 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Wifredo Lam" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(December 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Wifredo Lam | |
|---|---|
 FromJosé Gómez-Sicre photographic archives | |
| Born | Wifredo Óscar de la Concepción Lam y Castilla December 8, 1902 (1902-12-08) Sagua La Grande, Cuba |
| Died | September 11, 1982 (1982-09-12) (aged 79) Paris, France |
| Known for | Painting |
| Notable work | The Jungle (1943),Museum of Modern Art collection. |
| Spouse(s) | Eva Piriz (1929–1931; her death) Helena Holzer (1944–1950) Lou Laurin (1960–1982; his death, 3 sons) |
| Children | 4 |
| Awards | Guggenheim International Award |
Wifredo Óscar de la Concepción Lam y Castilla (Chinese:林飛龍;Jyutping:lam4 fei1lung4; December 8, 1902 – September 11, 1982), better known asWifredo Lam, was a Cuban artist who sought to portray and revive the enduringAfro-Cuban spirit and culture.[1] Inspired by and in contact with some of the most renowned artists of the 20th century, includingPablo Picasso,Henri Matisse,Frida Kahlo andDiego Rivera, Lam melded his influences and created a unique style, which was ultimately characterized by the prominence of hybrid figures. This distinctive visual style of his also influenced many artists. Though he was predominantly a painter, he also worked with sculpture, ceramics and printmaking in his later life.
Wifredo Lam was born and raised inSagua La Grande, a village in the sugar farming province ofVilla Clara, Cuba. He was of mixed-race ancestry: his mother, the former Ana Serafina Castilla, was born to aCongolese former slave mother and a Cubanmulatto father and his father, Yam Lam, was a Chinese immigrant.[2] In Sagua La Grande, Lam was surrounded by many people of African descent; his family, like many others, practiced Catholicism alongside their African traditions. Through his godmother, Matonica Wilson, aSantería priestess locally celebrated as ahealer andsorceress, he was exposed to rites of the Africanorishas.[2] While Lam was never initiated intoSantería,Palo Monte, orAbakuá Secret Society, he was familiar with the practices, as cultural participation was widespread in Cuba.[3] His contact with African celebrations and spiritual practices proved to be his largest artistic influence.
Lam’s father, Enrique Lam-Yam, was a Chinese immigrant from Canton (Guangdong province) who came to Cuba as part of the late-19th-century wave of Chinese laborers and merchants. Enrique was in his fifties when Wifredo was born and remained an important presence in the family home in Sagua la Grande, a town with an active Chinese community.
Lam grew up surrounded by Chinese objects—porcelain, calligraphy, ornamental screens—that were common in Cuban-Chinese households. Scholars note that some of his later abstract, calligraphic lines and mask-like faces echo Chinese brushwork and scroll composition.
Though Lam never practiced Chinese religion, he absorbed a respect for ancestor veneration and an interest in hybrid spiritual systems. His later embrace of Afro-Cuban Santería and Taoist-like ideas of balance shows a comfort with syncretism that mirrors his mixed heritage.
Lam often spoke of being “a mulatto” of many worlds—African, Spanish, Chinese. His father’s Asian heritage helped form his lifelong fascination with mestizaje (cultural mixing), which became a key theme of his art.
In 1916, Lam moved toHavana to study law, a path that his family had thrust upon him. Simultaneously he also began studying tropical plants at the Botanical Gardens.[4] From 1918 to 1923, Lam studied painting at the Escuela de Bellas Artes. However, he disliked both academic teaching and painting. He left forMadrid, Spain, in the autumn of 1923 to further his art studies.
