 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "West Side Stadium" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(November 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
 Interactive map of West Side Stadium | |
| Former names | New York Sports and Convention Center |
|---|---|
| Location | West Side,Manhattan,New York City |
| Coordinates | 40°45′17″N74°00′15″W / 40.754749°N 74.004082°W /40.754749; -74.004082 |
| Owner | New York State |
| Capacity | 75,000 (85,000 for Olympics) |
| Construction | |
| Built | Never Broke Ground |
| Opened | Planned for 2008 |
| Construction cost | Over $1 billion |
| Architect | Kohn Pedersen Fox |
| Tenants | |
| New York Jets | |
West Side Stadium (also known as theNew York Sports and Convention Center) was a proposedfootball and Olympicstadium to be built on a platform overthe rail yards on theWest Side ofManhattan inNew York City.[1]
The stadium would have been an all-weather facility with aretractable roof, allowing it to be used as either a 200,000-square-foot (18,600 m2) indoor convention hall, or an 85,000-seat (75,000 post-Olympics) indoor-outdoor sporting event stadium. It was to be the new home for theNew York Jets of theNational Football League (NFL), who at the time of the proposal played atGiants Stadium inEast Rutherford, New Jersey, and were junior tenants to theNew York Giants. The stadium was to have served as the centerpiece ofNew York City's bid for the 2012 Summer Olympics, but, after heated debate, the proposal was defeated a month before theInternational Olympic Committee was to make its decision.
In the football off-season the building would have been used as an adjunct to theJacob K. Javits Convention Center for conventions and as a replacement forMadison Square Garden. It was promoted by then New York GovernorGeorge Pataki, New York City MayorMichael Bloomberg, and CongressmanCharles Rangel, but opposed by most of the local elected officials representing the area. The centerpiece of the city's bid for the2012 Summer Olympics, the stadium would have been part of a larger project torevitalize a long-underdeveloped area, including expansions of the Javits Center and theNew York City Subway's7 service. It was going to hostSuper Bowl XLIV in 2010 along with a college bowl game with a Big East team to be known as the Big Apple Bowl.[2][3] It is now part of the site of theHudson Yards development.
Before there were plans to construct the football stadium on the site, there had been long series of proposals to develop theair rights above the rail yards on the West Side of Manhattan. These included a major expansion ofMidtown Manhattan byWilliam Zeckendorf in the 1950s,[4] a housing development considered byU.S. Steel in the 1960s,[5] a possible relocation ofMadison Square Garden in the mid-1980s,[6] and a possible location for aNew York Yankees stadium in the 1990s.[7] Plans for a football stadium on the site first surfaced in 1999.[8] When the rail yards were reconstructed as theWest Side Yard in the 1980s, the facility was designed with space left between the tracks for columns to support development in the air rights above the tracks and allow for construction without interrupting use of the rail yard.[9]
The stadium proved highly controversial because it would have been a major construction project requiringpublic financing. Though many of its opponents supported the larger West Side development program, they questioned the economic benefit of a stadium that would have spent much of its time unused, as well as the general premise of subsidizing a football team that generates hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue for a private owner. Opponents felt that the budget could be better spent on mixed-use facilities. Supporters of the stadium said the cost to the city (over $1 billion) was an investment and would create thousands of jobs and billions in commercial revenue for the area, perhaps leading to increased tax revenue that could be used for vital infrastructure.
The rail yards were owned by theMetropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), which originally negotiated privately with the Jets without seeking other possible buyers. After Cablevision presented a rival proposal for West Side development without a stadium, public sentiment against an apparentno-bid contract for the Jets prompted the MTA to establish an open bidding process for the site. There were three bids, from the Jets, fromCablevision and fromTransgas, a power company.[10][11] On March 31, 2005, the MTA board voted to accept the bid from the Jets, even though the Cablevision offer included more cash up front. Attorneys for Cablevision announced that they would file suit to challenge the decision, and many other media outlets lambasted the MTA's decision as simply doing Governor Pataki's bidding rather than accepting a plan that would best serve the public.[12]
Public opinion was mixed. Some citizens of New York andNew Jersey were in favor of the stadium because they wanted the2012 Summer Olympics to be held in New York City. In order to host the Olympics, cities typically must build modern stadiums and prove to theInternational Olympic Committee that they have the resources to support the event.
Many Manhattan and West Side residents did not want the inconvenience, traffic congestion and resource drain that they believed the Olympics would bring to the already overcrowded city. TheNew York Daily News reported that 59% of New Yorkers were not in favor of holding the Olympics in New York at all. In December 2004, the commuter advocacy groupsStraphangers Campaign andTri-State Transportation Campaign filed a lawsuit that challenged the city's estimate that 70% of stadium patrons would use mass transit or arrive on foot instead of driving.[13] Many Jets fans wanted the stadium built, no matter what the cost.
