Example of samples from two populations with the same mean but different variances. The red population has mean 100 and variance 100 (SD=10) while the blue population has mean 100 and variance 2500 (SD=50) where SD stands for Standard Deviation.
An advantage of variance as a measure of dispersion is that it is more amenable to algebraic manipulation than other measures of dispersion such as theexpected absolute deviation; for example, the variance of a sum of uncorrelated random variables is equal to the sum of their variances. A disadvantage of the variance for practical applications is that, unlike the standard deviation, its units differ from the random variable, which is why the standard deviation is more commonly reported as a measure of dispersion once the calculation is finished. Another disadvantage is that the variance is not finite for many distributions.
There are two distinct concepts that are both called "variance". One, as discussed above, is part of a theoreticalprobability distribution and is defined by an equation. The other variance is a characteristic of a set of observations. When variance is calculated from observations, those observations are typically measured from a real-world system. If all possible observations of the system are present, then the calculated variance is called the population variance. Normally, however, only a subset is available, and the variance calculated from this is called the sample variance. The variance calculated from a sample is considered an estimate of the full population variance. There are multiple ways to estimate the population variance on the basis of the sample variance, as discussed in the section below.
The two kinds of variance are closely related. To see how, consider that a theoretical probability distribution can be used as a generator of hypothetical observations. If an infinite number of observations are generated using a distribution, then the sample variance calculated from that infinite set will match the value calculated using the distribution's equation for variance. Variance has a central role in statistics, where some ideas that use it includedescriptive statistics,statistical inference,hypothesis testing,goodness of fit, andMonte Carlo sampling.
Geometric visualisation of the variance of an arbitrary distribution (2, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 7, 9):
A frequency distribution is constructed.
The centroid of the distribution gives its mean.
A square with sides equal to the difference of each value from the mean is formed for each value.
Arranging the squares into a rectangle with one side equal to the number of values,n, results in the other side being the distribution's variance,σ2.
The variance is also equivalent to the secondcumulant of a probability distribution that generates. The variance is typically designated as, or sometimes as or, or symbolically as or simply (pronounced "sigma squared"). The expression for the variance can be expanded as follows:
In other words, the variance ofX is equal to the mean of the square ofX minus the square of the mean ofX. This equation should not be used for computations usingfloating-point arithmetic, because it suffers fromcatastrophic cancellation if the two components of the equation are similar in magnitude. For other numerically stable alternatives, seealgorithms for calculating variance.
(When such a discreteweighted variance is specified by weights whose sum is not 1, then one divides by the sum of the weights.)
The variance of a collection of equally likely values can be written as
where is the average value. That is,
The variance of a set of equally likely values can be equivalently expressed, without directly referring to the mean, in terms of squared deviations of all pairwise squared distances of points from each other:[2]
A fairsix-sided die can be modeled as a discrete random variable,X, with outcomes 1 through 6, each with equal probability 1/6. The expected value ofX is Therefore, the variance ofX is
The general formula for the variance of the outcome,X, of ann-sided die is
If a distribution does not have a finite expected value, as is the case for theCauchy distribution, then the variance cannot be finite either. However, some distributions may not have a finite variance, despite their expected value being finite. An example is aPareto distribution whoseindex satisfies
The general formula for variance decomposition or thelaw of total variance is: If and are two random variables, and the variance of exists, then
Theconditional expectation of given, and theconditional variance may be understood as follows. Given any particular valuey of the random variable Y, there is a conditional expectation given the event Y = y. This quantity depends on the particular value y; it is a function. That same function evaluated at the random variableY is the conditional expectation
In particular, if is a discrete random variable assuming possible values with corresponding probabilities, then in the formula for total variance, the first term on the right-hand side becomes
where. Similarly, the second term on the right-hand side becomes
where and. Thus the total variance is given by
A similar formula is applied inanalysis of variance, where the corresponding formula is
here refers to the Mean of the Squares. Inlinear regression analysis the corresponding formula is
This can also be derived from the additivity of variances, since the total (observed) score is the sum of the predicted score and the error score, where the latter two are uncorrelated.
Similar decompositions are possible for the sum of squared deviations (sum of squares,):
The secondmoment of a random variable attains the minimum value when taken around the first moment (i.e., mean) of the random variable, i.e.. Conversely, if a continuous function satisfies for all random variablesX, then it is necessarily of the form, wherea > 0. This also holds in the multidimensional case.[3]
Unlike theexpected absolute deviation, the variance of a variable has units that are the square of the units of the variable itself. For example, a variable measured in meters will have a variance measured in meters squared. For this reason, describing data sets via theirstandard deviation orroot mean square deviation is often preferred over using the variance. In the dice example the standard deviation is√2.9 ≈ 1.7, slightly larger than the expected absolute deviation of 1.5.
The standard deviation and the expected absolute deviation can both be used as an indicator of the "spread" of a distribution. The standard deviation is more amenable to algebraic manipulation than the expected absolute deviation, and, together with variance and its generalizationcovariance, is used frequently in theoretical statistics; however the expected absolute deviation tends to be morerobust as it is less sensitive tooutliers arising frommeasurement anomalies or an undulyheavy-tailed distribution.
Variance isinvariant with respect to changes in alocation parameter. That is, if a constant is added to all values of the variable, the variance is unchanged:
If all values are scaled by a constant, the variance isscaled by the square of that constant:
The variance of a sum of two random variables is given by
If the random variables are such thatthen they are said to beuncorrelated. It follows immediately from the expression given earlier that if the random variables are uncorrelated, then the variance of their sum is equal to the sum of their variances, or, expressed symbolically:
Since independent random variables are always uncorrelated (seeCovariance § