This is anarchive of past discussions onWikipedia:Closure requests.Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on thecurrent main page.

Done -(Initiated 2404 days ago on 20 July 2019)
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please assess the consensus atWikipedia talk:Administrators#Resysop criteria: RfC on principles? Thank you.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk)10:09, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

• {{Done}} byPrimefac (talk ·contribs)yesterdayStevenCrossin^{Help resolve disputes!}13:35, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2360 days ago on 2 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atthe RfC atTalk:Midland–Odessa shooting#Naming the victims? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}}Cinderella157 (talk)11:30, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2487 days ago on 28 April 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Calvin Cheng#RFC: COI edit request re: AMIP lawsuit? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}}.Mgasparin (talk)20:37, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2378 days ago on 15 August 2019)
already relisted 3 times, no new discussion since the last relist.Frietjes (talk)13:29, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Mgasparin (talk)20:50, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2399 days ago on 24 July 2019)
Would an experienced administrator please close this discussion? MostWP:RFD regulars, including administrators, have already participated in this discussion, leaving few options for potential closers. (I just relisted this one yesterday, but I did not realize how old this discussion was until today [which is a bit of a silly oversight on my part, considering I've relisted this discussion multiple times.] Of course, perWP:RELIST, since the initial 7-day period has long-passed, if consensus can be assessed, the discussion can be closed at any time.)Steel1943 (talk)14:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

• I went intending to close the discussion, but decided that I could better serve it through participating in it. Cheers!bd2412T23:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Fish+Karate11:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2417 days ago on 7 July 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#RfC: Add 'create an article' option in the interface? Thanks,Cunard (talk)01:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}--GRuban (talk)14:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2357 days ago on 5 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Noah Kraft#RfC about use of YouTube video as primary source for lead? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}}Cinderella157 (talk)09:06, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2412 days ago on 11 July 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:NYC Pride March#RfC: On São Paulo content? Thanks,Cunard (talk)01:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} --GRuban (talk)15:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2349 days ago on 13 September 2019)

No comments for more than a week.Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk)10:18, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Mgasparin (talk)20:14, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2833 days ago on 17 May 2018)
Would an uninvolved editor please reviewthis merge proposal discussion? There is an analogous discussion in the immediately preceding section related to theCuneate fasciculus. These anatomy discussions involve proposals to mergeCuneate fasciculus andGracile fasciculus intoDorsal column–medial lemniscus pathway, with a counter-proposal to merge the fasciculi into their respective nuclei.Klbrain (talk)08:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Mgasparin (talk)07:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2795 days ago on 23 June 2018)

This discussion was archived without closure a while ago. Please let me know if it is too late for closure on this. Thanks!Dathus •TalkContribs22:23, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}}. Honestly, though, if therewere a consensus to change that no one implemented for a year and a half, that could have been a problem, since just inaction would have been an argument that change wasn't that necessary. --GRuban (talk)12:14, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2327 days ago on 4 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTemplate talk:Infobox military unit? Thanks,Ckfasdf (talk)02:33, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

@Ckfasdf: After just ten days, with discussion still ongoing?{{Not done}} --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)22:17, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2360 days ago on 1 September 2019)
This AfD has been closed three times (once by me), with each close being voided for various reasons. The discussion is now coming up on six weeks. Somebody needs to put it out of its misery. --RoySmith(talk)14:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Fish+Karate10:34, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2402 days ago on 22 July 2019)
Could an experienced editor close the currently oldest open XfD discussion. Thanks! --Trialpears (talk)11:36, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Fish+Karate13:52, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2404 days ago on 19 July 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Next United Kingdom general election#RfC about the infobox? Thanks,Cunard (talk)01:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

{{Already done}} Was closed byS_Marshall on 13 October.Fish+Karate08:43, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2402 days ago on 21 July 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Visual arts#Naming conventions for public statues? Thanks,Cunard (talk)01:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Fish+Karate08:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2400 days ago on 23 July 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Alt-right#RfC about the opening sentence? Thanks,Cunard (talk)01:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} --GRuban (talk)00:44, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2388 days ago on 4 August 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atthe RfC atWikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 161#OpenStreetMap? Thanks,Cunard (talk)01:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Doing.∯WBG^converse03:50, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} by WBG --DannyS712 (talk)02:44, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2358 days ago on 4 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#RfC about station layouts and exits? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}} byMgasparin. —JFG^talk01:15, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2400 days ago on 23 July 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Abby Martin#RfC: 9/11 Truther? Thanks,Cunard (talk)01:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} by S Marshall.Politrukki (talk)13:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2359 days ago on 3 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:TERF#RfC: How should we attribute "transphobic"?? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} byJohnuniq.ToThAc (talk)21:55, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2390 days ago on 3 August 2019)
Could an experienced and uninvolved editor please review this discussion. Thank you.Pyxis Solitary(yak)14:37, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

@Pyxis Solitary:{{done}}.ToThAc (talk)19:55, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2434 days ago on 20 June 2019)
Would an experienced editor close this very old CfD? --Trialpears (talk)06:02, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} --DannyS712 (talk)06:16, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2400 days ago on 24 July 2019)
Would an experience editor please close this discussion? --Trialpears (talk)11:27, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} byMER-C.ToThAc (talk)16:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2352 days ago on 9 September 2019)
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please assess the consensus atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: "The Western Journal" (September)? Thank you. — Newslinger talk00:56, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}.Politrukki (talk)14:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2362 days ago on 31 August 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Century#RFC: Are August 2019 edits in accord with March 2019 RFC above?? I closed the March 2019 RfC and will leave this RfC to another closer. Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

{{Already done}} by S Marshall. --qedk (t桜c)21:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2405 days ago on 19 July 2019)
Would an uninvolved editor please asses the consensus at thisRFC: Purposes of Portals (19 July 2019) RfC on the purposes of portals?  Robert McClenon (talk)05:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Fish+Karate10:27, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2350 days ago on 11 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#RfC on distributor of post-merger Fox films? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Doing... Will close this up by tomorrow. --qedk (t桜c)21:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}} --qedk (t桜c)15:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2380 days ago on 12 August 2019)
Seeking an experienced and uninvolved editor to assess the consensus atTalk:2019 Hong Kong protests#Rfc on including Junius Ho in the infobox of this article which use Template:Infobox civil conflict.Matthew hk (talk)09:30, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Please reviewthis discussion. --Jax 0677 (talk)14:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Doing... Will close this by tomorrow. --qedk (t桜c)21:07, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}} --qedk (t桜c)17:35, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2362 days ago on 30 August 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Opinion polling for the next Italian general election#RfC on "Government/Other" columns? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

No new input since 20 September 2019, the bot removed the RfC tag at 19:01, 29 September 2019‎ (UTC). Needs consensus assessment and subsequent closure by an uninvolved editor.Impru20^talk15:30, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Fish+Karate14:39, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2349 days ago on 13 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Transgender#RfC: How to word the WP:LEAD]? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} byS Marshall.Barkeep49 (talk)18:38, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2345 days ago on 17 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Democrat Party#RfC: Should this disambiguation page include an entry to Democratic Party (United States)?? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Barkeep49 (talk)18:37, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2763 days ago on 26 July 2018)
Could an uninvolved editor please review this merger proposal ofCultural Catholic andCafeteria Catholicism.Klbrain (talk)17:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Fish+Karate14:35, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2351 days ago on 11 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Right-wing populism#RfC: Inclusion of Bannon material? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} byS Marshall --DannyS712 (talk)08:11, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 3172 days ago on 12 June 2017)
This is my earnest request to an uninvolved editor to review this discussion! --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)10:14, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

