi.Mellk (talk)10:45, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistentvandalism.Sugar Tax (talk)11:45, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary extended confirmed protection:BLP policy violations – Original research is continuously being added to this article concerning the age gap between the article subject and their spouse. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 14:15, 26 November 2025 (UTC).PerpetuityGrat (talk)14:15, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity tojustify protection. I suppose you meant the article and not the talk-page, though. Talk hasn't been edited for weeks, and the disruption on the article isn't heavy enough to warrant protection. You already warned the perpetraator, too. At need report toWP:AIV.Lectonar (talk)14:20, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]Semi-protection: Persistentsockpuppetry – LTA target. –Skywatcher68 (talk)14:41, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistentvandalism – Persistent IP vandalism over several days. Last request the ranges were blocked without PP and the vandals are back with new IPs.Lenny Marks (talk)14:41, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Favonian (talk)16:36, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]Temporary semi-protection: Persistentdisruptive editing – Persistent disruption by what appears to be one editor, with static and mobile IPs over November, edit warring over insistence that Turkish sources and the Turkish Wikipedia have information that TCE is not harmful, despite worldwide regulatory warnings that it is. There is no talk page consensus and no good sources to support the user's position.Zefr (talk)16:11, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistentdisruptive editing – Frequent vandalism and edit warring.Entranced98 (talk)16:45, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistentsockpuppetry – Five throwaway sockpuppet accounts and now a temporary account restoring the same edit by LTAUser:Oatsandcream.Belbury (talk)16:46, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: Talk page have had a high amount of reverts and revdels in the past two monthsTrade (talk)16:51, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: (first time doing this) Vandalism from IP users1timeuse75 (talk)17:19, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Before posting arequest for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.
To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the"View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words"protected","changed protection level", or"configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.
DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...
You may request a protection reduction below if...
If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the requestarchives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.
Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page isalso protected, preventing you from adding a request there.
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}) to the article's talk page if you would like to request an edit be made. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.{{Edit COI}} template should be used instead of the others listed above.Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found atWikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.