This page in a nutshell: If you post a legal threat on Wikipedia, you are likely to beblocked indefinitely. A polite report of a legal problem, such as defamation or copyright infringement, is not a threat and will be acted on quickly.
Do not postlegal threats on Wikipedia. A legal threat, in this context, is a threat to engage in anoff-wiki ("real life") legal or other governmental process that would target other editors or Wikipedia itself. It does not refer to any dispute-resolution process within Wikipedia. Legal threats should be reported toWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or elsewhere to anadministrator. Users who post legal threats are typicallyblocked while the threats are outstanding.
The existence of a legal dispute between users, whether as a result of incidents on Wikipedia or elsewhere, is not a valid reason to block, as long as no legal threats are made on Wikipedia. Editors involved in a legal dispute should not edit articles about parties to the dispute, given thepotential conflict of interest.
What is not a legal threat
Copyright
Complaints of copyright infringement are not legal threats. If you are the owner of copyrighted material that has been added to Wikipedia, a statement about whether it is licensed for such use is welcome. You may contact theinformation team or the Wikimedia Foundation'sdesignated agent, or use the procedures atWikipedia:Copyright problems.
A discussion as to whether material islibelous is not a legal threat.The policy on defamation is to delete libel as soon as it is identified. If you believe that you are the subject of a libelous statement, email info-en-qwikipedia.org.
Making paid editors aware of the requirements of the Wikimedia Foundation'sterms of use, or laws against undisclosed advertising, is not a legal threat.
Perceived legal threats
Always choose your words carefully when starting or responding to any discussions or disputes, as well as with any messages or communication with other users; you must refrain from making any comments that other editors may translate or interpret (even incorrectly) as legal threats. For example, if you assert that another editor's comments are "defamatory" or "libelous", that editor might interpret your communication as implying such a threat. Use less charged wording, such as "that statement about me is not true, and I ask that it be corrected."
Rationale
Posting legal threats isuncivil behavior that causes a number of problems:
It creates bad feelings and lack of trust, making it difficult toassume good faith.
Using thedispute resolution process will often lead to a positive solution without resorting to making legal threats or engaging in other unacceptable behavior.
Conclusion of legal threat
The Wikipedia community has a long-standing principle that people can change: statements made in anger or misjudgment should not be held against once withdrawn.
A user threatening a legal action on their talk page is limited in disruption. They should not be prevented from using their talk page until attempts have been made to open a civil discussion. Persistent or vexatious complaints may still lead to a ban.