@Soumya-8974:{{done}}.ToThAc (talk)22:19, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2321 days ago on 10 October 2019)
Could an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus in this discussion? Thanks! --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs)14:14, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} by Northamerica1000 --DannyS712 (talk)07:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2321 days ago on 10 October 2019)
Could an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus in this discussion? Thanks! --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs)14:15, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} byKilliondude.ToThAc (talk)14:52, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2319 days ago on 13 October 2019)
Could an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus in this discussion? Thanks! --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs)02:14, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

• {{done}}bd2412T15:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2348 days ago on 14 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Serbia#RfC regarding infobox]? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} –comradewaddie96 ★ (talk)17:42, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2343 days ago on 18 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensushere please.Selfstudier (talk)17:47, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} on 20 October 2019.comradewaddie96 ★ (talk)17:36, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2318 days ago on 13 October 2019)
Could an administrator, or a non-involved editor, pleaseassess consensus and close the RfC atWalmart Canada Bank#Removed Schedule II Banks of Canada category? No one seems to have objected to my untagging that redirect article with the given category for my given rationale. Any comments have been just that -comments. --Doug Mehus (talk)00:25, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}}comradewaddie96 ★ (talk)14:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2341 days ago on 21 September 2019)
Please review and close the two merger proposals under this heading. Note that we have a volunteer to carry out the first merger, if it is determined that there is consensus to merge. Thank you.bd2412T00:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Captain Eek^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓05:21, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

(Initiated 2410 days ago on 14 July 2019)
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please assess the consensus atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RFC: Moratorium on "general reliability" RFCs? Thank you. — Newslinger talk17:46, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

@Newslinger:Closed main discussion; keeping the others open for now due to insufficient discussion.ToThAc (talk)22:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

​Thank you. The remaining discussions don't need to be pinned, since they've already been open for comment for three months. — Newslinger talk19:49, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

@Newslinger: Is further action required here? If so, please remove the|done=y; if not, please add one of these templates -{{resolved}},{{done}},{{already done}},{{not done}},{{close}} - to your post in order to attract the attention ofClueBot III (talk ·contribs). --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)21:07, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

I'll mark this as{{already done}}. Thanks,Redrose64. — Newslinger talk21:25, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2307 days ago on 24 October 2019)
Would a non-involved administrator, or anexperienced editor, assess the consensus and close this discussion? We're at nine (9) oppose/strong oppose, all with the same or similar reasons, several comments and replies, and no sign of consensus going in favour of the nomination. Thanks. --Doug Mehus (talk)22:21, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Why not just let the other 2 days go and it'll be closed like any other RM.Crouch, Swale (talk)22:25, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

@Crouch, Swale: Oh, you're an administrator? I didn't know that. But what do you mean by "close like any other RM"? I didn't think RMs closed by themselves; someone had tofind it, close it if they felt comfortable doing so and had the necessary permissions, or an involved person had to request closure here. --Doug Mehus (talk)22:28, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

I'm just meaning wait until the 7 days have expired and it will fall intoWP:RME (which many editors monitor) in which case an uninvlved user will close it (unless something changes) as not moved.Crouch, Swale (talk)22:31, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

@Crouch, Swale: Ah, okay, wasn't aware of thatWP:RME page. That makes sense. How come some the move discussions listed below are so old, then? That is, how come editors haven't caught these, determined consensus (if any, or if no objections, closed as no objection) until now? (Sidebar: When I read your username each time, I keep thinking you're a law firm. LOL)--Doug Mehus (talk)22:35, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

@Dmehus: because the 7 days hasn't elapsed yet, as it says atWP:RME "The 7-day listing period has elapsed". Most discussions that have a clear consensus are closed shortly after they reach the 7 days of listing.Crouch, Swale (talk)22:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

@Crouch, Swale:, thanks again, but think you misunderstood my question. I wonder why those move discussions had to get listed here? I see some were malformed or did not use a proper consensus-building RfC or RM process, so that's one reason. Is another reason that some page moves get missed atWP:RME?Doug Mehus (talk)22:45, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

@Dmehus: You don't need to be an administrator to give advice on this page. Indeed, you asked for "... or anexperienced editor" - and Crouch, Swale is experienced. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)22:53, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

@Redrose64: Thanks, for clarity, I wasn't suggestingCrouch, Swale wasn't an experienced editor; quite the contrary. I just didn't realize that editors could also reply tothis page. I also see that editors can participate inWP:ANI discussions, providing comments, insight, citing policies, etc., so, really, are thereany pages wherebyonly admins are preferred to reply?Doug Mehus (talk)23:30, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}} – I've closed it as not moved per unanimous opposition. Not a chance that one more day of debate would swing the outcome. —JFG^talk06:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

@JFG: Thanks. That was my thinking. I figured an editor followingWP:RME would timely close thisWP:RM, but seeing as it was strong, well-cited unanimous opposition, it seemed sort of like,why bother waiting? Possibly the easiest consensus determination ever. ;-)Doug Mehus (talk)06:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2403 days ago on 20 July 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party/Archive 10#RfC on inclusion of claims in Panorama documentary and 64 peers' letter (advertisement)? Thanks,Cunard (talk)01:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} --GRuban (talk)16:08, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2394 days ago on 29 July 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Immigration and crime in Germany#RfC: "By Region" section? Thanks,Cunard (talk)01:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} byUser:S Marshall, showing creativity. --GRuban (talk)16:11, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2325 days ago on 6 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor please assess the consensus for moving page to "Woman suffrage procession (1913)" and not to the requested move title (or keeping as is) and please formally close the discussion atTalk:Woman suffrage parade of 1913#Requested move 6 October 2019. --Biotech46 (talk)19:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} byRedSlash 05:15, 30 October 2019 (UTC) –P. I. Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 09:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2321 days ago on 10 October 2019)
Could an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus in this discussion? Thanks!ToThAc (talk)05:20, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} byBD2412 --DannyS712 (talk)03:50, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2367 days ago on 26 August 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Montenegrin language#RfC about minority languages in infobox? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

• {{done}}Wug·a·po·des05:28, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2330 days ago on 2 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Red (Taylor Swift album)#RfC: Should "country" be kept as a genre in the infobox?? Thanks,Cunard (talk)08:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}}feminist (talk)15:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2330 days ago on 2 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTemplate talk:Infobox military unit/Archive 1#RfC on the usage of native_name field? Thanks,Cunard (talk)08:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

{{Close}}--- Coffeeandcrumbs12:40, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2349 days ago on 12 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death/Archive 1#RfC: Mention of Abel Basti and or his work? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

