Three revert rule violation onJulius Caesar (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).User_talk:193.154.194.38 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 20:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onKenny Dalglish (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).82.156.33.151 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 22:59, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:This user was warned about their behaviour for the first time on the 5th August. After over a week of this, I'm finally reporting them for the first time.aLii22:59, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onKevin Barrett (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).68.43.120.176 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Comments:Violation of 3RR
Three revert rule violation on2002 Gujarat violence/2006 revision (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Subhash_bose (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule violation onRashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views)
Time report made: 19:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: User has been blocked for 3rr before and is aware of the rule.BhaiSaabtalk19:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment - Above user never warned Subhash_bose of violation. He made only three reverts, BhaiSaab only wishes to discredit Subhash_bose.BakamanBakatalk20:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
CommentWikipedia policy states prior notification for 15 hrs so that the alleged 3RR violator has the opportunity to undo his revert. Plus, I've been counting my reverts and they're less than three. The first case was an edit, not a revert. It is not even equivalent to a revert.Netaji20:56, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Issue with first revert - The first revert isnot even a revert.BakamanBakatalk20:59, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
I have protected the pageUser:Subhash bose (a.k.a. Netaji) due to an edit war over a sockpuppet notce.
Three revert rule violation onRashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).BhaiSaab (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 21:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: The 1st and 2nd diffs are reverts, but the 3rd and 4th are not. The 4th revert (which is somewhat misleading and should be showingthis diff I presume) isn't a diff but a comparison of two versions which Bakaman made two edits[6][7] in between.BhaiSaabtalk21:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onCrystal_Gail_Mangum (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Abe.Froman (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 21:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)+
User has been explained the difference between serving in the military and having the legal classification of a Veteran. It is his assumption that she is a Veteran. While no one is disputing the fact that she served in the military, that alone is not proof that she is a Veteran. There are many legal qualifications that she must meet before she is given that status. Serving in the military is just one of those qualifications, and is not the only qualification. No one has found a source, reliable or otherwise, which gives her legal status of a Veteran. We must remove this blurb of information until we do have a reliable source. Wikipedia is for facts, not assumptions or opinions.
User is well aware of the 3RR. It does not appear that he is interested in discussion, and will continue to revert edits.
Three revert rule violation onNorthern Ireland (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Setanta747 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 22:04, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: Discussion was ongoing but user keeps reverting and not supplying a request forWP:VERIFY andWP:NOR. Issues discussed on talk page and consensus was arrived at. The reported editor has contributed on wikipedia some time and should be aware of this policy.
Djegan22:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Djegan22:04, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Well, he had his warning, and now has a blockWilliam M. Connolley22:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onTemplate:Infobox Television episode (edit | [[Talk:Template:Infobox Television episode|talk]] |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).A Man In Black (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 08:03, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: User does not understand the fact that removing the tag causes disruption to hundreds of pages, user also a sysop and making block threats towards me!Matthew Fenton (Talk |Contribs)08:03, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
MatthewFenton is staging a one-man revert war to force his color functionality into that article, including reverting four times 24 hours and 7 minutes and edit warring using popups. He's ignored all suggestions that he not insert this code into the template, to the point where he counted comments that said "No, please stop doing this" as "Support" votes, then cited that vote tally as a reason that he should be able to ignore all criticism of his lousy color idea.
Usersed g2s (talk ·contribs),Combination (talk ·contribs), myself, andfreakofnurture (talk ·contribs) have all removed this code from the template, whereas the only ones to insert it are Fenton and a relatively new user namedInsanity13 (talk ·contribs).
I may have violated the 3RR, but who is carrying out a revert war here? -A Man InBl♟ck(conspire |past ops)08:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onBarbara Bauer (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Marky48 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
(and additionally, after I placed a warning onUser talk:Marky48 and responded to his belief that he hadn't by providing the above 4 links[18])
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Additional notes:
Time report made: 11:15, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:This user is a stalker and has harassed me over the said article for months. I've asked for help removing his repeated attacks from Will Beback who knows about it. Three in one day is my understanding of this rule. I reverted on two separate days.Marky4811:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onNaruto Uzumaki (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Kingdom hearts lll (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 09:51, 15 August 2006
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onFerrari (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Riddle9 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 15:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:Previously spammed the same link to the same pages as an anonymous IP (seeUser contributions for this IP). Under this IP, violatedWP:3RR and I reported him on (17:23, August 10, 2006. As a result he wasblocked for two weeks.
Yeees... I've blocked, but: please steer clear of 3RR yourself. In this case I've made an exception since a whole pile of users seems to have reverted this addition in the pastWilliam M. Connolley16:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onLexus LS (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Samstayton (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 01:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: This users has been in a mini-edit war before. He was warened and complied with the 3RR policy. Today however he decided that is despite a recent warning that four reverts in 24h can lead to a block, he would break the rule.
