Thewedding at Cana (also called themarriage at Cana,wedding feast at Cana ormarriage feast at Cana) is a story in theGospel of John at which the firstmiracle attributed to Jesus takes place.[1][2]
In the Gospel account,Jesus,his mother and hisdisciples are invited to a wedding atCana inGalilee. When his mother notices that the wine (Ancient Greek:οἶνος) has run out, Jesus delivers a sign of hisdivinity by turning water into wine at her request. The location of Cana has been subject to debate among biblical scholars and archaeologists. Several villages in Galilee are possible candidates as the original location of the wedding.
The account is taken as evidence of Jesus' approval of marriage and earthly celebrations. It has been used as an argument againstteetotalism.
The second chapter of theGospel of John states that Jesus was at a wedding (Ancient Greek:γάμος) in Cana with his disciples.[a] Jesus' mother (unnamed in the Gospel of John) told Jesus, "They have no wine," and Jesus replied, "Woman, what concern is that to you and to me? My hour has not yet come." His mother then said to the servants, "Do whatever he tells you".[b] Jesus ordered the servants to fill containers with water and to draw out some and take it to the chiefsteward (household official, master of the feast). After tasting it, without knowing where it came from, the steward remarked to thebridegroom that he had departed from the custom of serving the best wine first by serving it last.[c] John adds that: "Jesus did this, the first of his signs, in Cana of Galilee, and it revealed his glory; and his disciples believed in him".[d]
The Wedding Feast takes place in Cana shortly after the call ofPhilip andNathanael. According toJohn 21:2,[e] Cana was Nathanael's hometown.[3]
Although none of thesynoptic Gospels mentions the wedding at Cana,Christian tradition based on John 2:11[f] holds that this is the first public miracle of Jesus.[4] It is considered to have symbolic importance as the first of theseven signs in the Gospel of John by which Jesus' divine status is attested, and around which the gospel is structured. Jesus will later return to Cana, whereJohn 4:46–54[g] describes him healing a Capernaum official's young son; the second sign in the Gospel of John.[3]
The story has had considerable importance in the development of Roman Catholic theology. BishopFulton J. Sheen thought that it is very likely that it was one of Mary's relatives who was being married. This would mean Mary and her relatives would be embarrassed if they appeared inhospitable by running out of wine, giving Mary a reason to ask Jesus to intervene. Sheen further suggests that as Jesus arrived with additional guests, they may have contributed to the wines running short.[5] When his mother advises Jesus that their hosts are running out of wine, he says "Woman, what has this to do with me?" Sheen sees an echo of theProtevangelium of Genesis 3:15 "I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers",[h] marking the commencement of Jesus' redemptive ministry.[5] Jesus will again address her as "Woman" inJohn 19:26,[i] when he entrusts his mother to his disciple John, "Woman, behold, your son."[3]
The gospel account of Jesus being invited to a wedding, attending, and using his divine power to save the celebrations from disaster are taken as evidence of his approval for marriage and earthly celebrations. It has also been used as an argument against theteetotalism practiced among certain Protestant Christian denominations.[6]
Interpreted allegorically, the good news and hope implied by the story are in the words of the steward of the Feast when he tasted the good wine, "Everyone serves the good wine first, and then the inferior wine after the guests have become drunk. But you have kept the good wine until now" (John 2:10).[j] This could be interpreted by saying simply that it is always darkest before the dawn, but good things are on the way. The more usual interpretation, however, is that this is a reference to the appearance of Jesus, whom the author of the Fourth Gospel regards as being himself "the good wine".[7] According to Bill Day, the miracle may also be interpreted as theantitype ofMoses' first public miracle ofchanging water (the Nile river) into blood. This would establish a symbolic link between Moses as the first saviour of the Jews through their escape fromEgypt and Jesus as the spiritual saviour of all people.[8]
StudyingJesus in comparative mythology, the story of the transformation of water into wine bears some resemblance to a number of stories that were told about the ancient Greek godDionysus, who among others was said to fill with wine the empty barrels that had been left locked inside a temple overnight.[16] However, scholars generally agree that the Gospel of John was writtenby a community ofJewish Christians who had recently beenexcommunicated by the local synagogue for recognizing Jesusas the Messiah, leading some to conclude that it would be making it unlikely the possibility that the Gospel was influenced by ancientGreek mythology.[17]Bart Ehrman argues that the idea that the image of Jesus was influenced by ancientpagan mythology is usually dismissed by scholars as afringe theory.[18]
The view of the valley looking out towardsNazareth, fromKhirbet Qana, would have predominantly been of grape vines, as archeologists have found evidence of 1st-centurywine production.[19] The early 6th-century writerAntoninus Placentinus observed about Nazareth in his day: "it excels in wine and oil, fruits and honey."[20] So, if a miracle of turning water into wine had actually occurred at the site, it would likely have hadallegorical significance for observers familiar with Greek mythology.