• {{done}} --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)08:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2328 days ago on 4 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor asses the consensus atWikipedia talk:Requests for permissions#Relationship of Articles for Creation and New Page Reviewer? Thanks and best,Barkeep49 (talk)03:06, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} by Primefac -[1] --DannyS712 (talk)02:16, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2500 days ago on 14 April 2019)
Would an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus in this discussion? Thank you. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)12:08, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} ‑‑Trialpears (talk)22:50, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2339 days ago on 23 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Feynman Prize in Nanotechnology#RfC again? Thanks,Cunard (talk)08:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{Close}} --- Coffeeandcrumbs07:02, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2316 days ago on 15 October 2019)
Could an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus in this discussion? Thanks!ToThAc (talk)18:55, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} by Scottywong --DannyS712 (talk)17:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2316 days ago on 15 October 2019)
Please could an uninvolved administrator assess the consensus in this discussion? Thanks! --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs)03:32, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} by Scottywong --DannyS712 (talk)17:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2316 days ago on 16 October 2019)
Please reviewWikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Spurs. --Jax 0677 (talk)16:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{done}} byBritishfinance. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)09:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2304 days ago on 28 October 2019)
Could an uninvolved administrator please take a look at this discussion and close it?Hijiri 88 (聖やや)13:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{Done}} byScottywong. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)09:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2441 days ago on 12 June 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 6#RfC: Header text? Thanks,Cunard (talk)09:38, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

• Doing...StevenCrossin^{Help resolve disputes!}13:36, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

  @Steven Crossin: Are you still doing this?* Pppery *_{it has begun...}00:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Since it's been a month since a previous editor expressed interest in closing with no change, I've gone ahead and closed it with arough consensus in favor of including the proposed text.(non-admin closure)Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)03:06, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2370 days ago on 23 August 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:People's Mujahedin of Iran#RfC about the MEK's appeal in its homeland? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Closed withno consensus ...established for making the proposed edits.(non-admin closure)Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)23:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2364 days ago on 29 August 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:David Koch#Lede rfc? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Closed withno consensus to including the information in the lede.(non-admin closure)Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)21:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2374 days ago on 18 August 2019)
Could an uninvolved experienced editor close this discussion? ‑‑Trialpears (talk)22:46, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}.ToThAc (talk)04:37, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2361 days ago on 1 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:U.S. state#Request for comment on state-equivalents? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Closed as a rough consensus tooppose including these territories in the article.(non-admin closure)Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)06:42, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2358 days ago on 3 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Paul Stamets#RfC about description of Paul Stamets in the lede? I am not closing this RfC as some of the supports are qualified supports. Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

This is a BLP with FRINGE issues, where there has been SOAP and COI problems. The RfC is a tad vague, but closure would help us move on. --Ronz (talk)01:08, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

• Requesting help. The RfC is fuzzy and not in the formal process. Some closure would inform next steps. Blue Rasberry(talk)22:10, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Closed with a clear consensus that the ledeshould describe the article subject as a "mycologist".(non-admin closure)Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)17:58, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2355 days ago on 6 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Donald Trump#RfC: books in lead? Thanks, ―Mandruss ☎23:43, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Closed with arough consensus to change the text and anarrow consensus to use Option D.(non-admin closure)Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)19:44, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2332 days ago on 30 September 2019)
Would an admin assess the consensus and close the discussions on the following proposals? There is theinitial "Yet Another Proposal" which as gone stale, which was then broken up into 4 parts in the "Last Attempt" (1,2,3,4), and thealternative proposal. Thanks. —MarkH21 (talk)22:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} by Ymblanter --DannyS712 (talk)20:06, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2298 days ago on 2 November 2019)
Any uninvloved admin may close this remaining request atWikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Page_mover#User:Störm by me. Thanks.Störm(talk)06:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} byPrimefac (talk) at 22:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC) –P. I. Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 00:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2294 days ago on 6 November 2019)
Could an administrator assess theANI incident and determine whether it had been amicably resolved between the two involved editors,Dennis Bratland, and myself and action appropriately? Thanks. (Note: we seemed to have resolved things amicably, so am just seeking a determination that this was the case and for case closure.) --Doug Mehus (talk)00:21, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} by Britishfinance --DannyS712 (talk)20:07, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2362 days ago on 30 August 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:List of music considered the worst#RFC for album inclusion? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Will do.∯WBG^converse03:50, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Are you doing? --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)16:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}} After relative silence on the prior close attempts, I have closed with a rough consensus tooppose these qualificationsas written.(non-admin closure)Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)19:51, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2343 days ago on 18 September 2019)
Merger proposal awaiting closureczar04:31, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}}N2e (talk)02:19, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2338 days ago on 24 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Council#RfC about tagging redirects? Thanks,Cunard (talk)08:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} — Newslinger talk07:35, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2335 days ago on 26 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia talk:Redirect#RfC on introducing redirects? Thanks,Cunard (talk)08:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

{{already done}} byS Marshall. — Newslinger talk07:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2301 days ago on 30 October 2019)
Would an uninvolved administrator please close this discussion? Thanks!ToThAc (talk)23:25, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

{{Close}} byScottywongAmericanAir88^(talk)18:06, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2313 days ago on 19 October 2019)
Please reviewthis reassessment. --Jax 0677 (talk)16:59, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

{{Close}} Consensus to keep.AmericanAir88^(talk)18:04, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2314 days ago on 17 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Jeremy Corbyn#RfC about the media being "hostile" or "negative" towards Corbyn? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

{{already done}} byS Marshall (talk ·contribs) --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)00:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2305 days ago on 27 October 2019)
Please relist or reviewthis discussion. --Jax 0677 (talk)22:58, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} –P. I. Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 05:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2489 days ago on 26 April 2019)
Would an experienced editor or administrator please reviewthis discussion? An older discussion on the subjectexists and might need to be considered as well.Tvx111:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Will someone please assess this discussion? This request has been open for months.Tvx112:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Mgasparin (talk)01:21, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2328 days ago on 3 October 2019)
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please assess the consensus atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: Liliputing? Thank you. — Newslinger talk09:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} --DannyS712 (talk)08:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2328 days ago on 4 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Catholic Church and homosexuality#Request for Comment: Claims of historian John Boswell? Thanks,Cunard (talk)08:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖15:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2317 days ago on 15 October 2019)
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please assess the consensus atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: "The Gateway Pundit" (October)? Thank you. — Newslinger talk08:06, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} --DannyS712 (talk)08:27, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2309 days ago on 23 October 2019)
It seems that all the active RfD closers have expressed an opinion in this discussion, so we need a fresh pair of eyes to come in and close the discussion.Deryck C.12:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

 RelistedP. I. Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 00:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} bymazca 22:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC).P. I. Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 07:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2288 days ago on 13 November 2019)

Could significantly benefit from an official close and statement on IiKkEe's talk page about the close, given the seriousness of the thread.Flyer22 Reborn (talk)15:37, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}.[2]starship.paint (talk)15:30, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2337 days ago on 25 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Siouxsie Sioux#Request for comments 2019? Thanks,Cunard (talk)08:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}.P. I. Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 11:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2280 days ago on 20 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Microbial symbiosis and immunity#Requested move 20 November 2019 about closing and moving the article? Thanks,Phillipebrown (talk)19:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

