| Main | Criteria | Instructions | Nominations | FAQ | Discussion | Reassessment | Report |
| Reviewing initiatives: | February backlog drive | Mentorship | Review circles | Pledges |
Good article mentors provide assistance and feedback to editors who are new to reviewing. If you are interested in reviewing but are not sure where to start, requesting a mentor can make the process easier. To request a mentor, press the button below and follow the instructions.
Archives |
This page has archives. Topics inactive for7 days are automatically archived1 or more at a time byLowercase sigmabot III. |
Mentors can:
Mentors are not expected to complete any part of the review. Mentorship is optional, and you do not have to request a mentor to begin reviewing.
Mentors () |
|---|
This is a list of users who have volunteered to be good article mentors. If you wish to choose a specific mentor, you can leave a message on one of their talk pages. Remember that not all of them might be active or be able to help at any given time. If you're an experienced reviewer, you canadd your name! You do not need to be on this list to answer a request for mentorship. Mentors are encouraged to add the mentorship page to their watchlist.
|
I saw a section in one of the good article nomination pages (instructions,what they aren't, etc.) that said if it is your first review you should get a mentor to check your work. I want to make sure I did not make any mistakes on my recent review atTalk:Duetos (Armando Manzanero album)/GA1. If someone could check it for me that would be amazing, thank you!
𝓕𝓵𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓷 (Talk to me! ·My contribs)18:20, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