8hWilliam M. Connolley18:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onIran (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).203.81.192.67 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 02:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: The user was warned after his 4th revert, but went ahead and did a 5th revert. I can't state if his reverts are removing bad or good content, but it has squashed other valuable work, and a revert is a revert regardless. --Jeff300002:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
24hWilliam M. Connolley18:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onMacedonia (region) (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).66.167.231.136 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 03:49, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:The user has been consistently adding advertisement website about the Republic of Macedonia, containing some controversial statements.FunkyFly03:49, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
24hWilliam M. Connolley18:19, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onBall hog (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).69.181.54.126 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report: 03:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: Second offense, additionally IP refuses to to respond to any mention of compromise in the edit war, simply refuses to accept any possible outcome except for his exact goal.--Wildnox03:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
24hWilliam M. Connolley18:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onMacedonia (region) (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).FunkyFly (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 09:33, 16 August 2006 (PST)
Comments: The user has been consistently removing perfectly valid links for the Macedonia article. Made stupid comment: "(Homeland of Alexader the Great, yeah right :))" User:66.167.231.136 09:33, 15 August 2006 (PST)
Three revert rule violation onPashtun people (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).AbdulQadir (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 04:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
2006-08-16T05:01:01 Blnguyen (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "AbdulQadir (contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (3RR Pashtun people)William M. Connolley18:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onMutilation (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Tomyumgoong (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 09:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
User deleted 3RR warninghere, and also deleted much of the contested article's talk page, including objections to his editshere.Jakew09:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
History shows 5 reverts in 24 hours, and removal of warnings from user page. 24 hrs. --Avi16:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onSveasoft (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).61.222.136.170 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 20:29, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: Repeat offender; requested page semi-protection as well.
2006-08-15T21:28:56 Secretlondon (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "61.222.136.170 (contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (3RR on Sveasoft)William M. Connolley18:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onChristianity (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Codex_Sinaiticus (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
After warning, user made this comment onTalk:Christianity:
Time report made: 18:14, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Thank you. —Aiden18:14, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onArvanites (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Deucalionite (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 22:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Complex reverts; constant reverted element across all four instances is the re-insertion of the phrase "Albanian-speaking Greek settlers" instead of "Albanian settlers" in the first sentence of the "History" section (a hotly contentious POV detail discussed on talk page). Otherwise various additions and re-insertions into a text that was substantially rewritten in the meantime by other users. Deucalionite had previously inserted the same phrase and some other changes 7 times within 10 days in a slow edit-war below the 3RR threshold (3 Aug,5 Aug,8 Aug,9 Aug,11 Aug,12 Aug,12 Aug). User has announced that he will continue to revert irrespective of other editors' opinions ([21]). Was earlier blocked for 48 hours as a repeat offender in a similar case, revert-warring over a similar topic, onSouliotes.Fut.Perf.☼22:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onIslamophobia (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Netscott (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 11:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: The reversions are slightly different to evade 3RR and game the system, but they all amount to inserting OR tags or commenting out a widely accepted section, which is absolutely against the consensus on the talk page and have all been reverted by many other people. This is a long-time user with many archives of his talk page, not a new user or anon, so I assumed a warning was unnecessary.Deuterium11:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
This is a page with many reverts from many users. It seems that none have broken the 3RR as of now, but that many have come close. --Robdurbar22:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation on2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).64.107.1.31 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 23:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: Repeatedly removes casualty numbers provided by official sources, and replaces them with other numbers from marginal and possibly non-WP:RS web sites.
Three revert rule violation onVeronica Mars (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).68.77.3.236 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 00:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: Asked user to discuss his edit on his Talk Page, but he reverted the article again in violation of 3RR to contain his original edit that wasn't cited and is speculative in nature. He was warned by another user about prohibitions against OR on Wiki. He's also reverted reverts of his uncited edits onThe Suite Life of Zack and Cody (though not in violation of the 3RR) and I warned him about the 3RR on his Talk page. He then reverted the article a fifth time in 24 hours, and I warned him about the 3RR, which you can see in a diff here:1:19, August 16, 2006.
NOTE: The above report does not appear to have been done correctly, as it uses oldIDs, reports times in an unspecified timezone, and is chronologically backward. Here is the diff-based version with UTC times and in forward order, including asixth reversion from the same anonymous editor in 12 hours:
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
I have not issued a third warning, as it seems counterproductive unless someone takes action on the first two.
Time report made: 04:08, 17 August 2006 (UTC) byJeff Q (talk)
Comments:
24hWilliam M. Connolley08:14, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onIran-Iraq War (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).64.231.199.31 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log) and69.197.208.3 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
First of all,this diff shows where 69.197.208.3 admits to being the same user as 64.231.199.31. 69.197.208.3 saysas I said before "We can only quote them about what they ACTUALLY DID to confirm that they accept the obvious truth...". 64.231.199.31 is the one who made that quote,here.
At that point, I warned the user. This is an OLDID, not a diff, because it was the first post on his user page:17:19, August 16, 2006
The user's IP then changed, but he admitted (as shown above) that they were the same user. Another anon,User:65.190.135.228, came by and completely removed the disputed paragraph, stating that "The source is not correctly summarized":
69.197.208.3 then came in and inserted a revised paragraph:
This may or may not be a revert.User:Jonearles then removed the revised paragraph, stating that "The paragraph still doesn't accurately summarize the source." 69.197.208.3 reverted:
This is a definite revert, the 6th within 24 hours, after being warned about the 3RR. Note that these last edits come with summaries stating that the user is editing in accordance with the talk page. This implies consensus, when in fact he simply stated "this is what I'm going to do" and then posted it.
