The following is an archived discussion of afeatured list nomination.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or inWikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list waspromoted 23:26, 6 April 2008.

This is based on the same basic format asPFA Players' Player of the Year, which looks to be on course for FL. I've incorporated any issues raised at that FLC into this article before listing it.....ChrisTheDude (talk)09:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments fromThe Rambling Man (talk ·contribs)

• Order of images is odd, why not same order as the table? (Same could apply to the other FLC as well, I can't recall....)
• "On one occasions ..." whoops.

Otherwise, looking good.The Rambling Man (talk)10:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted both pointsChrisTheDude (talk)10:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Support it is then!The Rambling Man (talk)10:23, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Good work.Mattythewhite (talk)15:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

• Is it English football, or English and Welsh football?
• From that, is the FWA solely England based, or are some in Wales too?

--ṃ•α•Ł•ṭ•ʰ•Ə•Щ•@ 16:50, 28 March, 2008

• • The FWA website says they have members throughout England, no mention is made of Wales. And the award is presented to a player in the English leagues, so "English football" is appropriate. I realise that technically speaking there are three Welsh teams in the English league, but to say "the best player in English and Welsh football" would imply that it could be won by a player in the League of Wales, which is not the caseChrisTheDude (talk)20:39, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well then there's nothing left to do butSupport --ṃ•α•Ł•ṭ•ʰ•Ə•Щ•@ 00:36, 30 March, 2008
• Comment
  • In lead, The latest winner needs an As of date.
  • Pleased to see you get the apostrophe in Fans' PotY right, even if the PFA don't!
  • In the Winners by... tables, if you narrowed the Number of wins column and increased the overall width of the tables, they'd look less lumpy. (C&P'd from comments at YPY FLC, too many acronyms round here IMHO) cheers,Struway2 (talk)20:49, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • ALl points addressedChrisTheDude (talk)20:39, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Support A well referenced and an informative list, which is fully deserving of FL statusNapHit (talk)19:06, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.