| Wadi Barada offensive (2016–2017) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part of theRif Dimashq Governorate campaign andHezbollah involvement in theSyrian Civil War | |||||||
.png) TheSyrian Air Force launches an airstrike on a village in Wadi Barada. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||
 Syrian Arab Republic Russia[1](from 2017) HezbollahGalilee Forces[2] |  Ahrar al-Sham Jaysh al-Islam[2] Free Syrian Army[2] Al-Nusra Front[3][4] | ||||||
| Commanders and leaders | |||||||
| Brig. Gen. Ali Mahmoud[6] (leading operations commander) Col.Ghiath Dalla[6](leading operations co-commander)  Gen.Maher al-Assad[7](4th Armoured Division commander) Brig. Gen. Ahmad Ghadban †[8](Syrian Army commander & chief negotiator) | Abu al-Baraa (Hassan Soufan)[9] (Ahrar al-Sham commander) Col. Hammoud Douka †[10][better source needed](FSA top commander) | ||||||
| Units involved | |||||||
| |||||||
| Strength | |||||||
| 5,000+[16] | 2,000+(as of 1 January 2017)[17] 500 (pro-government claim, after 26 January 2017)[18] | ||||||
| Casualties and losses | |||||||
 7+ killed (January 2017)[19] | Unknown killed 700 surrendered (SOHR claim)[20] 2,600 surrendered (government claim)[18] | ||||||
| 21+ civilians killed, 23 wounded (December 2016, January 2017);[9][21] 50,000 displaced[22] | |||||||
TheWadi Barada offensive (2016–2017) was a military operation against rebel-held villages in theBarada River valley by theSyrian Army and allied forces, including pro-government militias and LebaneseHezbollah between December 2016 and January 2017. The Barada River valley includes the village ofAin al-Fijah which holds awater spring that provides drinking water to towns throughout theRif Dimashq Governorate.[23] During the offensive, a Government airstrike temporarily destroyed the spring, in what the United Nations has called a "war crime".[24]
Syrian rebels affiliated with theFree Syrian Army captured the village ofSouq Wadi Barada in February 2012.Engineers andtechnicians who worked at the water spring remained in place. After the rebel capture of Wadi Barada, government forces imposed asiege on the villages,[23] with the UN and humanitarian assistance being repeatedly denied access to the locality between 2014 and 2017.[25]
In July 2016, Syrian government forces advanced into the village ofHarira in the Barada Valley. In response, theal-Nusra Frontexecuted 14prisoners of war on 20 July.[26] By 3 August, Syrian government andHezbollah forces captured Harira.
On 23 December 2016, alleging that rebels werepolluting the water spring in Ain al-Fijah withdiesel fuel, government forces conducted airstrikes and shelling on Wadi Barada.[27] TheU.N.'sIndependent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria found no evidence of deliberate contamination of the water supply or demolition by the rebels, as the Syrian government maintained at the time, and no reports water contamination prior to the government's two air strikes on 23 December, and said these strikes cut off water from Damascus.[28][29] Theopen source investigative websiteBellingcat identified a video showing bombs impacting the building housing the spring.[30]
On 26 December, following airstrikes, the Syrian Army advanced into the valley from its outskirts and cliffs. 10 villages in the area were still held by the rebels.[9] The opposition accused the government forces of targeting Ain al-Fijah and nearby villages withbarrel bombs, leading to severe damage of the spring.[31]
On 1 January 2017, pro-government websiteAl-Masdar reported that the Syrian Army entered Ayn al-Fijah after civilians were evacuated by theSyrian Arab Red Crescent.[32] Heavy clashes in the town continued on the next day, as localJabhat Fateh al-Sham defenders attempted to halt the army andHezbollah's advance, according to the UK-basedSyrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR).[4]
On 3 January, according to social media posts and SOHR, rebels stated that they would let teams enter and fix the spring as long as the government would honor the ceasefire and lift the siege.[33][34] Pro-government media reported that the government called for the rebels to surrender the water spring and restore the water supply for Damascus, and government forces proceeded to launch another attack on the following day, targeting the rebel-held village ofBasimah, capturing several sites around the village, including Basimah Orphanage, which they claimed was used as rebel base,[13] while the SAA and Hezbollah ambushed what government sources described as Jabhat Fateh al-Sham fighters crossing from Lebanon into Syria, resulting in some casualties with the rest retreating toArsal Municipality of theBeqa'a Governorate.[12]