Time report made: 02:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
I've sprotected the articleWilliam M. Connolley08:06, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation on {{Article|[[WP:AN/3RR]}}.Netscott (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 02:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:Trying to interfere with 3RR process.Deuterium02:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Both blocked for 12h. Please stop fightingWilliam M. Connolley07:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onRace and intelligence (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Ramdrake (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 05:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments The 4th reversion is a reversion of different text within the same dispute (which is being discussed underTalk:Race_and_intelligence#Verifiability). This is considered a violation of the 3RR policy of "Do not revert any single pagein whole orin part." --Admissions05:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onChristianity (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Codex Sinaiticus (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 06:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: User was blocked for 8 hours today for 3RR violations on this same page. As soon as his block expired, he reverted the section, again violatingWP:3RR, as he at that point had 7 reverts in a 24 hour period.
Three revert rule violation onJalal ad-Din Muhammad Rumi (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).62.143.76.166 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 15:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Insulting comments and bad langauge used by this anon user on the talk page:[23]Khosrow II15:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
3rr + incivility = 24hWilliam M. Connolley16:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
This is in regards to the articleIndian martial arts. Freedom skies seems to be reverting the article back to prior versions which he feels represent his views, however false they may be. Various other users like kennethtennyson, me, and JFD have placed the title NPOV and the title (disputed) on the article which he has removed. It might be a good idea to block the article with a title stating NPOV or disputed as this might lead to an edit war.Steelhead23:20, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Can I trouble you to format your report properly?William M. Connolley18:44, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onScandinavia (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).comanche_cph (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 18:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
The reversions are not exactly the same thing over and over, but show a pattern of warring over this article and taken as a whole, it's clear to me 3RR was broken, this user has restored the article to the same version enough times to show warring. I (Lar (talk •contribs •blocks •protects •deletions •moves) ) have blocked for 24h. This is a pro forma report in case another admin disagrees. The user has threatened that he will "report me" if I don't unblock. So here I am, reporting myself. ++Lar:t/c18:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onTimur (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Technajunky (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 21:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: This user is new and may not be familiar with Wikipedia's 3RR. However, this does not excuse his vandalism. In those 4 reverts, he has kept on deleting an authoritative source (from theEncyclopaedia of Islam) without any reason. He simply does not like the message. This is a clear act of vandalism.Tājik21:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onBabri_Mosque (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Subhash_bose (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 21:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: User has been blocked for 3rr violation before.BhaiSaabtalk21:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
The truth of the matter - This is merely a farce to get Subash (whose viewpoint BhaiSaab opposes) banned. Three were to combat vandalism by BhaiSaab and one was a merging of two sections (hardlly classified as a revert).BakamanBakatalk22:38, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
If showing that a source is so obviously misrepresented, then yes what I did was vandalism. The third revert shows Netaji deleting "failed verification" tags.BhaiSaabtalk01:11, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
The three revert rule requires that users do not 'undo the edits of others' four or more times. Subhash bose has done this on this article, and is banned for a second violation in a couple of days --Robdurbar08:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onBabri_Mosque (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).BhaiSaab (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 22:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: User has been blocked for 3rr violation before. Some of his edits above are effectively reverts. The reversions are slightly different to evade 3RR and game the system. My reverts, while being more than 3RR, were to revert his vandalism of a sourced article (placed in the article not by myself).Netaji22:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Support - BhaiSaab has been vandalizing the article and removing sentences that don't fit his POV. He was trying to discredit the same (well-sourced and verifiable) section 6 times in an hour.BakamanBakatalk22:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment - BhaiSaab has been blockedtwice before for 3RR.BakamanBakatalk22:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Baka, how many comments do you need to make? I only have three reverts here - the rest are not reverts as is plainly obvious.BhaiSaabtalk01:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
This may seem to be none of my business, but hopefully an outside view will help. I think the problem is that the two of you are in the middle of anedit war. The three of you should go toWikipedia:Dispute_resolution for the best ways to resolve your issues. Ask for mediation or arbitration; just something other than trying to call 3RR on each other. I would be willing to believe that a smart admin would either not block either of you, or block both of you. Either way, I think Dispute Resolution is where you need to go. --Targetter(Lock On)01:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onIslamophobia (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Netscott (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 23:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: The reversions are slightly different to evade 3RR and game the system, but they all amount to inserting OR tags or commenting out a widely accepted section, which is absolutely against the consensus on the talk page and have all been reverted by many other people. This is a long-time user with many archives of his talk page, not a new user or anon, so I assumed a warning was unnecessary.Deuterium11:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
I would suppor a block of Deuterium for a violation ofWP:POINT for relisting this. --PinchasC |£€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€00:09, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Reported byStirling Newberry03:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Repeatedly banned user Ray Lopez up to his usual nonsense
Could you fmt, please?William M. Connolley08:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onShepard Fairey (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Sean Black (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 08:11, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Vn reverted to is same as 1st rv, so its only 3RWilliam M. Connolley08:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onGlenn_Danzig (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).G.g. (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 09:01, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: User started blanking and reverting discussions page too. Can't revert original article myself because of the rule, but talk pages are example of vandalism, hope 3rr doesn't count there.Enzigel09:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onList of famous tall men (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).193.154.194.38 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: (12:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC))
Comments:
Diffs please, like it sezWilliam M. Connolley21:35, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onMagyarization (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Latinitas (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 20:42, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
8h. There are various allegations of socks floating around, which I didn't evaluateWilliam M. Connolley21:32, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onNanking Massacre (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).John Smith's (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 21:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onUser_talk:Dionyseus (edit | [[Talk:User_talk:Dionyseus|talk]] |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Dionyseus (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 07:11, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: User is removing legitimate warnings from his talk page while making abusive edit summaries.jgpTC07:11, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I think this report is spurious. Like it sez in the rules, you're very unlikely to get blocked for 3RR on your own talk pageWilliam M. Connolley08:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onFreemasonry (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).80.81.159.20 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) : This is a known LTA vandal who knows precisely what he is doing and doesn't particularly care about 3RR.
