- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:convertFile:Wmor dt2.png andFile:KDMI Logo.png to{{PD-logo}};no consensus for the remaining logos. —ξxplicit01:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wkcf dt2.png (delete |talk |history |links |logs) – uploaded byStrafidlo (notify |contribs |uploads |upload log).
- File:Wrgb dt2.png (delete |talk |history |links |logs) – uploaded byStrafidlo (notify |contribs |uploads |upload log)
- File:Wmor dt2.png (delete |talk |history |links |logs) – uploaded byStrafidlo (notify |contribs |uploads |upload log)
- File:ThisTV Phoenix.png (delete |talk |history |links |logs) – uploaded byFairlyoddparents1234 (notify |contribs |uploads |upload log)
- File:KDMI Logo.png (delete |talk |history |links |logs) – uploaded byMrschimpf (notify |contribs |uploads |upload log)
- File:WZMQ19.png (delete |talk |history |links |logs) – uploaded byWcquidditch (notify |contribs |uploads |upload log)
I am wondering if the above non-free versions ofThis TV logos can be changed from non-free to{{PD-logo}} based uponFile:This TV logo.svg which is already onWikimedia Commons as well asFile:Thiscincy.jpg,File:Krnv dt2.png, andFile:Wlov dt2.png which have been tagged with{{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}}. If these are considered to betoo simple to be eligible for copyright protection, they could be tagged with{{Trademark}} and for a move to Commons. In addition, there are 5 more files similar to "File:Wkcf dt2.png2", 19 more similar to "File:Wrgb dt2.png", 11 more similar to "File:ThisTV Phoenix.png" which also may be candidates for "PD-logo" since they are essentially the same design with only the affiliate name being different. I can list all of the other files here as well if necessary, but they can be found viaList of This TV affiliates. --Marchjuly (talk)00:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Some logos, such asFile:ThisTV Phoenix.png, have light effects. I'm not sure if the light effects are sufficiently original to be copyrighted.
- A number of logos do not have working sources. For example, I added{{dead link}} toFile:KDMI Logo.png. If the logos are correct, then most logos in the set can be retagged as PD-textlogo. I managed to find a source forFile:Wkcf dt2.png and uploaded it to Commons. --Stefan2 (talk)15:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Delete; deleted byExplicit (talk ·contribs ·blocks ·protections ·deletions ·page moves ·rights ·RfA)AnomieBOT⚡03:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:TaylorSwiftCharlotteNC 8JUN2015.jpg (delete |talk |history |links |logs) – uploaded byEricCable (notify |contribs |uploads |upload log).
- Keep. It's a public-domain file, no reason to delete it just because it's not in use on English Wikipedia at this precise moment. Suggest moving it to Commons.Softlavender (talk)23:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, it's not in the public domain, and the uploader and copyright holder's wishes should be considered if there is no particular reason to keep it. There is no shortage of free images of Swift or even of this specific tour, so there's no reason to keep this specific image.Huon (talk)23:46, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not in the public domain, but under a free license (Attribution,c:Template:Attribution) that is acceptable for Wikimedia Commons.– Finnusertop (talk ⋅contribs)23:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, legally there's nothing preventing us from keeping it or spreading it even further by adding it to the Commons. However, I cannot imagine circumstances where adding this specific image to an article would be required to improve the encyclopedia, and consequently see no reason not to honor the photographer's wish to have the image deleted.Huon (talk)01:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- ThanksHuon. I appreciate it. Eric Cable | Talk 12:40, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- ThanksUser:Fastily. Eric Cable | Talk 12:40, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This is an orphaned file, and uploading the file doesn't relieve the copyright holder of that copyright unless they tag the file with{{PD-self}}, whichEricCable did not do. As there are alreadynumerous images of Taylor Swift during the 1989 World Tour on Commons, adding this particular image to Commons will not significantly add value to the project. — Jkudlick • t • c • s13:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- ThanksJkudlick. Eric Cable ! Talk 04:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
.png){kind=link}
