Viking 1 was the first of twospacecraft, along withViking 2, each consisting of an orbiter and a lander, sent toMars as part ofNASA'sViking program.[2] The lander touched down on Mars on July 20, 1976, the first successful Mars lander in history.Viking 1 operated on Mars for 2,307 days (over 61⁄4 years) or 2245Martian solar days, the longest extraterrestrial surface mission until the record was broken by theOpportunity rover on May 19, 2010.[6]
Following launch using aTitan/Centaur launch vehicle on August 20, 1975, and an 11-month cruise to Mars,[7] the orbiter began returning global images of Mars about five days before orbit insertion. TheViking 1 Orbiter was inserted into Mars orbit on June 19, 1976,[8] and trimmed to a 1,513 x 33,000 km, 24.66 h site certification orbit on June 21. Landing on Mars was planned for July 4, 1976, theUnited States Bicentennial, but imaging of the primary landing site showed it was too rough for a safe landing.[9] The landing was delayed until a safer site was found,[9] and took place instead on July 20,[8] the seventh anniversary of theApollo 11 Moon landing.[10] The lander separated from the orbiter at 08:51UTC and landed atChryse Planitia at 11:53:06 UTC.[11] It was the first attempt by the United States at landing on Mars.[12]
The instruments of theorbiter consisted of twovidicon cameras for imaging, an infrared spectrometer for water vapor mapping, and infrared radiometers for thermal mapping.[13] The orbiter primary mission ended at the beginning ofsolar conjunction on November 5, 1976. The extended mission commenced on December 14, 1976, after solar conjunction.[14] Operations included close approaches toPhobos in February 1977.[15] Theperiapsis was reduced to 300 km on March 11, 1977.[16] Minor orbit adjustments were done occasionally over the course of the mission, primarily to change the walk rate — the rate at which the areocentric longitude changed with each orbit, and the periapsis was raised to 357 km on July 20, 1979. On August 7, 1980,Viking 1 Orbiter was running low onattitude control gas and its orbit was raised from 357 × 33,943 km to 320 × 56,000 km to prevent impact with Mars and possible contamination until the year 2019. Operations were terminated on August 17, 1980, after 1,485 orbits. A 2009 analysis concluded that, while the possibility thatViking 1 had impacted Mars could not be ruled out, it was most likely still in orbit.[17] More than 57,000 images were sent back to Earth.
The lander and itsaeroshell separated from the orbiter on July 20 at 08:51 UTC. At the time of separation, the lander was orbiting at about 5 kilometers per second (3.1 miles per second). The aeroshell's retrorockets fired to begin the lander de-orbit maneuver. After a few hours at about 300 kilometers (190 miles) altitude, the lander was reoriented for atmospheric entry. The aeroshell with its ablativeheat shield slowed the craft as it plunged through theatmosphere. During this time, entry science experiments were performed by using a retarding potential analyzer, amass spectrometer, as well as pressure, temperature, and density sensors.[13] At 6 km (3.7 mi) altitude, traveling at about 250 meters per second (820 feet per second), the 16 m diameter lander parachutes deployed. Seven seconds later the aeroshell was jettisoned, and eight seconds after that the three lander legs were extended. In 45 seconds, theparachute had slowed the lander to 60 meters per second (200 feet per second). At 1.5 km (0.93 mi) altitude, retrorockets on the lander itself were ignited and, 40 seconds later at about 2.4 m/s (7.9 ft/s), the lander arrived on Mars with a relatively light jolt. The legs had honeycomb aluminum shock absorbers to soften the landing.[13]
Documentary clip recounting theViking 1 landing with animation and video footage of the control center
The landing rockets used an 18-nozzle design to spread the hydrogen and nitrogen exhaust over a large area. NASA calculated that this approach would mean that the surface would not be heated by more than 1 °C (1.8 °F), and that it would move no more than 1 millimeter (0.04 inches) of surface material.[11] Since most of Viking's experiments focused on the surface material a more straightforward design would not have served.[18]
TheViking 1 lander touched down in westernChryse Planitia ("Golden Plain") at22°41′49″N312°03′00″E / 22.697°N 312.05°E /22.697; 312.05[2][11] at a reference altitude of −2.69 kilometers (−1.67 mi) relative to a reference ellipsoid with an equatorial radius of 3,397 kilometers (2,111 mi) and a flatness of 0.0105 (22.480° N, 47.967° W planetographic) at 11:53:06 UTC (16:13 local Mars time).[18] Approximately 22 kilograms (49 lb) of propellants were left at landing.[11]
Transmission of the first surface image began 25 seconds after landing and took about four minutes (see below). During these minutes the lander activated itself. It erected a high-gain antenna pointed toward Earth for direct communication and deployed a meteorology boom mounted with sensors. In the next seven minutes the second picture of the 300° panoramic scene (displayed below) was taken.[19] On the day after the landing the first color picture of the surface of Mars (displayed below) was taken. The seismometer failed to uncage, and a sampler arm locking pin was stuck and took five days to shake out. Otherwise, all experiments functioned normally.