Time report made: 14:21, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:Most likely vandalism by a Lightbringer sock.
24hWilliam M. Connolley14:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onFreemasonry (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).ALR (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Previous version reverted to15:35, 18 August 2006
Three revert rule violation onSlovakization (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Juro (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 23:32, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onAaron_Doral (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Philwelch (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 01:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:This user is a sysop who should know better than to edit war. According to theAN/I report, he has engaged in edit warring tonight on several Battlestar Gallactica articles, and has apparently banned several users who are trying to protect the pages they worked hard on.Dionyseus01:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
I apologize for stepping over the line in this incident. The confrontation is hopefully over now (unless Dionyseus starts it again), and discussion is underway. —Philwelcht03:09, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onBrother_Cavil (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Philwelch (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 01:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:This is the second 3RR violation tonight for this Sysop. According to theAN/I report, he has engaged in edit warring tonight on several Battlestar Gallactica articles, and has apparently banned several users who are trying to protect the pages they worked hard on.Dionyseus01:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onScottish people (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).69.157.126.241 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 02:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:- the anon user keeps inserting POV and agenda-pushing edits against overwhelming consensus (evidenced on the talk page of the article concerned). Extreme patience has been shown over many days and user has been warned twice today by two different editors about 3RR, yet he still insists on reverting to his POV edits.--WilliamThweatt02:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
no and I don't know who that is, but you shouldn't go around labelling things on other users. Just because your own POV is responding to mine does not mean you did not break the rule or that your are not pushing your own agenda or POV onto me. Your own opinon hardly considered consenus. My name is James if you like to know and maybe I should make a user:page. Is it free to register? (that is, do I have to make a "donation"?)69.157.109.17003:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onMichael Graham (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).68.50.149.214 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 03:50, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: Article had Foundation issues in the past, requiring major rewrites on talk page that the IP did not approve of. Changes in tone need to be discussed on talk, and IP has not been receptive to the issues at hand. --badlydrawnjefftalk03:50, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onPROBLEM ARTICLE/PAGE NAME (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).VIOLATOR_USERNAME (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 03:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: This user reverted 12 times in 24 hours!
Comment: 3RR rule does not apply to overt vandalism.Netaji06:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment:: Actually, I just noticed that thisSyiem has NOT violated 3RR. There appears to be a campaign against him. Notice that all of his 12 edits were not reverts. This Zafarnamah bloke got theKhalistan article protected for vandalizing it with gibberish from some extremist orgs in the Khalsite diaspora that do not represent the mainstream view of the Khalsa Panth (or the facts, for that matter). I suggest to the investigating admin that he look into the matter with a grain of salt.Netaji07:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onUSSR_national_football_team (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Kwame_Nkrumah (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :[66]
Time report made: 16:59, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: Please see additional 3RR violation below. User has previously been warned of 3RR,[67], which he skirted using a now-defunct sock-puppet,[68]. User has been implicated by 4 admins and has been banned once,[69]. --Palffy16:59, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onThierry_Henry (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Kwame_Nkrumah (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :[71]
Time report made: 16:59, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: Please see additional 3RR violation above. User has previously been warned of 3RR,[72], which he skirted using a now-defunct sock-puppet,[73]. User has been implicated by 4 admins and has been banned once,[74]. --Palffy16:59, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onLeoben_Conoy (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Philwelch (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 06:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:Philwelch blocked me for reverting his redirects once from his other two 3RR violations I've reported tonight. He gave me no warning, he treated me as if I were a vandal.Dionyseus06:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onTerracotta Army (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).OrbitOne (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 13:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:In the interests of full disclosure, I point out that I am an admin and am involved in this dispute, and therefore recuse myself from taking any administrative action.
Also in the interests of full disclosure, I point out that I am also guilty of a 3RR violation on the same article, a fact I did not notice until I started compiling the information for this report. Mea culpa.
All the best.
ΞxtremeUnction|yakkity yak13:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onProtest Warrior (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).NBGPWS (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 04:19, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:This user made this account to troll theProtest Warrior article. One of his first edits was to try and "hide" in the protest sign section the Nazi saying "ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer!" He figured out he'd get instantly banned for continuous blatant vandalism, so has tried to subtly destroy the article from behind the scenes. This is just one example. For the fourth revert he once again tried to slip it under the radar by marking his revert - a whole section added - as "minor."--Neverborn04:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onAnn Coulter (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).172.191.168.138 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:37 UTC
Comments:Note this above are in UTC + 12 -GIen07:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onUser talk:Whatsupdoc.Whatsupdoc (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 09:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:This person has been banned as a sockpuppet ofUser:Johnski and has been banned under several diffrent accounts for violating Wikipedia rules. The user has now taken to blanking out their own user page and claiming they are someone else and trying to get unbanned. The comments on the talk page this person is blanking has not only to do with the arbitration caseJohnski/Proposed Arbitration Decision and threats made against me.