{{not done}}. RMs run a minimum of 7 days, and this one isn't old enough yet to close. Suggest we rely upon the RM system to close this request when the time comes.P. I. Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 22:04, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2324 days ago on 8 October 2019)
Seeking a formal closure by an uninvolved editor.  I believe the consensus is quite clear but because this will codify a specific understanding regardin MFD and CSD:G13, I am seeking a formal closure so that editors substituting their judgement are met with consensus based rejection.Hasteur (talk)02:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} -David Gerard (talk)23:08, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2317 days ago on 14 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:21 Savage#RfC: Should the first sentence declare that he is British?? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Iffy★Chat --19:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2302 days ago on 30 October 2019)
This (and the following sections,Poll on how long a moratorium on Requests for Move should be andA sad end to the moratorium?) could do with a close. The discussion follows on from an already-closed RM. Would do it myself, but I think my involvement in the discussion would cause problems.Kahastoktalk19:35, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

{{already done}} last week.Iffy★Chat --19:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2348 days ago on 14 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:International Brigades#RfC about Soviet citizens in International Brigades? Thanks,Cunard (talk)02:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} --DannyS712 (talk)05:32, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2315 days ago on 17 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTemplate talk:Effective altruism#RFC on Key People? ThanksXodarap00 (talk)19:29, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}.Cunard (talk)02:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2314 days ago on 17 October 2019)
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please assess the consensus atTalk:Jeffrey Epstein#RfC: Virginia Giuffre and Bill Clinton? Thank you. — Newslinger talk00:24, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}.Cunard (talk)02:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2308 days ago on 23 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#RfC on inclusion criteria for lists of political endorsements? Thank you. -MrX 🖋18:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Noticed this while at VPP.Doing.... Best,Barkeep49 (talk)00:05, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

And{{done}}Barkeep49 (talk)00:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2307 days ago on 25 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Tim Pool#RFC on allegation that Pool promoted Seth Rich conspiracy theory? Thanks,Cunard (talk)02:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} --DannyS712 (talk)05:33, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2303 days ago on 29 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Dennis Bonnen#RfC on the consequences of anti-vaccine activism? Thanks,Cunard (talk)02:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} --DannyS712 (talk)05:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2300 days ago on 1 November 2019)
Please reviewTemplate talk:Bea Miller#Remove the release year from the albums. --Jax 0677 (talk)17:33, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}.Cunard (talk)02:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2445 days ago on 9 June 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Sabine Weyand#Request for comments on perceived coat-rack issue? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}} Closed asmoot due to the acceptance of the "newer" text.Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)23:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2409 days ago on 15 July 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:White Croats#RfC about the splitting of the article "White Croats"? Thanks.--Miki Filigranski (talk)20:50, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}} Closed asno consensus to make the proposed edits.(non-admin closure)Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)22:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2323 days ago on 8 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Kosovo#Should the article call Kosovo a state? RfC? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}, closed asno consensus.Invalid^OS (talk)15:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2351 days ago on 11 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Propaganda#Request for comment on first images of article? Thanks,Cunard (talk)02:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Captain Eek^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓17:20, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2408 days ago on 15 July 2019)
Would an uninvolved editor please assess consensus in this ancient CfD discussion? Thanks! ‑‑Trialpears (talk)23:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

@Trialpears:{{done}}.ToThAc (talk)21:27, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2324 days ago on 7 October 2019)
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please assess the consensus atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC: The Epoch Times? Thank you. — Newslinger talk01:30, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

@Newslinger:{{done}}.ToThAc (talk)17:46, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2360 days ago on 1 September 2019)
Would an uninvolved editor please assess consensus in this ancient CfD discussion? Thanks! ‑‑Trialpears (talk)23:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

@Trialpears:{{already done}} byFayenatic london.ToThAc (talk)17:48, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2326 days ago on 6 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#RfC to delete Speculation and rumor, even from reliable sources, are not appropriate encyclopedic content from WP:CRYSTAL? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}} –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖00:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

(Initiated 2296 days ago on 5 November 2019)
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please assess the consensus atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Newsweek RfC? Thank you. — Newslinger talk13:06, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

{{already done}} byMJL. — Newslinger talk20:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2618 days ago on 17 December 2018)
Could someone please try to come to an assessment of whether there is a consensus to merge. Situation has not been made clearer by a few socks being struck, and edit-warring is going on. --Elmidae(talk ·contribs)20:45, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}.Primefac (talk)13:16, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2326 days ago on 6 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:BMW M3#RfC about announcements of future vehicles? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} by El C.Cunard (talk)08:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2308 days ago on 24 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:2019 Canadian federal election 1#Request for Comment: Election maps in Canada? Thanks,Cunard (talk)02:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} by Brythones.Cunard (talk)08:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2298 days ago on 2 November 2019)
Can an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Bitcoin Cash#RfC: Does the video cited in the article confirm the claim it is purportedly confirming? Thanks.Ladislav Mecir (talk)06:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}.Cunard (talk)08:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2292 days ago on 8 November 2019)
Please reviewthis discussion. --Jax 0677 (talk)13:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}.Cunard (talk)08:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2499 days ago on 16 April 2019)
Please reviewthis discussion. --Jax 0677 (talk)14:48, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}.Cunard (talk)08:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2331 days ago on 1 October 2019)
Would an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus inthis discussion. Thank you. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)17:13, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

{{not done}} because it is not a merger discussion. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)03:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2328 days ago on 4 October 2019)
Could an experienced and uninvolved editor please review this merger proposal. Thank you.  N2e (talk)21:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Review, please.Rowan Forest (talk)14:51, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Woah, no uninvolved editor ever looked at this closure request!? --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)16:54, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Like... seriously this is way overdue. We need to get on with a merger/rename but are waiting on someone to close this. —Insertcleverphrasehere^{(or here)}_{(click me!)}23:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}} byInsertcleverphrasehere, an involved editor. The reason for doing so is because no uninvolved editor came forward to determine the consensus.Uninvolved editors: please do the needful when requested. I shall be highly grateful to you. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)03:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2288 days ago on 13 November 2019)
Please reviewthis discussion. --Jax 0677 (talk)13:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}.Cunard (talk)08:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2280 days ago on 21 November 2019)
Please reviewthis discussion. --Jax 0677 (talk)18:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}.Cunard (talk)08:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2278 days ago on 23 November 2019)
Please reviewthis discussion. --Jax 0677 (talk)19:03, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}.Cunard (talk)08:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2268 days ago on 2 December 2019)
Would an uninvolved editor please assess the consensus atTalk:Fencing practice and techniques#Requested move 2 December 2019? Thanks!Jslimmer (talk)13:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} by DannyS712.Cunard (talk)08:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2310 days ago on 21 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 October#Ranks in the Boy Scouts of America? Thank you!P. I. Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 19:33, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} byqedk at 10:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC) –PI Ellsworth  ed. ^put'r there 02:54, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2279 days ago on 22 November 2019)
I think that only an administator can properly closethis discussion. --Jax 0677 (talk)22:58, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

{{already done}} byTrialpears (talk ·contribs) --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)00:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2290 days ago on 10 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atthe RfC atTalk:Strictly Come Dancing (series 17)#Using first name or surname? Thanks,Cunard (talk)09:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} --DannyS712 (talk)22:18, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2286 days ago on 14 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Jo-Ann Roberts#RFC about notability tag? Thanks,Cunard (talk)09:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} --DannyS712 (talk)22:07, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Cunard, thanks for requesting this. Interesting, this was on my to-do list to reach out toyou as an experienced, non-involved editor who might be interested in assessing consensus. Nonetheless, I appreciateDannyS712 doing this.Doug MehusT·C22:14, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2367 days ago on 26 August 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTemplate talk:Infobox film#RfC: Is it relevant to list all composers for the film's music score and songs?? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Archived toTemplate talk:Infobox film/Archive 30#RfC: Is it relevant to list all composers for the film's music score and songs? without closure. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖17:24, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Unarchived to provide formal close as arough consensus tojudiciously credit additional composers.(non-admin closure)Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)04:09, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2352 days ago on 9 September 2019)
RfC requesting an admin closing.  Thanks,Springee (talk)02:13, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

