TheVenus Genetrix (also spelledgenitrix)[1] is a sculptural type which shows the Roman goddessVenus in her aspect ofGenetrix ("foundress of the family"), as she was honoured by theJulio-Claudian dynasty of Rome, which claimed her as their ancestor. Contemporary references identify the sculptor as a Greek namedArcesilaus.[2] The statue was set up inJulius Caesar'snew forum, probably as thecult statue in thecella of histemple of Venus Genetrix.[3] Through this historical chance, a Roman designation is applied to an iconological type ofAphrodite that originated among theGreeks.
On the night before the decisivebattle of Pharsalus (48 BC), Julius Caesar vowed to dedicate a temple at Rome to Venus, supposed ancestor of hisgens. In fulfilment of his vow he erected a temple of Venus Genetrix in the new forum he constructed. In establishing this new cult of Venus,[4] Caesar was affirming the claim of his owngens to descent from the goddess, throughIulus, the son ofAeneas. It was in part to flatter this connection thatVirgil wrote theAeneid. His public cult expressed the unique standing of Caesar at the end of theRoman Republic and, in that sense, of a personal association expressed as public cult was the innovation in Roman religion.
Two types, represented in many Roman examples in marble, bronze, and terra cotta, contend among scholars for identification as representing the type of this drapedVenus Genetrix. Besides the type described further below, is another, in which Venus carries an infantEros on her shoulder.[5]
In 420 - 410 BC, the Athenian sculptorCallimachus created a bronze sculpture of Aphrodite (now lost). It showed her dressed in a light but clingingchiton orpeplos, which was lowered on the left shoulder to reveal her left breast and hung down in a sheer face and decoratively carved so as not to hide the outlines of the woman's body. Venus was depicted holding the apple won in theJudgement of Paris in her left hand, whilst her right hand moved to cover her head. From the lost bronze original are derived all surviving copies. The composition was frontal,[6] the body's form monumental, and in the surviving Roman replicas its proportions are close to thePolyclitean canon.[citation needed]
The now-lost original statue, or Sabina in the same pose, is represented on the reverse of adenarius above the legendVENERI GENETRICI (‘to Venus Genetrix’),[7] withVibia Sabina on the obverse. The iconological type of the statue, of which there are numerous Roman marble copies and bronze reductions at every level of skill, was identified asVenus Genetrix (Venus Universal Mother) byEnnio Quirino Visconti in his catalogue of the papal collections in thePio-Clementino Museum by comparison with this denarius. "From the inscription on the coins, from the similarity between the figure on the coins andthe statue in the Louvre and from the fact thatArkesilaos established the type of Venus Genetrix as patron goddess of Rome, and ancestress of the Julian race, the identification was a very natural one."[8] AVenus Genetrix in the Pio-Clementino Museum has been completed with a Roman portrait head of Sabina, on this basis.[9]
A number of theRoman examples are in major collections, including theCentrale Montemartini[10] (discovered in theGardens of Maecenas),Detroit Institute of Arts,[11]Metropolitan Museum of Art,[12] theRoyal Ontario Museum,[13] theJ. Paul Getty Museum,[14] theLouvre Museum, and theHermitage Museum.
A 1.64 m-high Roman statue, dating from the end of the 1st century BC to the start of the 1st century AD, inParian marble, was discovered atFréjus (Forum Julii) in 1650. It is considered as the best Roman copy of the lost Greek work.
The neck, the left hand, the fingers of the right hand, the plinth, and many parts of the drape are modern restorations. It was present in the palace of theTuileries in 1678, and was transported from there to the park ofVersailles about 1685. It was seized in the Revolution, and has thus been in the Louvre since 1803, as Inventaire MR 367 (n° usuel Ma 525). The statue was restored in 1999 thanks to the patronage ofFIMALAC.
Another Roman copy of the statue, which is 2.14 m high, was in the collection ofGiampietro Campana, marchese di Cavelli, Villa Campana, Rome, from which it was acquired for the Hermitage in 1861, following Campana's disgrace.
The head does not belong to this statue, which must originally have had a portrait head. In Rome, an ideal figure of a divinity might often be adapted slightly (here, for instance the chiton covers the breast) and given a separately made portrait head. Evidence that this was the case here can be seen in the locks of hair falling onto the shoulders. These are also seen in posthumous portraits ofAgrippina the Elder, which enables us to date this statue to the second quarter of the 1st century AD.
[…] orthographic variants already found in works of classical authors (e.g.monumenta / monimenta, saltem / saltim,genitrix /genetrix, coniunx / coniux)