I am asking that he be prevented from blanking the comments on his user page and talk page.Davidpdx09:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Please disregard the complaint. Enough time has passed that things have calmed downDavidpdx10:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onTurkic peoples.Zaparojdik (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 14:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
This user has been unwilling to discuss changes to the article on the talk page and continously reverts both this article as well as the one onPan-Turkism. He also labels users who do not agree with his point of view as "vandals" and states that "Turks should always battle with Kurds and Armenians". He proclaimed on the talk page in reference to a map: "THIS MAP IS NOT RIGHT AT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" --Clevelander14:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onStar Trek XI.Jkress613 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 18:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: The user has reverted POV writing as well as misspellings into the film article more than three times, which is a 3RR violation.
Three revert rule violation onAlexander Cockburn (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).68.210.28.135 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 19:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: I believe this amounts to a violation of the 3RR. Basically, the editor made an uncommented deletion of a block of text that discussed criticism of the article subject. Multiple editors reverted this deletion, complaining in edit summaries that it was unexplained. The anon editor finally decided to make some case for his position, but still ended up deleting this text block for the fourth time today. Please advise if I should take this to AN/I instead of here. Cheers,DickClarkMises19:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onGolfers with most wins in men's major championships (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Stanley011 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 20:00, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:He refuses to actually discuss the concerns on the talk page, instead posting single comments and considering the matter "addressed".Aren't I Obscure?20:00, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
And of course, I have discussed all conerns, and continue to do so as an examination of the discussion page of the article will reveal. This user interprets disagreement as non-discussion.Stanley01101:07, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onRandy Orton (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Comiclover420 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 20:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:This is a clear violation of the rule, the user has been notified but has continued to revert, user has also been told where to go to see the discussion on why the list was removed but hasn't taken no notice of anything they have been told. User will continue to carry on unless action is taken.Lil crazy thing20:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onPeru (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views)
Time report made: 09:01, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onSnakes on a Plane (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Dposse (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 20:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onNorthern Ireland (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Setanta747 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 21:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: User Setanta747 has already broken 3RR on this article twice in the last week. Well aware of policy, can someone investigate?Djegan21:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
It says here "(Result: user blocked)" but this is not the case. They are not blocked. They have reverted the article three times today. Is their an admin in the house?Djegan05:59, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Voice of All added the "user blocked" result above but never blocked.[82]Give me a second to review the case.Prodegotalk21:26, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onNorthern Ireland (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Djegan (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 22:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: User Djegan has already broken 3RR on this article twice in the last week. Well aware of policy (as can be seen by the fact that he has also reported myself), can someone investigate? I notice he has claimed an anonymous IP is responsible for the last revert, though I obviously cannot be sure: this user has recruited help from other editors in an edit war against me, and is very obviously 'playing the game' with regard to the 3RR rule.
I remind that the 3RR Rule states:If you violate the three revert rule, after your fourth revert in 24 hours sysops may block you for up to 24 hours. In cases where multiple parties violate the rule, sysops should treat all sides equally.
I further note that I have tried to come to a compromise on several occasions - particularly on my lastedit, which might be regarded as an expansion or clarification rather then merely a simple revert. It was certainly an effort to reach consensus.
Djegan has asked for citations for my edits. I supplied them, yet this still is apparently not good enough for him --Mal22:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
This nomination is in bad faith and based on incorrect information...
In summary I do not edit by anon and do not revert war with myself. I think that Mals nomination is in bad faith as I already stated ontalk:Northern Ireland that I did not edit anonymously. He should of made it clear above that three reverts are under a user account and a fourth under an ip address. Additionally he states that I broke 3RR before, this is incorrect. Let him cite the occurences, its clear fromhis talk page that he does no understand 3RR.Djegan22:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Fair enough. Though I have not investigated your evidence, I will take you on face value Djegan. I was going to remove the '4th revert', though I thought perhaps it should be kept so that Admins can see exactly what we have been talking about here. I have put a note after it instead.
You are, however, still apparently guilty of breaking the 3RR rule (my opinion). --Mal22:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Just because someone has violated the three revert rule does not mean they will be blocked. It is up to the administrator's discretion whether to take action. Conversely, just because someone hasnot violated the 3RR does not mean that they will not be blocked. Revert warring is disruptive, and the 3RR is not an entitlement to three 'free' reverts per day.
