| Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued October 1, 2007 Decided March 18, 2008 | |
| Full case name | Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party |
| Citations | 552U.S.442 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Washington's top-two primary system does not infringe upon smaller political parties' associational rights. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito |
| Concurrence | Roberts, joined by Alito |
| Dissent | Scalia, joined by Kennedy |
Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party, 552 U.S. 442 (2008), was aUnited States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Washington's top-two primary system does not infringe upon smaller political parties' associational rights.[1][2]
 | This article related to a case of theSupreme Court of the United States of theRoberts Court is astub. You can help Wikipedia byexpanding it. |