Bagehot was born inLangport,Somerset,England, on 3 February 1826. His father, Thomas Watson Bagehot, was managing director and vice-chairman ofStuckey's Bank. He attendedUniversity College London (UCL), where he studied mathematics and, in 1848, earned a master's degree in moral philosophy.[2] Bagehot wascalled to the bar byLincoln's Inn, but preferred to join his father in 1852 in his family's shipping and banking business.
In 1858, Bagehot married Elizabeth (Eliza) Wilson (1832–1921), whose father,James Wilson, was the founder and owner ofThe Economist. The couple were happily married until Bagehot's untimely death at age 51, but had no children.[3] A collection of their love-letters was published in 1933.[4]
In 1855, Bagehot founded theNational Review with his friendRichard Holt Hutton.[5][6] In 1861, he became editor-in-chief ofThe Economist. In the 16 years he served as its editor, Bagehot expanded the reporting of politics byThe Economist, and increased its influence among policy-makers. He was widely accepted by the British establishment and was elected to theAthenaeum in 1875.[7]
He considered himself a "conservative Liberal or 'between size in politics.'"[8]
Bagehot also wrotePhysics and Politics (1872),[10] in which he examines how civilisations sustain themselves, arguing that, in their earliest phase, civilisations are very much in opposition to the values of modern liberalism, insofar as they are sustained by conformism and military success but, once they are secured, it is possible for them to mature into systems which allow for greater diversity and freedom.
His viewpoint was based on his distinction between the qualities of an "accomplished man" and those of a "rude man", which he considered to be the result of iterative inheritances by which the "nervous organisation" of the individual became increasingly refined down through the generations.[11] He regarded that distinction as a moral achievement whereby, through the actions of the will, the "accomplished" elite was able to morally differentiate themselves from "rude men" by a "hereditary drill". He equally applied such reasoning to develop a form ofpseudoscientificracism, whereby those ofmixed race lacked any "inherited creed" or "fixed traditional sentiments" upon which, he considered, human nature depended.
He attempted to provide empirical support for his views by citingJohn Lubbock andEdward Tylor although, in their writings onhuman evolution, neither of them accepted arguments for innate hereditary differences, as opposed to cultural inheritance. Tylor, in particular, rejected Bagehot's view of the centrality of physical heredity, or that the modern "savage" mind had become "tattooed over with monstrous images" by which base instincts had been preserved in crevices, as opposed to accomplished European man, for whom such instincts had been smoothed away through the inherited will to exercise reason.[11]
Collections of Bagehot's literary, political, and economic essays were published after his death. Their subjects ranged fromShakespeare andDisraeli to the price of silver. Every year, the BritishPolitical Studies Association awards the Walter Bagehot Prize for the best dissertation in the field of government andpublic administration.
Bagehot's collected works were issued in a set of 15 volumes, published byThe Economist between 1965 and 1986, and edited byNorman St. John-Stevas.
The Economist carries a weekly current affairs commentary entitled "Bagehot", which is named in his honour and is described as "an analysis of British life and politics, in the tradition of Walter Bagehot".[16][17] As of January 2022[update], the column has been written by Duncan Robinson, political editor of the publication.
^Selinger, William; Conti, Greg (2015). "Reappraising Walter Bagehot's Liberalism: Discussion, Public Opinion, and the Meaning of Parliamentary Government".History of European Ideas.41 (2): 264.doi:10.1080/01916599.2014.926105.S2CID144027865.
^Hutton, Richard Holt (1915)."Memoirs." In:The Works and Life of Walter Bagehot, Vol. 1. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., pp. 1–54.
^Bagehot, Walter (November 1867)."Physics and Politics. No. I. The Pre-Economic Age".Hathi Trust. Fortnightly Review. Retrieved17 July 2018.This three-part article was published over the course of three years in the Fortnightly Review: the first section was published in November, 1867; the second section in April, 1868; and the third in July, 1869.
Halsted, John B. (1958). "Walter Bagehot on Toleration,"Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 119–28
Hanley, Brian (2004). "'The Greatest Victorian' in the New Century: The Enduring Relevance of Walter Bagehot's Commentary on Literature, Scholarship, and Public Life",Papers on Language and Literature, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 167–98
Irvine, William (1939).Walter Bagehot. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
Kolbe, F.C. (1908). "Walter Bagehot: An Appreciation,"The Irish Monthly, Vol. 36, No. 419, pp. 282–87
Lanchester, John, "The Invention of Money: How the heresies of two bankers became the basis of our modern economy",The New Yorker, 5 & 12 August 2019, pp. 28–31.
Morgan, Forrest (1995).Collected Works of Walter Bagehot. Routledge
Ostlund, Leonard A. (1956). "Walter Bagehot—Pioneer Social Psychology Theorist,"Social Science, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 107–11
Spring, David (1976). "Walter Bagehot and Deference,"The American Historical Review, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 524–31
.jpg)
"Bagehot, Walter",A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature, 1910 – viaWikisource