{{DONE}} Closed asno consensus for the proposed inclusion.(non-admin closure)Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)02:56, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2322 days ago on 9 October 2019)
Would a non-involved editor/administrator please assess the consensus for this expired RfC, which Legobot dropped? There seems to be no opposition, but it would be nice to have thisassessed, possibly wrapped in theoptional RfC closure tags of your choice. Alternatively, if you know of a way torestart the RfC, that would be fine as well. Thanks. --Doug Mehus (talk)18:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

@Dmehus: Legobot "dropped" it because thirty days had elapsed.WP:RFC#Restarting an RfC explains how an RfC may be extended. But if nobody (other than myself, who frankly doesn't care about the matter) commented there the first time, the chances of more people coming along are small. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)00:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Redrose64, Thanks, as a non-involved participant, can you close it as "no opposition" in more than a month? I just want something to go back on if I make the changes and it gets reverted, I can say that it was proposed without opposition—of course, someone is welcome to restart anew discussion, but at least we'd have some consensus determination on file.Doug Mehus  T·C00:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Closed asNo opposition expressed.(non-admin closure)Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)03:36, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2340 days ago on 22 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about rivers#RfC about the examples of local names? The RfC initiator wrote, "I stand by my decision to start this discussion until it is legitimately closed (preferably by an admin)" in response to an RfC participant writing, "This Rfc is not an Rfc; rather, it is a free-ranging discussion about how to improve a proposed new project subpage recommendation." Thanks,Cunard (talk)08:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Closed asno consensus after nearly 3 months with extremely limited participation.(non-admin closure)Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)02:07, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2367 days ago on 26 August 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 August#General American English? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Iffy★Chat --18:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2267 days ago on 3 December 2019)
Note: was last relisted on December 11. Discussion is no longer productive. Looking for a close.Lightburst (talk)02:05, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

{{already done}} byBD2412 (talk ·contribs) --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)08:47, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2250 days ago on 20 December 2019)
Page speedily deleted under G11 after nom. –UnnamedUser (talk;contribs)01:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} ‑‑Trialpears (talk)01:26, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2352 days ago on 9 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Marvin Minsky#RfC on Giuffre/Epstein issue? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}} --llywrch (talk)22:11, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

(Initiated 2292 days ago on 8 November 2019)
When the time comes, could a completely uninvolved admin, and ideally more than one, close this, please? It has policy implications, so I'm asking that it be closed by an admin/admins with no prior involvement in these type of discussions. PingingNewslinger, who opened the RfC. Newslinger, I hope you don't mind that I posted this.SarahSV^(talk)00:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for creating this request,SarahSV. This RfC is acentralized discussion, and multiple editors have requested a closure by a panel of uninvolved administrators. — Newslinger talk18:26, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

{{already done}} byJo-Jo Eumerus due to lack of volunteers for a panel closure. — Newslinger talk12:57, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2346 days ago on 16 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 217#RFC on Sorting of Names with Particles? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Consensus is against either option A or B exclusively. While there is rough consensus for option C (It depends), there is no consensus on what it should depend on. Some commenters say it should depend on the subject's preference; others say to follow the article's sources; yet others say to follow cultural conventions.WP:MCSTJR may provide some guidance. -MrX 🖋22:07, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2338 days ago on 23 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Veridia#RfC regarding genre? Thanks,Cunard (talk)08:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}} Closed as consensus to list Veridia as an Alternative rock band. No consensus for also listing it as a Christian rock band. -MrX 🖋18:04, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2335 days ago on 26 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Singapore/Archive 13#RFC regarding the inclusion of Rankings? Thanks,Cunard (talk)08:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Consensus to omit the rankings paragraph in the lead.-MrX 🖋18:13, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2334 days ago on 27 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Image and Reality of the Israel–Palestine Conflict#RFC? Thanks,Cunard (talk)08:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Closed as consensus to exclude the proposed paragraph (sentence) from the article. -MrX 🖋18:26, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2329 days ago on 3 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Fred Hampton#RFC on Murder terminology? Thanks,Cunard (talk)08:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

• Taking this one. Due to the holidays & family demands on my time, it may be a few days before I complete this closure. --llywrch (talk)22:31, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Closed as no consensus. (Sorryllywrch, I did not see that you planned to close this until it was too late.) -MrX 🖋18:40, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2325 days ago on 7 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Right-wing populism#RfC: Is this material linking right-wing populism with fascism UNDUE?? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Consensus is that the proposed material is UNDUE. -MrX 🖋19:08, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2322 days ago on 9 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#RFC on Internet or internet for inclusion in the WP:MOS/CAPS? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Closed as no consensus. -MrX 🖋19:36, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2320 days ago on 12 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atthe RfC atTalk:Lana Del Rey#Lana Del Rey infobox genres? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Consensus for including the following genres in the infobox: Baroque pop, Dream pop, Rock music. -MrX 🖋19:50, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2319 days ago on 13 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Emilia Clarke#Request for comment on Including Clarke Dating MacFarlane? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Consensus to not include one sentence stating that "Clarke dated actor and comedian Seth MacFarlane from 2012 to 2013". -MrX 🖋19:54, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2319 days ago on 13 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Fianna Fáil#Requests for comment? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Closed as no consensus. -MrX 🖋20:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2315 days ago on 16 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Responses to the 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis#RfC: Should Venezuelan crisis-related articles use terms like 'pro-Maduro', and, if not, what alternatives can be used?? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Closed as non consensus. -MrX 🖋20:13, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2299 days ago on 2 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Rojava#RfC: the lede paragraph? Thanks,Cunard (talk)09:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} There is rough consensus for option B. -MrX 🖋21:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2297 days ago on 3 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atthe RfC atTalk:Sierra McCormick#Should this article have an infobox? Thanks,Cunard (talk)09:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Consensus is to retain the infobox. -MrX 🖋21:42, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2296 days ago on 5 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atthe RfC atTemplate talk:Infobox person#Residence parameter? Thanks,Cunard (talk)09:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} There is consensus to remover the|residence= parameter. -MrX 🖋21:37, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2291 days ago on 10 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:iPhone 11#RfC about including pricing information in article? Thanks,Cunard (talk)09:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Consensus is against including a chart that includes pricing information of the iPhone 11 in various countries. -MrX 🖋20:33, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2289 days ago on 12 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Julian Assange#RFC on Julian Assange location and condition? Thanks,Cunard (talk)09:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} No consensus to include "where United Nations special rapporteur on torture Nils Melzer has said Assange's life is at risk". Rough consensus to include "Assange is incarcerated in HM Prison Belmarsh". -MrX 🖋21:16, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2281 days ago on 20 November 2019)
Please reviewthis discussion. --Jax 0677 (talk)20:17, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Consensus is against changing the talk page archive period to shorter than 14 days. -MrX 🖋21:25, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

