Wave elections in theUnited States are elections in which apolitical party makes major gains. Based on the "red states and blue states" color coding convention in use since 2000, wave elections have often been described as either "blue waves" or "red waves" depending on which party makes significant gains, referring to a major increase in seats held by either theDemocratic Party (associated with blue) in the former, or theRepublican Party (associated with red) in the latter.
Wave elections usually happen duringmidterm elections.[1] There is no consensus definition of what level of gains is necessary to constitute a wave election,[2][3][4]but the most recent midterm election year widely described as a wave election was2018's blue wave, where the Democratic Partyregained control of the House of Representatives and made anet gain of 7 seats in gubernatorial elections.[5][6]
Political analystCharlie Cook describes wave elections as the result of an "overarching, nationwide dynamic," such as a high or lowpresidential approval rating, economic conditions, andscandals.[7][8] Cook contrasts wave elections with "micro-elections" in which neither party makes significant gains, and candidates, local issues, and other factors not strictly related to party alignment have a stronger role than in wave elections.[7] Although several wave elections may occur in a row, wave elections are usually considered to be the exception rather than the norm.[8] A pick-up of 20 seats in theUnited States House of Representatives has been used as a cut-off point by analysts such asStuart Rothenberg.[9][10][11] However, political scientist Dan Hopkins has argued that the term has little utility in understanding elections and that there is no clear cut-off point between a wave election and other elections.[12]
Congressionalincumbents in the United States enjoy an electoral advantage over challengers, but a wave election often boosts challengers, resulting in many more incumbents losing than usual during wave elections.[2] A wave election can put into play seats that would otherwise be considered safe for the party holding the seat, and help even flawed challengers defeat incumbents.[2][9] Since at least 1954, wave elections have always benefited one party at the expense of the other, but the term has also been used to describe a hypothetical scenario in which numerous incumbents from both parties lose their seats.[2][8] The first election afterredistricting is often a wave election, since many incumbents are less firmly rooted in their districts following redistricting, and many other incumbents retire or suffer primary defeats.[2]
A wave election may also be concurrent with alandslide election, a term which usually refers to decisive victories in presidentialcontests. Many wave elections occur duringmidterm elections, with the party out of power picking up seats.[1] A common pattern involves a party with a victorious presidential candidate benefiting from a wave election, followed by the opposing party winning a wave election in the next midterm election.[9] Such occurred in 2008, with theelection ofBarack Obama as President, followed by the Republican wave of2010.