In 1923, Lam began studying in Madrid underFernando Álvarez de Sotomayor y Zaragoza, the curator of theMuseo del Prado and teacher ofSalvador Dalí. In the mornings he would attend his conservative teacher's studio, while he spent his evenings working alongside young, nonconformist painters. At the Prado, he discovered and was awed by the work ofHieronymus Bosch andPieter Bruegel I. While Lam's early paintings were in themodernist Spanish tradition, his work soon became more simplified and decorative.[2] Though his dislike for academic conservatism persisted, his time in Spain marked his technical development, in which he began to merge a primitive aesthetic and the traditions of Western composition. It was in Paris that Lam was exposed to conventions of African sculpture. In 1929, he married Eva Piriz, but both she and their young son died in 1931 oftuberculosis; it is likely that this personal tragedy contributed to the dark nature of his work.[5]
During the 1930s, Lam was exposed to a variety of influences. The influence ofSurrealism was discernible in his work, as well as that ofHenri Matisse.[2] Lam had begun to incorporate Surrealist techniques before his time in Europe, learning of artists like Matisse through publications and news from a friend.[6] Throughout Lam's travels through the Spanish countryside, he developed empathy for the Spanish peasants, whose troubles in some ways mirrored those of the former slaves he grew up around in Cuba.[7] At the outbreak of theSpanish Civil War, he sided with the Republicans in 1936–1937 and used his talent to fashion Republican posters and propaganda. Drafted to defend Madrid, Lam was incapacitated during the fighting in late 1937 and was sent toBarcelona. There he met Helena Holzer, a German researcher, and the Catalan artist known asManolo Hugué. Manolo gave Lam the letter of introduction that sparked his friendship withPicasso, whose artwork had impressed and inspired Lam a year before when he saw an exhibition in Madrid.[2]
In 1938, Lam moved to Paris. He quickly gained the support of Picasso, who introduced him to many of the leading artists of the time, such asFernand Léger,Henri Matisse,Georges Braque andJoan Miró. He also befriended the poetMary Stanley Low. In his trip to Mexico in the same year, Lam stayed withFrida Kahlo andDiego Rivera.[5]
Picasso also introduced him toPierre Loeb, a Parisian art dealer; Loeb gave Lam his first exhibition at the Galerie Pierre Loeb in 1939, which received an enthusiastic response from critics.[8] Picasso and Lam also exhibited their work together at the Perls Galleries in New York in the same year. Lam's work went from showing the influence of Matisse, seen in hisstill lifes, landscapes and simplified portraits, to being influenced byCubism.[2] Mainly working withgouache, Lam began producing stylized figures that appear to be influenced by Picasso. Much of his work in 1938 possessed emotional intensity; the subject matter ranged from interacting couples to women in despair and showed a considerably stronger African influence, seen in the figures' angular outlines and the synthesis of their bodies.[2]
While Lam began simplifying his forms before he came into contact with Picasso's work, it is apparent that Picasso had a significant impact on him. With regard to Picasso's exhibition, Lam said that it was "not only a revelation, but… a shock."[2] Lam gained the approval of Picasso, whose encouragement has been said to have led Lam to search for his own interpretation of modernism.[7]
With the outbreak ofWorld War II and the invasion of Paris by the Germans, Lam left forMarseille, France, in 1940. There he rejoined many intellectuals, including theSurrealists, with whom he had been associated since he metAndré Breton in 1939. While in Marseille, Lam and Breton collaborated on the publication of Breton's poemFata Morgana, which was illustrated by Lam. Though the drawings he created in Marseille between 1940 and 1941 are known as theFata Morgana suite, only about three inspired the illustrations for the poem.[2] In 1941, Breton, Lam andClaude Lévi-Strauss, accompanied by many others, left forMartinique, only to be imprisoned. After forty days, Lam was released and allowed to leave for Cuba, which he reached in midsummer 1941.
Upon his return toHavana, Lam developed a new awareness of Afro-Cuban traditions. He noticed that the descendants of the slaves were still being oppressed and that the Afro-Cuban culture was degraded and made picturesque for the sake of tourism. He believed that Cuba was in danger of losing its African heritage and therefore sought to free them from cultural subjugation. In an interview with Max-Pol Fouchet, he said:
"I wanted with all my heart to paint the drama of my country, but by thoroughly expressing the negro spirit, the beauty of the plastic art of the blacks. In this way I could act as aTrojan horse that would spew forth hallucinating figures with the power to surprise, to disturb the dreams of the exploiters."[7]
Additionally, his time in Cuba marked a rapid evolution of his style. Drawing from his study of tropical plants and familiarity with Afro-Cuban culture, his paintings became characterized by the presence of a hybrid figure—part human, part animal, and part vegetal.[2] His style was also distinctive because of its fusion of Surrealist and Cubist approaches with imagery and symbols from Santería.[9] In 1943, he began his best-known work,The Jungle. It reflected his mature style, depicting four figures with mask-like heads, half-emerging from dense tropical vegetation. Later that year it was shown in an exhibition at thePierre Matisse Gallery in New York, where it created controversy. The painting depicted the tension betweenModernism and the vibrancy and energy ofAfrican culture.[7]The Jungle was ultimately purchased by theMuseum of Modern Art in New York. It is often compared to Picasso'sGuernica, which is hung in the Museo Reina Sofía in Madrid.
