The following is an archived discussion of afeatured list nomination.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or inWikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list waspromoted byUser:Scorpion0422 16:30, 18 November 2008[1].

I am nominating this article because I believe it satisfies theFL criteria: it's comprehensive (only 29 players have represented Ireland and the stats are up to date) and the lead explains the article (a bit about what ODI cricket is and the background of Irleand and ODI). All comments and suggestions are welcome.Nev1 (talk)00:37, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would reconmend creating articles for the red links. If this is done then I will support. 02blythed (for some reason I cannot sign.

Not a problem, as these people have played international cricket they satisfy notability crieria. I'll get on it right away.Nev1 (talk)13:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now done, everyone on the list has their own article.Nev1 (talk)14:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I therefore believe it fulfills all theFL criteria andSupport this nomination. 02blythed ( I still cannot sign properly.

Comments - sources look okay, links checked out with thelink checker tool.Ealdgyth -Talk17:59, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "This is a list of Irish One-Day International (ODI) cricketers." – remove bold because of link perWP:BOLDTITLE
• reword the "this is a list of" to make it more interesting; checkList of mergers and acquisitions by Adobe Systems,List of Oklahoma City Thunder head coaches, andList of ISS spacewalks for ideas
• "Twenty-nine" – "29" perWP:MOS; needs to be moved somewhere else since sentences can't begin with numbers
• "and one tie" – "and 1 tie" – perWP:MOS because when comparing numbers they need to all either be numbers or letters to be consistent (within the same sentence)
• I don't think there's any need for the text to be small in the table. Just make it normal size.
• Perhaps italicize and indent "Statistics are correct as of 3 November 2008."

Gary King (talk)20:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes implemented. The text was smaller to make the table look a bit neater, but you're right it doesn't need to be small.Nev1 (talk)20:19, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by SatyrTN

• The first instance of "cap" in the lede should be wikilinked
• I'd like to see the table sortable. Since the "rowspan" headers don't work for a sortable table, I recommend adding "Batting", "Bowling", and "Fielding" to the Key. You will need to make use of the{{sort}} template for the100/50 andBB columns.
• BTW, the "100/50" column header isn't bold like the rest
• Wikilinking the header columns (Runs, Avg, Overs, Runs, Avg) is a bit strange, IMO. I would add them to the Key and wikilink there. The two "Runs" and "Avg" columns should probably be differentiated, as well.
• IConditionally Support this candidate after some of the fixes above are taken care of. --SatyrTN(talk /contribs)21:50, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly done. The sorting issue is a tricky one to solve, and one that's cropped up on other lists. I've completely removed the top line of the table and now it sorts fine. I don't think the top line was necessary, but if anyone disagrees, it can be reinstated.Nev1 (talk)14:07, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can I recommenddoing the Key like this? As for sorting, are the "100/50" and "BB" columns sorting correctly? I don't understand what those mean, so they may be fine - I'm just checking :) Also, the "HS" field isn't sortable and probably should be? Finally, you'll want to make use of{{sortname}} to sort the Name column by last, first. --SatyrTN(talk /contribs)16:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New key implemented. 100/50 and BB sort fine (although it's a shame about the dashes in BB). HS doesn't sort properly, the only way to do it would be to convert every highest score to three digits (ie: 3 would become 003 and 17 would become 017). I've played around with {{sortname}}, but I just can't get it to work, are you sure it can be used in tables, I've only ever seen it sorting categories.Nev1 (talk)17:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added{{sortname}} to the name column and added the sorting capability for the HS column. The HS column sorting automatically interprets numbers (so you don't need to worry about 325 coming before 37).

As an aside, the key still has "an innings that ended not out", which is grammatically incorrect. --SatyrTN(talk /contribs)01:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for fixing that (and somehow you got HS to sort properly!)

In cricket, innings is both plural and singular, so to say "an innings" is fine (eg: "he had a good innings").Nev1 (talk)01:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.