On 6 January, pro-government media reported that the4th Armoured Division underMaher al-Assad's command arrived in Wadi Barada to aid the government offensive,[7] and that the army then captured all hills overlookingBasimah.[35] Later that day, pro-government media claimed that a ceasefire deal had been reached.[36]
By 8 January, the government forces resumed their offensive, with al-Masdar saying they captured the hills northwest ofDeir Maqran, most importantly Tal Dahr Al-Masabi.[37] On 10 January, al-Masdar said thatRussian Air Force conducted airstrikes against rebels in the area for the first time, while the Syrian Army also bombarded targets near the villages of Basimah and Deir Maqran.[38]
Multiple eyewitnesses toldHuman Rights Watch that the bombardment of Basimah included the use ofchemical weapons: "they smelledchlorine and described clinical signs and symptoms consistent with exposure to chlorine gas".[39] The attacks took place in a civilian neighbourhood with no opposition armed presence and resulted in 46 civilians being treated in hospital for chemical weapons exposure.[39]
Around 12 January, SOHR reported, the government flag was raised in Ayn al-Fijah, Basimah, and other villages, whereupon these settlements, with reports of "reconciliation" agreements made with local notables to enable the government to take control of the water supply, including the transfer of fighters to their stronghold ofIdlib Governorate. Several rebels continued to resist and attempted to keep control of the settlements.[40] By then, about 50,000 residents of the valley had been displaced due to the fighting.[22]
.png)
On 13 January, government media reported that Basimah was captured by pro-government forces,[41] and that they advanced into Ain al-Khadra. According to opposition sources, rebel forces managed to retake Ain al-Khadra soon after.[42] Later that day, government media asserted that Ain al-Fijah,Kafr al-Awamid,Souq Wadi Barada,Dayr Qanoo,Dayr Miqrin andKafr az Zaytsigned a reconciliation agreement with the government, allowing technicians to fix the water springs and to raise the government flag over the towns. Several rebel units continued fighting, with government media reporting they attacked the technical crews with rockets.[43][44]
On late 14 January, government media said that maintenance vehicles arrived at the Ain Al-Fijah springs, along with some buses to transport rebels to Idlib Governorate.[45] Later that day, however, government media reported that a sniper killed the Syrian Army general and chief negotiator Ahmad Ghadban as he was returning to the government lines.[8] Though the rebels subsequently said they had nothing to do with Ghadban's death,[46] government forces declared they would resume the offensive.[8] The army consequently launched another assault on Ain al-Khadra in the following night, and captured the village.[47][48] On the next day, Hezbollah-led forces advanced into the outskirts of Ain Al-Fijah and captured the hill of Ra’s al-Sirah to the town's north, resulting in fierce fighting with rebel fighters.[21][49] On the other side, government media reported that the Syrian Army took control of most ofAl-Husseiniyah after the local elders agreed to a ceasefire deal with the government. Nevertheless, some parts of the town remained outside government control as some rebels reportedly refused to surrender or leave.[50]
.png)
Over the next days Hezbollah and army units slowly advanced into Ain Al-Fijah.[10][51] On 19 January, government forces captured the village ofAfrah.[52][53] Later that day, representatives of the local rebels and the government agreed to another ceasefire and to attempt to enforce the peace deal that the involved parties had agreed upon before Ahmad Ghadban's death,[54] though this agreement, too, quickly collapsed, with both sides resuming hostilities. The rebels consequently blamed Hezbollah for the failure of the peace process, saying that the government could not restrain the Lebanese fighters.[55] On 26 January,al-Masdar News reported that another agreement had been reached between the government and the opposition fighters, with 2,600 rebels reportedly surrendering, leaving about 500 militants continuing to resist the pro-government takeover of Wadi Barada.[18]SOHR reported on the next day that fighting for Ain Al-Fijah continued unabated.[56][57]