Another work of Picasso's that has been compared toThe Jungle isLes Demoiselles d'Avignon.[10] Although these two paintings were created thirty-six years apart and have different cultural contexts, they both depict women in a sexualized context and both containprimitivist and Cubist elements in their designs.[10]
The combination of African ideas with a European style in Lam's work,The Jungle led to Lam and his second wife experiencing discrimination from the largely nonwhite Cuban population. Upon his return to Cuba, Lam moved away from the cosmopolitan art community and experimented more with Cubanavant-garde styles. Cuban artists have accused Lam of being an impostor when it comes to his artwork and his identity as a Cuban.
Lam continued to simplify and synthesize abstraction yet continued painting figurally; he also kept on developing themythology andtotemism that defined his style.[8] In 1944, he married Helana Holzer, whom he divorced in 1950. In 1946, he and Breton spent four months inHaiti. There Lam enriched his already extensive understanding and knowledge of African divinity and magic rituals through observingVoodoun ceremonies, although he later said that his contact with the African spirituality that he found throughout the Americas did not directly impact his formal style. African poetry, on the other hand, was said to have had a broadening effect on his paintings.[7] In 1950, he worked withRené Portocarrero and others; in the village of Santiago de Las Vegas, the group of painters worked on ceramic.[11] Lam settled in Paris in 1952 after having divided his time between Cuba, New York, and France.
Lam, who continued to sympathize with the common man, exhibited a series of paintings atHavana University in 1955 to demonstrate his support for the students' protests against Batista's dictatorship. Similarly, in 1965, six years after the revolution, he showed his loyalty to Castro and his goals of social and economic equality by paintingEl Tercer Mundo (The Third World) for the presidential palace. In 1960, Lam established a studio inAlbissola Marina on Italy's northwest coast and settled there with his wife Lou Laurin, a Swedish painter, and their three sons. In 1964, he was awarded the Guggenheim International Award and between 1966 and 1967 there were many retrospectives of his work throughout Europe. At the encouragement ofAsger Jorn and after being intrigued by the local pottery-making, Lam began to experiment with ceramics and had his first ceramic exhibition in 1975. He progressed to model sculptures and cast in metal in his twilight years, often depicting personages similar to those he had painted.
Wifredo Lam died on September 11, 1982, in Paris, aged 79. Having had more than one hundred personal exhibitions around the world, Lam had a well established reputation by the time of his death.
Lam, like many of the most renowned artists of the 20th century, combined radical modern styles with the "primitive" arts of the Americas.[9] WhileDiego Rivera andJoaquín Torres García drew inspiration fromPre-Columbian art, Lam was influenced by the Afro-Cubans of that time. He dramatically synthesized the Surrealist and Cubist strategies while incorporating the iconography and spirit of Afro-Cuban religion. For that reason, his work does not belong to any particular art movement.[2]
He held the belief that society focused too much on the individual and sought to show humanity as a whole in his artwork.[2] He painted generic figures, creating the universal. To further his goal, he often paintedmask-like faces. While Cuban culture and mythology permeated his work, it dealt with the nature of man and therefore was wholly relatable to non-Cubans.
