This is afailed proposal. Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please usethe talk page or initiate a thread atthe village pump. |
| Please note: while the proposalin this form has been rejected, some of its substance has been incorporated atWikipedia:No personal attacks#External links, andWikipedia:Linking to external harassment. |
Attack sites are websites outsideWikipedia that are used to facilitate, promote, or encourage the harassment of individual Wikipedia editors. Harassment of those who choose to edit the encyclopedia is a serious matter. It discourages participation, and may put people in danger. These websites' activities include the malicious posting of abusive comments, physical threats, libel, and attempts to disclose the private information of Wikipedians.
In order to try and ensure the safety and well-being of theWikipedia community and its individual editors, attack sites should never be linked to or in any other way promoted.
For the purposes of this proposal, anattack site is a site outside Wikipedia that engages in any of the following:
An attack site might be run by an individual, in the form of a private website or a blog, or it could be a virtual community, such as another wiki or discussion forum.
Links to, promotion of, or material imported from any attack site may be removed. The removal of such material is not subject to thethree-revert rule. If the material removed was on a user page, you may leave the user a note explaining why it was removed. If found in article or project space, or in archives, removing it with a note in the edit summary would be sufficient.
Particularly virulent, deplorable, or hostile websites, may be placed on thespam blacklist for the safety and well-being of all Wikipedia users.
Users who repeatedly insert links to attack sites, import material from them, or persistently promote them, may be blocked for disruption after being warned. The appropriate length of the block depends on the severity of the violation, past warnings, and whether it is likely to be repeated.