The lander had two means of returning data to Earth: a relay link up to the orbiter and back, and by using a direct link to Earth. The orbiter could transmit to Earth (S-band) at 2,000 to 16,000 bit/s (depending on distance between Mars and Earth), and the lander could transmit to the orbiter at 16,000 bit/s.[20] The data capacity of the relay link was about 10 times higher than the direct link.[13]
First "clear" image ever transmitted from the surface of Mars – showsrocks near theViking 1 Lander (July 20, 1976). The haze on the left is possibly dust that had recently been kicked up by the landing rockets. Because of the "slow scan" facsimile nature of the cameras, the dust settled by mid-image.
The lander had two facsimile cameras; three analyses for metabolism, growth or photosynthesis; a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer; an x-ray fluorescence spectrometer; pressure, temperature and wind velocity sensors; a three-axis seismometer; a magnet on a sampler observed by the cameras; and various engineering sensors.[13]
Photo of the Viking 1 Mars lander taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter in 2006
TheViking 1 lander was named theThomas Mutch Memorial Station in January 1981 in honor ofThomas A. Mutch, the leader of the Viking imaging team.[21] The lander operated for 2,245sols (about 2,306 Earth days or 6 years) until November 11, 1982 (sol 2600), when a faulty command sent by ground control resulted in loss of contact. The command was intended to uplink new battery charging software to improve the lander's deteriorating battery capacity, but it inadvertently overwrote data used by the antenna pointing software. Attempts to contact the lander during the next four months, based on the presumed antenna position, were unsuccessful.[22] In 2006, theViking 1 lander was imaged on the Martian surface by theMars Reconnaissance Orbiter.[23]
Viking 1 operated on the surface of Mars for approximately six Earth years and 114 days – until November 11, 1982, when the lander was inadvertently sent a faulty command. The robotic sampler arm successfully scooped up soil samples and tested them with instruments such as theGas chromatography–mass spectrometer. Atmospheric temperature recordings were as high as -14 C (7 F) at midday, and the predawn summer temperature was -77 C (-107 F). The landers had issues obtaining results from theirseismometer.[24][25]
Viking 1 carried a biology experiment whose purpose was to look for evidence of life. TheViking lander biological experiments weighed 15.5 kg (34 lbs) and consisted of three subsystems: thepyrolytic release experiment (PR), the labeled release experiment (LR), and the gas exchange experiment (GEX). In addition, independent of the biology experiments, Viking carried a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer that could measure the composition and abundance of organic compounds in the Martian soil.[26] The results were surprising and interesting: the spectrometer gave a negative result; the PR gave a negative result, the GEX gave a negative result, and the LR gave a positive result.[27] Viking scientist Patricia Straat stated in 2009, "Our [LR] experiment was a definite positive response for life, but a lot of people have claimed that it was a false positive for a variety of reasons."[28] Most scientists now believe that the data were due to inorganic chemical reactions of the soil; however, this view may be changing after the recent discovery of near-surface ice near theViking landing zone.[29] Some scientists still believe the results were due to living reactions. No organic chemicals were found in the soil. However, dry areas ofAntarctica do not have detectable organic compounds either, but they have organisms living in the rocks.[30] Mars has almost no ozone layer, unlike the Earth, so UV light sterilizes the surface and produces highly reactive chemicals such as peroxides that would oxidize any organic chemicals.[31] ThePhoenix Lander discovered the chemicalperchlorate in the Martian soil. Perchlorate is a strong oxidant so it may have destroyed any organic matter on the surface.[32] If it is widespread on Mars,carbon-based life would be difficult at the soil surface.
High-precision test of general relativity by theCassini space probe (artist's impression)
Gravitational time dilation is a phenomenon predicted by the theory ofgeneral relativity whereby time passes more slowly in regions of lowergravitational potential. Scientists used the lander to test this hypothesis, by sending radio signals to the lander on Mars, and instructing the lander to send back signals, in cases which sometimes included the signal passing close to the Sun. Scientists found that the observedShapiro delays of the signals matched the predictions of general relativity.[33]
^Jefferson, David C; Demcak, Stuart W; Esposito, Pasquale B; Kruizinga, Gerhard L (August 10–13, 2009).An Investigation of the Orbital Status of Viking-1(PDF). AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on November 7, 2017.
Missions are ordered by launch date. Sign† indicates failure en route or before intended mission data returned.‡ indicates use of the planet as agravity assist en route to another destination.
Payloads are separated by bullets ( · ), launches by pipes ( | ). Crewed flights are indicated inunderline. Uncatalogued launch failures are listed initalics. Payloads deployed from other spacecraft are denoted in (brackets).