Quoted fromWikipedia:Three-revert rule:
--Mal23:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onScorpio (astrology) (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).203.59.164.116 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 22:52, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onUnited_States_Senate_elections,_2006 (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).132.241.246.111 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 03:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
The edit the user made (and repeatedly reinserted after other editors removed it) was "Even [Jim] Talent's supporters think he's going to loose(sic)". A glance at the user'stalk page indicates that a) he's a suspected sock puppet, and b) he has a serious problem adhering toNPOV on political topics. An article likeUnited States Senate elections, 2006 is by nature in danger of being contaminated by POV material, and it's not good for an editor who cannot control his biases to be unable to resist infecting such articles. This editor has been repeatedly warned, and has not listened.VoiceOfReason03:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onAnarchism (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).DTC (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 06:58, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:Anarchism#Anarcho-capitalism is the problem area. Part of the long-standing edit-war between proponents of anarcho-capitalism versus everybody else. I proposed an agreement, to which the problem user seemed to agree but he keeps changing content in line with the proposal to content which denies that the view he edits in is that of a minority. This is a strange claim, against the grain of common knowledge and scholarship on the field, as well as pages upon pages of debate on the Talk page. Also, the problem user is suspected by some of being a sock puppet. --Marinus06:58, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
No 3RR violation from me. My edits were modifications and trying to conform to sources. On the other hand, "Good Intentions" has been edit warring and reverting.[83] It make no sense that he's accusing me of 3RR when he's beeng doing reverts and I haven't done any. The sockpuppet tag is just a method of harrassment.DTC07:23, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation on
 | It is suspected that this user might be asock puppet or impersonator ofRJII. Please refer tocontribution history matching RJII's edits and style for evidence.Seeblock log andcurrent autoblocks. |
DTC is whoever you want him to be.DTC19:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC).DTC (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 07:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: User removes sock-puppet suspicion tag from user page, though there are three editors who are willing to suspect him and independently tag him as such. --Marinus07:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
No 3RR violation from me. My edits were modifications and trying to conform to sources. On the other hand, "Good Intentions" has been edit warring and reverting.[84] It make no sense that he's accusing me of 3RR when he's beeng doing reverts and I haven't done any.DTC 07:23, 22 August 2006 (UTC) Oh I see, he tried to trap me with the sockpuppet tag thing. That tag amounts to vandalism by now. It's been up for a long time and he hasn't been able to prove that I am this mysterious person I am supposed to be.DTC 07:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Comment I've come to regret this report - it is his user-space, after all. What I hoped to accomplish was highlight this user's aggressiveness in advancing his views contrary to (attempted) consensus. --Marinus11:46, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onViking.Comanche_cph (talk •contribs •page moves •block user •block log): Five times in less than an hour, Comanche inserted some unsourced nonsense about mushrooms.
User has previously been blocked for edit warring on several occasions[85]. I'm not sure any new warnings are requisite.
Time report made: 14:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onAluminium (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Pfahlstrom (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 14:39, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: User keeps reverting page to include citation-needed tags for verified information (as per talk page). This encourages another user to vandalise the article by blanking the relevant sections altogether.
Three revert rule violation onCapitalism (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Lulu_of_the_Lotus-Eaters (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Comments: Aware of the 3RR rule, see the block log.Ultramarine16:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment: Notice that the "4th revert" is a completely unrelated edit to the first three (not even the same section of the article). After the first removal of material unrelated to the article, inserted by Ultramarine, I provided a detailed explanation on the talk page for why it was not relevant. She restored the non-relevant graph three times without providing any explanation of its alleged connection to the article in talk. However, rather than revert a fourth time, I sought the input from an administrator about Ultramarine's behavior in inserting irrelevant (and somewhat disruptive) material).LotLE×talk18:54, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Results: I only see a total of three reverts, not four. WhileWP:3RR isn't an entitlement to make 3 reverts a day, it appears the content is a dispute about a graph which has not gained consensus for inclusion on the article talk page anyway.--MONGO05:09, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onWorld Wrestling Entertainment (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).JB196 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 17:04, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: User is re-adding non-notable links that can easily be found elsewhere in problem article. Has been told to discuss the addition of these unnecessary links on the article's talk page, though he has shown no intention of a discussion as proven by his constant reversions. --3:1617:11, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onEiffel programming language (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Bertrand_Meyer (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 19:14, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
This user is Dr. Bertrand Meyer editing the page on the Eiffel programming language, which he invented. As a recognized expert in his field but new to Wikipedia he does not understand Wikipedia rules and believes he can impose his own. In this particular case he is trying to retroactively assert copyright over material he has already entered into Wikipedia so that he can remove it.
On the page forRandall James Bayer, has three times in 24-hours removed the list of his journal articles. Seehistory. This is a violation ofWikipedia:3RR.Wjhonson04:00, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
A total of three. Deletion counts as a revert.
Three revert rule violation onPakistani cricket team (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).AFRIDIA (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 15:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onCapitalism (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Lulu_of_the_Lotus-Eaters (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Note: This is a duplicate of the above false and rejected 3RR report by same user, using same diffs. The alleged 4th and 5th reverts listed are unrelated edits to different sections of the article. The first three are the same ones reported above, and I have madezero deletions of the inappropriate chart since 15:22, 22 August 2006 (though other editors have removed it since then). The diffs listed below Ultramarine's comment are all either identical to the diffs listed above, or diffs of non-consecutive edits (that also don't happen to have anything to do with the graph at question).LotLE×talk20:39, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: Aware of the 3RR rule, see the block log. I have reported the 4 first revert previously above but the 4th was considered dusbious. Howver, he has now made a 5th revert. This shows how he reverts to a prior version and deletes added text:
Ultramarine21:03, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onOverseas Chinese (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Edipedia (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Comments: User had been warned on previous occasions before:[110],[111]. And he has a habit of removing warnings on his Talk page. This is the most recent warning he received:[112].
Three revert rule violation onRobert Spencer (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Dy-no-miite (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Comments: 3RR violation on the introduction.
Three revert rule violation onCapitalism (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Ultramarine (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 20:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: Editor repeatedly adds irrelevant graph to article, despite 3RR warning and consensus of talk page against its inclusion. The latest reversion follows two false reports, above and using same diffs, of 3RR against me for removing the same original research material (Ultramarine reverts multiple editors for its inclusion, and refuses to present any argument for its relevance on talk; only that she believes it is "interesting").LotLE×talk
Three revert rule violation onJapanese war crimes (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).RevolverOcelotX (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 21:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Although the user didn't revert to the exact version listed above, the content he reverted was from that period. So he was effectively reverting.John Smith's21:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about this. I got confused and thought I had removed that article link only recently. Please close this report.John Smith's21:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onGermany_national_football_team (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).FoxyProxy (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :[122] - The 3RR warning was applied onUser: Kwame Nkrumah's page (see explanation below).