(Initiated 2350 days ago on 12 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Milo Yiannopoulos#RFC - Improving the lede? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}} Although closed as "No consensus", I left a suggestion for a path forward to act on the proposed changes. --llywrch (talk)16:42, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2317 days ago on 14 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:2019 Halle synagogue shooting#RFC about article title? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

NNot done and not likely to be done Improper RfC mooted by a subsequent move request. -MrX 🖋20:09, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

{{not done}} as above. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)23:17, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2244 days ago on 27 December 2019)
Would an administrator assess the consensus there? (Though it might not be that hard...)|abequinn^fourteen05:33, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Was just gonna file a request here. There's been one vote in the last week and unanimous (-1) consensus. The holding page isWikipedia:General sanctions/Michael Jackson. There are templates that need to be made and edited, the closer will need to wrap up all of that too. Any experienced editor can close this too, the consensus is not that hard to assess. --qedk (t桜c)09:22, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}} by someone else.|abequinn^fourteen21:29, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2358 days ago on 3 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#RFC: Block edits that contain a VisualEditor bug? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Since the RfC is about the creation of an edit filter, I'm leaving a note atthe edit filter noticeboard requesting that it be closed by an edit filter manager; it seems pretty clear that the consensus is for the creation of a filter, but such a decision could only be enacted by an efm. --DannyS712 (talk)01:32, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

• {{not done}} because it is an archived discussion. Please revive the discussion to assess the consensus. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)07:38, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

  {{done}}.Cunard (talk)08:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2343 days ago on 19 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atthe RfC atWikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 162#Proposal to delete Portal space? Thanks,Cunard (talk)08:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

• {{not done}} because it is an archived discussion. Please revive the discussion to assess the consensus. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)07:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

  Withdrawn as{{not done}} since there is clearly no consensus in the discussion.Cunard (talk)08:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2288 days ago on 13 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 155#Use of direct transclusion in portals and the newer portal transclusion templates? Thanks,Cunard (talk)09:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{not done}} because it is an archived discussion. Please revive the discussion to assess the consensus. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)07:40, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

  Removed not done template. RfCs are regularly closed after they have been archived. That an RfC is archived is not a good reason not to assess the consensus. This RfC appears to have a clear consensus but I am not closing it as itCunard (talk)08:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

  {{done}}.Cunard (talk)08:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2325 days ago on 6 October 2019)
Would an uninvolved editor please assess consensus in this ancient CfD discussion? Thanks! ‑‑Trialpears (talk)14:41, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

• Note: This was relisted toWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 December 5#Category:Films based on real people --DannyS712 (talk)22:03, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
• {{already done}} on 5 December byUser:DannyS712. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)07:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2600 days ago on 4 January 2019)
Discussion is about mergingKira Pika toKirarin Revolution with unclear consensus.lullabying (talk)17:31, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Mgasparin (talk)23:50, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2364 days ago on 28 August 2019)
Please reviewTalk:Donajowsky#Article merge discussion.Staszek Lem (talk)00:45, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}}GenQuest^{"Talk to Me"}13:14, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Could an administrator, please, enforce the AfD decision to delete the article on "Brahma Chellaney"? For some unfathomable reason, the article has been allowed to be resurrected by asingle-purpose account immediately after the AfD was closed.This discussion did not yield any results. -The Gnome (talk)16:11, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

I really don't think that this is a matter forWP:ANRFC. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)16:27, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

I agree. But it's been{{done}} anyway. Best,Barkeep49 (talk)17:13, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

(Initiated 2386 days ago on 6 August 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atthe RfC atWikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Suppress rendering of Template:Wikipedia books? Thanks,Cunard (talk)01:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

• Archived without closure atWikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 176#Suppress rendering of Template:Wikipedia books --DannyS712 (talk)02:42, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
• {{not done}} per above. Please revive the discussion to assess the consensus. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)07:36, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

• Removed not done template. An RfC close would be useful to determine whether the "Create a book" link on the sidebar of every article should be retained or removed. Changing the sidebar is a major decision and whether the discussion affecting the sidebar should be closed should not be dependent upon whether the discussion is archived.Cunard (talk)08:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} — Newslinger talk11:05, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

(Initiated 2313 days ago on 19 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Tulsi Gabbard#RFC on Science of Identity Foundation? Thanks,Cunard (talk)02:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} — Newslinger talk10:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

(Initiated 2284 days ago on 17 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTemplate talk:Infobox person#RfC: Should the Criminal charge label be changed to Criminal charge(s)?? Thanks,Cunard (talk)23:38, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} — Newslinger talk09:34, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

(Initiated 2275 days ago on 26 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTemplate talk:Sarah Palin#RFC about inclusion of a pornography link? Thanks,Cunard (talk)23:38, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} — Newslinger talk09:39, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2273 days ago on 28 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Battle of Dak To#RfC on pushpin map in Infobox? The map was first addedhere on 26 June 2019. There were thena series of reverts involving the map on 26 November 2019 and 27 November 2019 before this RfC was created. If the closer concludes there is no consensus, the closer will need to determine using the guidance inWP:NOCONSENSUS which version the article should default to.  Thanks,Cunard (talk)23:38, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

{{already done}} byArmbrust (talk ·contribs). --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)20:38, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2268 days ago on 2 December 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia talk:Did you know#RfC: Within our 200-character limit, does DYK prefer shorter over longer hooks?? Please close this once 30 days have passed. Thanks,Cunard (talk)23:38, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}} --qedk (t桜c)17:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2273 days ago on 28 November 2019)
Please reviewthis discussion. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)10:43, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}} by interested party.  YMerge completedGenQuest^{"Talk to Me"}04:06, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

(Initiated 2265 days ago on 6 December 2019)
Please reviewthis discussion. --Jax 0677 (talk)20:54, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

{{Not done}}. Since this discussion did not advance a specific proposal, there is not enough context to form a closing statement. If there is disagreement over the topics covered in the discussion, please start a clearly phrasedrequest for comment and request a closure of that.​ — Newslinger talk05:24, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

• Reply- Started RFC. --Jax 0677 (talk)06:29, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

(Initiated 2254 days ago on 16 December 2019)
Contentious move request resulting in no obvious consensus. Relisting may be required under a name that would garner more community consensus.Melmann11:25, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} — Newslinger talk05:11, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2251 days ago on 20 December 2019)
This RFC was the result of an edit war. There is zero support, apart from the editor who made it, toKeep#2 while there is some tacit support toRestore#1. Can it be resolved, so the article can move on?Wwwhatsup (talk)08:05, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

{{done}} –EdJohnston (talk)04:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2300 days ago on 1 November 2019)
Although there are still !votes, there have been no new substantive arguments for some time. -SchroCat (talk)17:31, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

The last edit was made eight days ago. This merger request is holding up a DYK nomination, so any help with it would be appreciated. --MelanieN (talk)20:13, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

{{Done}}Melmann16:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2266 days ago on 4 December 2019)
Please review the split proposal discussion (And a bold spilt was reverted during the discussion) .Matthew hk (talk)04:36, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

{{Close}}comradewaddie96 ★ (talk)11:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2245 days ago on 25 December 2019)
Disagreement over newly added text in the article. The talk page conversation has slowed considerably and the consensus seems reasonably clear, but it would probably be best if an uninvolved editor closed the discussion.Aoi (青い) (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Aoi (青い) (talk)19:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