On 28 January, however, SOHR and al-Masdar reported that the rebels finally retreated from Ain Al-Fijah as "goodwill gesture" for the implementation of the peace agreement of 26 January. The army subsequently took control of the town, and said the remaining opposition forces in the valley would be allowed to leave forIdlib Governorate.[58][59]
A day later, the Army took full control of Wadi Barada, and the water supply to Greater Damascus was restored.[5] Later on, the first buses carrying rebels left for Idlib, while al-Masdar News reported that some Jabhat Fatah al-Sham fighters attacked other opposition groups in Kafr az Zayt due to disagreements over the ceasefire.[60]
On 29 December, Syrian government and opposition delegations agreed on talks to achieve a ceasefire at Wadi Barada. Rebels from both the FSA andJabhat Fatah al-Sham would be given free passage to theIdlib Governorate in exchange of the rebel surrender of Wadi Barada west of Damascus. If so,al-Zabadani andMadaya would be isolated and could be used by the Syrian government to press for another ceasefire and evacuation.[61]
.png)
On 6 January, Hezbollah reportedly proposed a ceasefire but was rejected byAhrar al-Sham, which claimed that the government had earlier rejected a ceasefire which would allow the repair of awater pumping station according to them damaged by airstrikes. Around 5.5 million people around Damascus had little to no access torunning water for two weeks as a result of the conflict.[62] Despite this, an agreement for a truce was reportedly still reached on the same day; according to the new deal maintenance workshops would be granted access to fix the damaged water spring, and local militants would handle over their medium and heavy weaponry and would be enrolled in local committees. Those who refused to have their status settled, would be transported toIdlib.[36]
On 13 January, Ain al-Fijah, Kafr al-Awamid, Souq Wadi Barada, Dayr Qanoo, Dayr Miqrin and Kafr az Zayt signed a deal with the government under Russian mediation, with SOHR reporting the following contents: (1) Exemption of locals from army service for six months; (2) delivery of most arms to the government; (3) wanted locals are allowed to settle their conditions with government security agencies; (4) no armed presence around the towns is allowed; (5) non-native rebels are sent to Idlib; (6) all rebels who want to voluntarily leave the valley for Idlib are allowed to do so; (7) the military is not allowed to enter the homes of locals; (8) the military can set up checkpoints within the towns, at their entrances, and along the main roads; (9) locals and former rebels are allowed to join theNational Defence Forces; (10) expelled employees in the valley can return to their jobs.[44] These negotiations broke down following the death of the Syrian government's chief negotiator.[46] Another attempt to enforce this agreement was made on 19 January,[54] which also quickly broke down.[55] The International Meeting on Syrian Settlement was then held inAstana, Kazakhstan as part of thepeace process, whereBashar Jaafari, the U.N. envoy representing the Syrian government, announced that the ceasefire that began in December 2016 did not apply to the Barada region because of a terrorist presence.[63] On 26 January it was reported by pro-government media that over 2,600 militants had laid down their arms, most returning to civilian life or joining self-defense units.[18]
In 2018, following the capture of the area by Government forces,Human Rights Watch accused the Syrian Government of "unlawfully preventing displaced residents from former anti-government-held areas from returning to their properties".[64]
United Nations: The U.N. Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria claimed that it had found no evidence of deliberate contamination of the Wadi Barada water supply or demolition by rebels, and instead accused the Syrian Air Force of having deliberately bombed the water sources in December 2016. The commission said that "the attack amounts to the war crime of attacking objects indispensable for the survival of the civilian population, and further violated the principle of proportionality in attacks".[29]Jan Egeland, head of theNorwegian Refugee Council inGeneva, stated that "To sabotage and deny water is of course awar crime, because it is civilians who drink it and civilians who will be affected bywaterborne diseases if supplies are not restored".[24]