Time report made: 21:45, August 23, 2006 (UTC)
Comments: Please see additional recent 3RR violationshere. I have filed a checkuser request,[123] to determine for certain whether the person who has been reverting Germany National Football Team is the same person.Palffy21:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onUser:RSudarshan (edit | [[Talk:User:RSudarshan|talk]] |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).66.38.180.253 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 22:54, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onGermany national football team (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).1892_Fitch_Dude (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 23:07, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:No block. Not only was this report made 3 days after the reverts, but this is nowhere near four in 24 hours. If you want help in a low-intensity edit war, you may like to tryRequests for comment instead.Robdurbar06:47, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation on Several templates, claiming that Ukrainian copyright law is superceded by American copyright laws because images are released as fair use per Ukrainian laws. Here is an example atTemplate:FC Chornomorets Odessa. He has been blocked for 3RR prior elsewhere.Kwame Nkrumah (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 00:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
I'd support a block of some significant duration, should one be handed out, or would consider one myself. This user has exhibited a rather cavalier attitude to the counsel given him, and his current user page could be viewed as giving the appearance of trolling. He's been warned of his behaviour in the past. I highly doubt, with all due respect to Cowman109, that this user is simply misinformed, he has a tendency to apparently wikilawyer about anything and everything at the slightest provocation. ++Lar:t/c03:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onParis (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Hardouin (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 00:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:Repeat offender. Fully aware that he is beaking theWP:3RR rule. Simply reverts any edit not to his taste without the slightest attempt at discussion beforehand. Always the protagonist in any revert war, as a look at this article's (as well as others) page history will show.
Hardouin, no matter how 'right' you think you are, or 'wrong' the other editor appears to you, there is no justification for breaking the three revert rule. As you have been blocked on this article for breaking the rule numerous times before, I think a 48 hour block is appropriate.Robdurbar06:55, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
They seem to be repeatedly adding "desirable leafy green" to the description of the article onTeddington dozens of examples can be seenhere. The user may have a comercial interest in the change, butWP:AGF prevents that from being assumed. Despite changes by the rest of the regular editors of the page explaining the NPOV policy, it seems as though the IP block has not stopped making the same change for many days. This is not one of my main articles but reverting it has begun to become a problem for me as well. If someone could address the situation appropriatly, that'd help, thanks.i kan reed02:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onTemplate:FC Chornomorets Odessa (edit | [[Talk:Template:FC Chornomorets Odessa|talk]] |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Ryulong (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 00:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onProtest Warrior (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).NBGPWS (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 08:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: These reverts are only the latest to violate the rule, and the ones in the last 24 hours. This editor actually has about 7 reverts, maybe more, in the last 30 hours or so, but it was chosen not to file a report because of a combination of disagreement over the intent of the policy and my not being able to figure out the complaint format (i hope i got it right this time).User:NBGPWS is well aware of the policy, having been blocked under it in the past and warned repeatedly. User is also being considered for a block for incivility and trolling.TheKaplan08:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment - I believe he has the official template as he was blocked only 2 days ago for the same thing. Also, he created a sock puppet in order to appear not violate another 3RR (it was banned today). Here's theSock Puppet Case.--Tbeatty08:33, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onHuman rights in Israel (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Oiboy77 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 09:41, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:The history of Oiboy77's "contributions" to WP is an uninterrupted stream of POV pushing, intimidations, 3RR violations, fake signatures and plain vandalism. ←Humus sapiensну?09:41, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onNew anti-Semitism (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Netscott (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 16:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Reverting, in this context, meansundoing the actions of another editor or other editors in whole or part. It does not necessarily mean taking a previous version from history and editing that. A revert may involve as little as adding or deleting a few words or even one word (or punctuation mark). Even if you are making other changes at the same time, continually undoing other editors' work counts as reverting. "Complex partial reverts" refer to reverts that remove or re-add only some of the disputed material while adding new material at the same time, which is often done in an effort to disguise the reverting. This type of edit counts toward 3RR, regardless of the editor's intention.
Three revert rule violation onInflation (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).66.206.174.80 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 18:12, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: reverting in "inflation is a rise in the aggregate money supply", which is a fringe POV, discussed numerous times on the talk page but tennaciously edited in by individuals who hold the fringe POV.JBKramer18:12, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onJim Hoffman (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Bov (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 23:03, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onHomosexuality in ancient Greece (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Cretanpride (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 03:00, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
User:Cretanpride has been making disruptive edits toHomosexuality in ancient Greece and its talk page for at least a week, often using sockpuppets. OnTalk:Homosexuality in ancient Greece, a suspected sockpuppet ofUser:Cretanpride made the comment: "The article needs to be changed. I will NEVER stop arguing against this article until it is changed."
