This page in a nutshell: Not all farts are notable.
Gossip magazines such asConfidential offer breathless reports about a range of celebrity body functions.
Some Wikipedia editors[A] often have a desire to put thelatest, breakingwind news in articles. However, just because a piece of trivial information was printed in a newspaper or gossip magazine, or on a website, doesn't mean there is arequirement for it to be included on Wikipedia. Keep in mind:not every fart or burp is notable.
Magazines such asPeople andUs Weekly print information that interests readers that week regardingcelebrities' purported dating activities, family disputes, and weight gain or loss. It's verifiable. That does not mean that Wikipedia needs to reproduce all of it. While there may bemany articles in the space of a few days on a topic,[1][2][3] that does not mean it is of lasting significance.
Q: If aK-pop artist's management agency announces via a portal (secretly owned by the holding company that also owns the artist's record company) that a teaser for a video accompanying the download-only version of a possible new single for the first fullcomeback may be released in the near future, should it be included in said K-pop artist's article?
Q: If the spouse of a United States presidential candidate (who happens to be a former president) poses with three fully clothedpornographic actresses, should it be included in either of their biographies?[5]
