- I Hate You with a Passion (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View log |edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)
Disputed prod. I was not able to find any reliable sources about the album. A Sputnikmusic user review is not reliable, and Allmusic isn't a review, not even a star score.Geschichte (talk)07:59, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I couldn't find any significant coverage, only passing mention in a possibly AI-generated book and its inclusion on the Billboard charts.Redirect toAndre Nickatina as anWP:ATD.Katzrockso (talk)09:49, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep: It did reach 2Billboard charts, problem is theBillboard website now has all of it's chart history behind a paywall, so it would be hard to source and the Allmusic website which used to display theBillboard charts back when the article was created, lost the rights to display theBillboard charts well over a decade ago.Beast from da East (talk)02:01, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- It didn't reach any national music charts, which I believe is the standard forWP:NALBUM.Katzrockso (talk)03:15, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect toAndre Nickatina. If noreliable sources whichcover the subject in detail exist then it is not notable and no amount of charting or certifications can help that. EvenWP:NMUSIC states sources are still required and charts/certifications don't automatically make something notable, just that the odds of it being notable may be higher. I've got an essayhere which discusses and clarifies this.λNegativeMP106:31, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I support redirecting it to Andre Nickatina.JuanBoss105 (talk)17:33, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I'm fine with redirecting, which makes us four. Regarding charts,WP:NALBUM only says that "a recordingmay be notable" if it for instance charted. Still, "All articles on albums or other recordings should meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, withsignificant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (emphasis mine).Geschichte (talk)05:15, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