Three revert rule violation onBahá'í Faith (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).RoddyYoung (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 15:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onTalk:Hermeticism (edit | [[Talk:Talk:Hermeticism|talk]] |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Hanuman_Das (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 19:02, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
The issue is one of Hanuman not wanting a WikiProject tag on the page. Three revert rule warning is not of me warning him, but of him warning me after I reverted something else a mere 2 times, showing that he understood the rule enough to understand he was breaking it.KV(Talk)19:02, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onIran-Iraq War (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).TDC (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: (Marmoulak20:12, 25 August 2006 (UTC))
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onNew anti-Semitism (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Myung1 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 21:12, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onWii (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).TJ_Spyke (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 00:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Editor kept adding romourd launch games to this article arter I supplied an article in the talk page how the games he was adding were confermed NOT for launch but launch window, which is after the launch of the console. --DivineShadow21800:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onChild pornography (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Qwasty (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 04:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:General content dispute over a section. The other editor involved,User:DanB DanD did not recieve a warning until recently, and seems to have stopped reverting post-warning.User:Qwasty will give vandalism warnings for people who undo the reverts.
Three revert rule violation onWhite(people).Al-Andalus (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 24:11, 26 August 2006 (EST)
Comments:
The user has a history of breaking the three revert rule most recently that I can find on January 2nd of this year. The countries in the list he keeps adding have no sources. This was identified as unsourced over a week ago and a week was given to provide a source. Now that the unsourced countries are being removed, he keeps adding them back without an accompanying source.
Three revert rule violation onKola Boof.Day-Wo (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 07:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
User is attempting to revert the entire article (!) back to an previous version that was based entirely on press releases and unfounded statements. User has not responded toseveral attempts to get a dialogue going and seems to only wish for their (incredibly unfounded) contributions to make up the entire article. Has changed article headlines to things like "DON'T CALL HER A SEX SLAVE" (yes, all in caps). Does not seem to have any sort of grasp on what Wikipedia stives to accomplish.
Shamrox07:44, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks guys, will do.Shamrox09:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onPluto (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Ryulong (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 00:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Comment I have beeen involved in this dispute after seeing a report onWP:AIV. After warnings where both editors were on exactly 3 reverts apiece, the edit war stopped. I do not considerRyūlóng to have exceeded 3RR, but I caution both parties to avoid disruptive edit warring, and engage in constructive dilogue to move forward. --Cactus.man✍10:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment: Note that Nixer removed the original outcome of this case posted by Cactus.man.[155] -Tangotango10:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onKancha Ilaiah (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Holywarrior (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 00:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onCountry (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Huaiwei (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):[162]
Time report made: 16:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onRod D. Martin (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).69.15.59.130 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 00:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: It is hard to list his reverts, as he does them in groups instead of one big edit. Another editor is about to violate 3rr in this war also --Wildnox18:04, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onPluto (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Ryulong (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 19:09, 26 August 2006
Comments I already reported this user today but the admin decided not to block him. The user continues revert-warring reverting changes of other users to his own version.--Nixer19:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onHafele-Keating_experiment (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).84.253.151.77 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log)200.253.18.10 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 00:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:Each revert is divided into four subedits; the user has a set of dynamic IPs, some of which appear to be used by (presumably unrelated) vandals.
Three revert rule violation onGerman language (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).82.83.66.175 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 19:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:User uses various IPs but are clearly related, his entire IP range will probably have to be blocked.IP's encountered so far, all with 1 edit; on the same article and the exact same action and reponds to edit summaries directed at other IPs. :
Rex19:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Excellent thank you very much.Rex20:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onRobert Spencer (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Reza1 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
and a few more.
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 20:23, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:AWP:BLP.EricR20:23, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onKola Boof (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Day-Wo (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 20:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
As stated before...user is attempting to revert the entire article (!) back to an previous version that was based entirely on press releases and unfounded statements. User has not responded toseveral attempts to get a dialogue going and seems to only wish for their (incredibly unfounded) contributions to make up the entire article. Has changed article headlines to things like "DON'T CALL HER A SEX SLAVE" (yes, all in caps). Does not seem to have any sort of grasp on what Wikipedia stives to accomplish.
User has been warned several times by myself, another user and a moderator and will still not respond or discontinue with their vandalism.Shamrox20:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onGlobal_Positioning_System (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).84.253.151.77 (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 23:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:Each revert is divided into three subedits and the user has a set of dynamic IPs. Has been occurring for several days, way more than 3RR by now.Dual Freq23:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onRobert Spencer.Dy-no-miite (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 00:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: The user has now made another revert to this article.[166] He removed what we agreed upon on the talk page under the RfC section. --Reza121:15, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onBat Ye'orRobert Spencer.CltFn (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 00:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onRobert SpencerAnneCr (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 00:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: This user has few edits and may not be familiar with 3rr policy.BhaiSaabtalk01:33, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onRobert_Spencer.Example user (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
This user is simply bullying three different editors complaining that they will not accept user's unilateral changes, and ironically warning them about 3RR rule. This is simply someone taking over for a user banned for the same reverts. (see user talk from Reza1 to BhaiSaab asking for help). They are not answering any objections on the discussion page as to the relevance of the changes.
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 00:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: Actually I gave you a warning because you were reported for 3rr. See above.BhaiSaabtalk02:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments: The above user has been blockedtwice for 3RR.BakamanBakatalk15:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation onGosei Sentai Dairanger (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).KingConvoy (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Three revert rule warning diff frombefore this report was filed here (if applicable) :
Time report made: 00:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
Three revert rule violation onBackstreet Boys (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views).Pompertown (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log):
Time report made: 10:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments:User was not warned explicitly aout 3RR, but several messages asking him to stop and explain himself were placed on his talk page, and on the article's talk page. User also made personal attacks when reverting. +Fin -10:29, 27 August 2006 (UTC)