{{Close}}comradewaddie96 ★ (talk)11:35, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2242 days ago on 28 December 2019)
Disagreement over inclusion of an image in an article. Since there is not much discussion and few editors involved, it might not be appropriate for any involved editor to judge whether there's consensus.152.208.24.217 (talk)13:09, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

{{Close}}comradewaddie96 ★ (talk)11:14, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2236 days ago on 3 January 2020)
Discussion aboutAmanda Henderson's use of "Sharon" in guessing Thunberg's name; this topic has turned into a defense of Amanda Henderson and plays no role in improving Thunberg's Wiki-page. Please close.Johnrichardhall (talk)17:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

{{done}}— Precedingunsigned comment added byFemkemilene (talk •contribs)09:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2358 days ago on 3 September 2019)
Merge discussion started in September 2019 that has had no further comments in the past almost-two-months. --/Alex/₂₁01:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

{{Done}}GenQuest^{"Talk to Me"}00:39, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2281 days ago on 19 November 2019)
Could a non-involved editor or administrator assess theconsensus and close the merger proposal for the above-captioned page?Note: you do not need tocomplete the merge as there are a number of willing regular page editors willing to do this. Thanks. --Doug MehusT·C20:15, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

• {{Done}} Merge discussion closed.GenQuest^{"Talk to Me"}02:20, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 3171 days ago on 12 June 2017)
Any experienced and uninvolved administrator can close this gigantic discussion. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)04:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

{{done}}Mgasparin (talk)00:48, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2414 days ago on 10 July 2019)
Would an uninvolved editor or administrator please review this discussion? Thank you. Note: This discussion started as an RFC, but the RCF was malformed, so it is not an RFC. Just a regular discussion. --Wikiman2718 (talk)05:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}}Mgasparin (talk)00:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2343 days ago on 18 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Super Audio CD#Rfc: Meyer-Moran paper from 2007 in lead section? Thanks,Cunard (talk)00:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Closed asno consensus for either inclusion or exclusion.(non-admin closure)Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)02:35, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2338 days ago on 23 September 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease#RfC: Redirects of "chronic bronchitis" and "emphysema"? Thanks,Cunard (talk)08:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

{{done}} Closed asrough consensus in favor of the redirects as proposed in Option 1.(non-admin closure)Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)03:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2391 days ago on 2 August 2019)
Could an uninvolved editor please determine a consensus from this discussion about the inclusion of one-day retirement contracts in NFL infoboxes? Thanks!Eagles 24/7 (C)15:43, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

{{Not done}}. This is the kind of discussion that, even if had been a formal RfC (and it doesn't appear to have been) would not need a formal close. Seewhen to close. Best,Barkeep49 (talk)15:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

@Barkeep49: I'm not sure I follow, are you referencing the fourth bullet from that section you linked to?Eagles 24/7 (C)16:06, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Eagles247, yes it was stale but I actually should have linked to the section above, specifically the first few sentences of the first paragraph. Best,Barkeep49 (talk)17:09, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

@Barkeep49: So if I make an edit adding in these one-day retirement contracts to an NFL infobox and link to the archived discussion that was never closed with a consensus, and promptly get reverted by an opposing editor from that discussion, what is the next step here?Eagles 24/7 (C)17:22, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2234 days ago on 6 January 2020)
Any uninvolved editor can close this discussion. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)04:32, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

• {{done}} by Tercer. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)07:14, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2235 days ago on 4 January 2020)
Would an experienced editor review the RfC atTalk:Qasem_Soleimani#RfC:_Should_the_article_say_Soleimani_was_"assassinated"_or_"killed"?, assess consensus and close the discussion?Darren-Mtalk14:42, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

{{done}} bySandstein (talk ·contribs) --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)11:27, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2346 days ago on 15 September 2019)
-FASTILY06:54, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

{{done}} bySandstein (talk ·contribs) --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)11:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2288 days ago on 12 November 2019)
--Tavix^(talk)00:31, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

{{done}} bySandstein (talk ·contribs) --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)11:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2222 days ago on 17 January 2020)
2 days old, but qualifies for a SNOW closure IMHO. I normally wouldn't bother, but it's a topic that's in the news, and the AfD notice prevents it (I assume) from showing up in Google to readers who may be interested in the topic. Sandstein07:50, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

• {{Done}} byMiraclepine(non-admin closure) --Doug MehusT·C21:45, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2230 days ago on 10 January 2020)
- discussion has trailed off, if not ceased, with one or more proposals which appear to have generatedsome consensus. In the course of the original discussion, the subject of theANI discussion has even consented to both an administrator-led mentorship arrangement and to voluntarily curtailing his or her XfD closures until conclusion of said mentorship. Would a non-involved administrator assess the consensus of the original discussion and the sub-proposal(s) that have stemmed from said discussion? Thanks. --Doug MehusT·C16:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

{{Not done}} - was archived without closure.Barkeep49 (talk)18:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2305 days ago on 26 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Aaron Hernandez#RfC on the Brain Damage section? Thanks,Cunard (talk)02:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}}_signed,Rosguill^talk18:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2314 days ago on 18 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia:Requests for comment/2019 community sentiment on binding desysop procedure? Thanks,Cunard (talk)05:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

I cannot close this as I participated in the discussion. No clue as to how any closer will handle the consensus (if any) in the workshop section. --qedk (t桜c)20:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}} --llywrch (talk)23:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2290 days ago on 10 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:List of sovereign states and dependent territories in Asia/Archive 1#RfC which version should stay? Thanks,Cunard (talk)09:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

{{Done}}_signed,Rosguill^talk01:23, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2289 days ago on 11 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Maps#RfC regarding claimed territorial boundaries of a state? Thanks,Cunard (talk)09:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{done}}. Closed with a finding that there is broader support in the discussion for the position that these issues must be solved on a case-by-case basis rather than through a general rule.BD2412T02:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2283 days ago on 17 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:List of countries and dependencies by area#RFC Should Palestine be numbered?? Thanks,Cunard (talk)23:38, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{done}}. Clear absence of consensus.BD2412T02:32, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2687 days ago on 9 October 2018)
Would an uninvolved editor please summarize and close a merge discussion relating toSoblet andSublette (surname).Klbrain (talk)21:38, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

• {{done}}. Closed as no consensus.BD2412T02:36, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2289 days ago on 12 November 2019)
- discussion has died down.19 votes on 12 November,20 votes on 13 November,10 votes on 14 November. Just 4 votes from 15 November to 22 November. Total vote count 53.starship.paint (talk)06:07, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

{{not done}} perLevivich:3-month-old report; this is too stale to be closed now; it wouldn't be policy compliant to impose an editing restriction 3 months later; that ship has sailed. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)08:59, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Noting for the record that I have closed the discussion as a warning.BD2412T05:06, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2285 days ago on 15 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:Sharyl Attkisson#RfC on self-sourcing? Thanks,Cunard (talk)23:38, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{done}}.BD2412T05:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2400 days ago on 24 July 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive314#Request for reclosure of RfC on Tulsi Gabbard's BLP (Assad/Modi)? This is an RfC close review that was archived without closure on6 October 2019. Like deletion reviews, RfC close reviews should be formally assessed to determine whether the RfC close was correct or incorrect. Thanks,Cunard (talk)08:36, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