The stadium was also notably opposed byCablevision, the sixth-largest cable television company in the United States and the then-owner ofMadison Square Garden (MSG)—home to theNew York Knicks andNew York Rangers—and theMSG Network, which broadcasts most of those teams' games. Although MSG was initially a prospective partner in the project,[14][15] it eventually concluded that the design was unworkable for their needs. After MSG dropped out, the city and state decided to proceed anyway.[16] The decision to place a new sports and concert venue in such close proximity to MSG, where it would hamper the older venue's ability to secure concerts and other events, made Cablevision oppose the plan. Cablevision responded with an expensive advertising campaign and large lobbying budget and made a $600 million offer to redevelop the stadium site for housing and office space instead of a stadium, and they initiated another lawsuit alleging that the city's environmental study was inaccurate.
Cablevision's stance against the stadium proposal was cited as "a factor"[17] in theNFL moving its2005 draft away from Cablevision-ownedTheater at Madison Square Garden to theJacob K. Javits Convention Center, ending a 10-year run of the event at MSG.[18] (The NFL moved the Draft to another Cablevision-controlled property,Radio City Music Hall, in 2006, but the league eventually began to award the event to other cities as a three-day spring event, due to growing popularity that New York's venues could not easily accommodate.)
The controversy spawned a political ad war on local television, with rival campaigns financed by the owners of the Jets and Cablevision. Proponents of the stadium said that the opposition ran deceptive television and radio ads claiming that a large multi-organizational coalition opposes the stadium, while many of these ads were funded by Cablevision. Cablevision said that it was presenting arguments other groups had actually made and that it was within its legal rights in refusing to run advertisements supportive of the stadium on its local cable systems, while running many ads critical of it.[19][20]
The stadium issue was also a political issue, as 2005 was an election year. Some individuals, most notably mayoral candidateAnthony Weiner, suggested another location inQueens, which has large open spaces and was home to other sports facilities such asShea Stadium (former home of theNew York Mets and Jets), as a possible alternative site for a stadium. The Jets ownership, however, said that any site other than the West Side would be no better than remaining in New Jersey.
Two components of the stadium plan ($300 million in state funding and the MTA's transfer of the land) were subject to the approval of thestate's Public Authorities Control Board. The Board's approval could be given only on a unanimous vote of its three members, who were representatives ofNew York State Assembly SpeakerSheldon Silver,New York State Senate Majority LeaderJoseph Bruno, and Pataki. On June 6, 2005, although Pataki's representative voted in favor, Silver and Bruno directed their representatives to abstain on the vote, thus denying the needed approval and scuttling the proposal. Silver, in particular, had vehemently opposed the project, saying it would divert money needed to rebuildLower Manhattan in the wake of theSeptember 11 attacks.[20] Asked if the stadium was dead, Silver answered, "It was never alive."[21]
Also on June 6, the International Olympic Committee released an evaluation of each city's bid, in which it noted that the New York City bid could not guarantee that the stadium would be available.[20] With the defeat of the West Side Stadium plan, Mayor Bloomberg and the New York 2012 campaign shifted their focus to the construction of a newMets ballpark,Citi Field, as the centerpiece to the Olympic bid, but the 2012 games were eventually awarded toLondon.[22]
In reaction to the state representatives' decision to reject the stadium's funding, the NFL decided on August 11 to reopen the bidding for the game site ofSuper Bowl XLIV. The eventual winner wasSun Life Stadium. The proposed college football bowl game (now called thePinstripe Bowl) is played annually atYankee Stadium starting in December 2010.[23]
After the West Side Stadium proposal was rejected, the Jets entered into a 50/50 partnership with the Giants to build a new stadium in East Rutherford to replace Giants Stadium. New Meadowlands Stadium (nowMetLife Stadium) opened in 2010 and hostedSuper Bowl XLVIII in 2014.
The site that the stadium would have been built on was rezoned to accommodate residential and commercial development in 2009.[24] The site was being proposed to be a 1,750 roomintegrated resort andcasino byWynn Resorts. The hotel would have been 1,189 feet tall and would have been 80 floors, making it one of thelargest hotels in New York City if it was built.[25] Wynn Resorts withdrew their bid in May of 2025.[26][27]
The controversy surrounding the proposed stadium was the subject of a film titled "A Stadium Story: The Battle for New York's Last Frontier" that premiered at the 2006Tribeca Film Festival. Directed by Benjamin Rosen and Jevon Roush, two childhood friends that grew up in Lower Manhattan, the film included footage of interviews, meetings and rallies for the campaigns being led in support of and opposed to the stadium. Rosen got the idea to create the film in 2004 during a conversation with fellow filmmakerMarc Levin, as Levin's office looked out onto the site of the proposed stadium.[28][29][30]
Sports venues in theNew York metropolitan area | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active |         | ||||||||||||||
| Defunct |
| ||||||||||||||
| Under construction | |||||||||||||||
| Never built | |||||||||||||||