The German theologianFriedrich Justus Knecht points out three lessons that are to be drawn from this account at Cana:[21]
The power of Mary's intercession. This first miracle, which confirmed the faith of our Lord's disciples, was wrought at Mary's intercession, for it was by her persuasion that He first manifested His glory by a striking miracle at Cana instead of at Jerusalem. Let us contemplate Mary's compassion on the distress of the poor bride and bridegroom, her living faith in the omnipotence of Jesus, and her confidence in His goodness.
Matrimony. By His presence at the marriage-feast of Cana Jesus honoured and sanctified marriage, which had already been instituted in Paradise.
Lawful pleasures. The fact of our Lord taking part in the marriage-feast teaches us that it is lawful and pleasing to God that we should take part in innocent recreations and harmless pleasures, rejoicing with those who rejoice.
The exact location of "Cana in Galilee" (Ancient Greek:Κανὰ τῆς Γαλιλαίας,Kana tēs Galilaias) has been subject to debate among scholars.[22] Modern scholars[who?] maintain that since the Gospel of John was addressed toJewish Christians of the time, it is unlikely that the evangelist would mention a place that did not exist.[citation needed] However,Dominican scholarJerome Murphy-O'Connor cautions that Cana is a very common name, with no known text offering any clue as to which of the dozen towns going by the name would be the correct one, and calls the common choice of Kafr Qanna near Nazareth "probably just a pious guess".[23]
The main candidates for the town from the Gospel of John are:
Kafr Kanna, inGalilee, locally identified at least since the 8th century with the biblical location;[24]
Qana, southern Lebanon,[23] in an area that was part of historical Galilee.
According to theCatholic Encyclopedia of 1914, a tradition dating back to the 8th century identifies Cana with the modern Arab town of Kafr Kanna, in Galilee, about 7 km (4.3 mi) northeast ofNazareth,[26] in today'sIsrael.
The ruined village of Khirbet Qana (Kanet el-Jelil), about six miles (9.7 km) further north,[27] is an option presented as certain byWilliam F. Albright in 1923,[28] whose name "Qana" is also etymologically closer to Cana than "Kanna".[24]
Some Lebanese Christians, especially theLebanese Melkites (Greek Catholics), supported by their Church, believe the southern Lebanese village of Qana to have been the actual location of this event.[23]
The spring of 'Ain Kanah ("Kanah Spring") near the village ofReineh, immediately northeast of Nazareth, has been proposed as an equally likely site byConder in 1878,[29] but has little going for it and has been rejected in more recent scholarship as a candidate.[25]
Jewish purification used water in stone jars to remain pure more easily than in clay jars (Leviticus 6:28 and Leviticus 11:33-34). Many throughout history have sought to recover the lost jars. On 21 December 2004, archaeologists reported finding in Kafr Kanna "pieces of large stone jars of the type theGospel says Jesus used when he turned water into wine".[30] But American scientists excavating the rival site of Khirbet Qana north of it, also claimed to have found pieces of stone jars from the time of Jesus.[30] Fellow archaeologistShimon Gibson cast doubt on the value of such finds for identifying the town meant by John, since such vessels are not rare and it would be impossible to link a particular set of vessels to the miracle.[30] "Just the existence of stone vessels is not enough to prove that this is a biblical site."[30] Several stone jars of the type described by the Gospel of John were found for instance inJerusalem: "At least six of them stood in the basement kitchen of the [1st-century CE] 'Burnt house'. They were shaped and finished on a very big lathe, given a pedestal foot and simple decoration. Such stone jars would hold large quantities of water for washing and kitchen needs. Flat discs of stone served as lids. The jars at Cana may have been similar to these", wroteAlan Millard.[31]
In the journalBiblical Archaeology Review,Michael Homan argued that biblical scholars had misinterpreted early texts, translating to 'wine' when the more sensible translation would have been 'beer'.[32] However, this has been dismissed by other writers, who pointed out that the Greekoinos always means wine, and that the wordsikera was available if the gospel author wanted to refer to barley beer.[33][34][35]
The Coptic Orthodox Church, alone among the apostolic churches, teaches that the wine was non-alcoholic.[36] However, the second century Coptic SaintClement of Alexandria would appear to indicate the opposite when he states that, although the Lord approved of drinking wine, he did not approve of drunkenness.[37]
In the 2019-presentAngel Studios TV series,The Chosen, Season 2 episode,The Wedding Gift, the day of the wedding is portrayed accurately from the Bible's New Testament, withJonathan Roumie providing the portrayal ofJesus.
^Ward, Bernard (1908)."Cana" . In Herbermann, Charles (ed.).Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 3. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
^Ward, Bernard (1908)."Cana".Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Co. Retrieved16 July 2021 – via Catholic Answers.
^Albright, W. F. (October 1923). "Some Archaeological and Topographical Results of a Trip through Palestine".Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research.11 (11). The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The American Schools of Oriental Research: 3–14 (see p.11).doi:10.2307/1354763.JSTOR1354763.S2CID163409706.