In my view, this is not worth the effort, and should be dropped. It was archived after something like four comments, which doesn't seem enough to overturn a RfC closure even if that were found to be the consensus. Sandstein07:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

I do not object to archiving this without action based on your analysis, but pinging RfC close review initiatorSashiRolls (talk ·contribs) in case you would like this to be closed.Cunard (talk)08:06, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

{{not done}}.Cunard (talk)10:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2290 days ago on 10 November 2019)
I put the above discussion up a while ago and then forgot about it. It doesn't seem there were any opposes (though there was 1 "indifferent"). Could someone please close this, and implement the changes if they agree there is consensus in favor of the proposal? —pythoncoder (talk | contribs)22:36, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

{{done}}.Cunard (talk)10:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2213 days ago on 26 January 2020)
Article has been speedy deleted separately as unauthorised re-creation of previously deleted article; concurrent AfD should be closed. Thanks so much.Bookscale (talk)10:54, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

{{done}} --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)18:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2248 days ago on 22 December 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles/RFC on lead guideline for medicine-related articles? Thanks,Cunard (talk)10:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

{{already done}} byYmblanter (talk ·contribs) --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)23:39, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2311 days ago on 21 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atthe RfC atWikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television#MOS:TVIMAGE – explicitly allow (and maybe prefer?) show logos? Thanks,Cunard (talk)10:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

{{done}} Closed withno consensus to implement the proposed change.(non-admin closure)Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)20:15, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2250 days ago on 21 December 2019)
Any uninvolved administrator can close this discussion, which is concerned about the brand new "WikiProject:" prefix. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)04:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

{{already done}} byAmorymeltzer* Pppery *_{it has begun...}20:36, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2212 days ago on 28 January 2020)
Could an uninvolved administrator close the controversial and contested requested move atTalk:Death of Kobe Bryant#Requested move 28 January 2020. Thanks. —MarkH₂₁^talk20:43, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

• {{done}}.BD2412T02:05, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2209 days ago on 30 January 2020)
Please seeWikipedia talk:Requested moves#Speedy close needed, and previous requests for speedy closure by multiple editors atTalk:Syrian civil war#Requested move 30 January 2020. Immediately re-opening an RM when one simply doesn't like the outcome is against process. (Actual process: ask the closer to instead re-list; take the matter toWP:MRV; and wait several months and re-RM againiff there are new facts and arguments to present; in that order). I'm listing this here becauseWT:RM doesn't appear to be highly watchlisted; the bogus "anti-RM" could easily run its entire week without being closed. I'm starting to think that a section for speedy closure requests needs to be added toWP:RM/TR, since that actuallyis closely watched and rapidly acted upon by admins and pagemovers. — SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 18:48, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

{{already done}} byJJMC89* Pppery *_{it has begun...}03:05, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2309 days ago on 23 October 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atTalk:List of nicknames of presidents of the United States#RFC: Should recent presidents be included?? Thanks,Cunard (talk)10:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

{{Done}} --llywrch (talk)07:08, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2353 days ago on 8 September 2019)
—usernamekiran(talk)17:39, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

{{done}}—Wug·a·po·des​19:44, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2225 days ago on 14 January 2020)
Although eligible to close tomorrow,MfD discussions have tended to languish particularly well past the usual 7 day limit in comparison toAfD andRfD. As you'll see from theconsensus, there is ample agreement from all involved editors and administrators that the content dispute has been resolved amicably, other than the nominator, who favours deletion. Would an experienced editor (it doesn't have to be an administrator) assess the consensus and action the recommended actions? --Doug Mehus  T·C21:43, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

{{done}} by Rosguill --DannyS712 (talk)22:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2234 days ago on 5 January 2020)
Would an uninvolved experienced editor please close this discussion? -MrX 🖋18:41, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

{{done}}Mgasparin (talk)08:12, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2260 days ago on 11 December 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atthe RfC atTalk:Tesla Cybertruck#Which image should we use?? Thanks,Cunard (talk)10:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

• {{done}}BD2412T05:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2298 days ago on 3 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#RfC: Merge F9 into G12 redux? Thanks,Cunard (talk)09:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: archived without closure toWikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 75#RfC: Merge F9 into G12 redux --DannyS712 (talk)18:57, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

• {{not done}} per above. Please revive the discussion to assess the consensus. --Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)17:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
• {{done}}.Cunard (talk)02:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2222 days ago on 17 January 2020)
Requesting an experienced editor to assess the consensus atTalk:Germanic peoples/Archive 9#RfC: Is information and sources on peoples speaking Germanic languages and following other aspects of Germanic culture, within the scope of this article? The issue at hand is contentious, but the outcome of the RfC appears obvious. That's why I'm requesting closure this early. Thanks.Krakkos (talk)12:06, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

{{done}}.Cunard (talk)02:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2215 days ago on 25 January 2020)
Requesting an uninvolved experienced editor to assess the consensus atTalk:2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak#RfC on map of infected cases. Issue is contentious but consensus isn't much in doubt.Horse Eye Jack (talk)15:36, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

{{done}} by feminist.Cunard (talk)02:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2355 days ago on 6 September 2019)
Any uninvolved admin. Discussion about whether three specific items can be included in the article, one proposed to be newly added, and two which were removed absent discussion after long being in the article. 15:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

{{done}}.Cunard (talk)02:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2282 days ago on 19 November 2019)
Merge discussion with no new feedback in a month, closure from any uninvolved experienced editor would be appreciated.LM2000 (talk)05:51, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

{{done}}.Cunard (talk)02:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2234 days ago on 6 January 2020)
Would an uninvolved editor to close this "non-Rfc", !vote on the same issue that trying to revert the consensus / "status-quo" formed by previousRfC.Matthew hk (talk)07:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

{{done}}.Cunard (talk)02:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2208 days ago on 1 February 2020)
Very clear consensus but the article is move-protected, thus this can only be closed by an administrator.feminist (talk)03:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

{{done}} closed and filed a technical move request --DannyS712 (talk)09:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2222 days ago on 17 January 2020)
The discussion seems to have stalled for almost 3 weeks now. While a few have suggested a split, the overwhelming majority support moving the page per existing practice andWP:NAMECHANGES which calls for a rename, instead of a split now that the new name has been undeniably adopted byWP:RELIABLESOURCES. The page is currently move-protected so that it can only be moved by Admins.Starforce¹³00:15, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

•  Request withdrawn - it got taken care of. —Starforce¹³01:02, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

{{already done}} by BD2412 --DannyS712 (talk)08:05, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2253 days ago on 18 December 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Proposal: Procedural removal of admin rights who have not used the admin tools for a significant period of time (maybe 5 years)? Thanks,Interstellarity (talk)15:45, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

{{done}} by TonyBallioni --DannyS712 (talk)08:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Done -(Initiated 2292 days ago on 9 November 2019)
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus atWikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography#RfC: First mention in the first sentence... (MOS:JOBTITLES)? Thanks,Cunard (talk)02:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

{{Done}}Marcocapelle (talk)21:44, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Several speedy keeps now that this song has been released. Looks like consensus. ☆Bri (talk)04:32, 14 February 2020 (UTC)