Opened in 1983, the Wifredo Lam Center for Contemporary Art (in Spanish: Centro de Arte Contemporáneo Wifredo Lam) is a state-run gallery in tribute to Lam and located in Havana, Cuba.[12] This art gallery is responsible for the organization of the Bienal de la Habana, Cuba, a permanent art collection of approx. 1000 works, and research and study of contemporary visual arts in developing countries.[12][13]
In 2015, a retrospective exhibition of his works opened at theCentre Georges Pompidou in Paris, set to travel to theReina Sofia Museum in Spain and theTate Museum in London afterwards.[14]
In 2019, his work was included in the group showThe Gift of Art, atPérez Art Museum Miami. The exhibition highlighted important artworks within PAMM's permanent collection onLatinx andLatin American artists. Among the artists featured in the exhibition wereJosé Bedia (Cuba),Teresa Margolles (Mexico),Roberto Matta (Chile),Oscar Murillo (Colombia),Amelia Peláez (Cuba),Zilia Sánchez (Cuba), Tunga (Brazil), andCarmen Herrera (Cuba).[15]
The Jungle, which is considered Lam's masterpiece, is exemplary of the artist's mature style. The polymorphism, for which Lam is well known, juxtaposes aspects of humans, animals, and plants, creating monstrous, hybrid creatures. This merging of human, animal, and plant forms is described as magical metamorphosis.[5] Scholars have hypothesized that these figures originated from Lam's subconscious, connecting the artwork to Surrealist principles.[16] The dense composition creates a claustrophobic feeling while the forms remain difficult to differentiate. Scholars attribute this abstract construction of figures to the Cubist art style.[16]
The four figures' elongated limbs lack definition, while much emphasis is placed on body parts, such as their large feet, round buttocks and breasts, and images under two of the figures' mouths that Adrían claims resemble male genitalia.[16][10] There are also African-inspired masked heads; scholars report that Lam was interested the carvings on African masks.[16] Additionally, the iridescent quality of the forms enhances the painting's tropical feeling. The imagery of the tropics is also suggested with the densely packed cane stalks and palm leaves that merge with the figures, mirroring cosmological concepts fromAfro-Cuban religions where deities that inhabit elements in nature.[6] The sugarcane in the painting is suggested to allude to the fields in which African slaves owned by the Spanish and Portuguese worked.[16] The figure on the far right holding the shears is thought to be harvesting the sugarcane and figure on the far left resembles a horse and is suspected to represent a figure from Afro-Cuban mythology.[16] Although the sugarcane provides some potential context to the artwork, there is no specific geographic location whereThe Jungle is supposed to occur.[10] Scholars suggest that this lack of specificity makes orients the artwork towards a more universal audience.[10]
The somber palette containing a mixture of blue, green, yellow, and white suggests a hidden moonlit scene, perhaps a reference to the secret practice of African religions among enslaved peoples.[16][17] The usage of color inThe Jungle can also be viewed as occurring during the day in depths of a jungle.[16] Furthermore, historians suggest that the usage of red and orange in the color palette represent blood.[10]
The Jungle was not, however, intended to describe the primitivism of Cuba. Rather, Lam's intention was to depict a spiritual state—which is surely inspired bySantería;[18] he sheds light on the absurdity that has become Afro-Cuban culture and more specifically on the way Afro-Cuban traditions were cheapened for tourism. Specifically, Caribbean and Atlantic studies scholar Francisco-J. Hernández Adrián suggests thatThe Jungle serves as a critique of the exoticizing lens placed on the Atlantic as a byproduct of the colonial era.[10] He sought to describe the reality of the Afro-Cuban experience of his time and gained acclaim and fame for doing so.[16][10] The artwork is suggested to have challenged the colonial viewpoint.[10] Furthermore, Hernández Adrián claims that the imagery of the artwork reflects the constant struggles black people faced in Cuban society.[10] Specifically, one of the central struggles in the artwork is the slave labor suggested by the sugar cane inThe Jungle.[19] Art historian Doris Maria-Reina Bravo argues that the intensive labor in which many had to participate in Cuba as suggested by the artwork strongly differs from the way tourists viewed Cuba.[19] She claims that during the time of the artwork's creation, tourists viewed Cuba as a "playground".[19]
On December 6, 2017, Sotheby's sold Lam'sA Trois Centimetres de la Terre (1962) for €4.44m ($5.24m), which established a new record price for the painter. The work was sold as part of the Alain and Candice Fraiberger collection.[20] The previous record for the artist was set in May 2012, whenIdolo (Oya/Divinit de l'air de la mort) sold for $4.56m. A new record was established on June 28, 2020, when Sotheby's auctioned Lam's "Omi Obini" for $9,603,800.
| This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.(December 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
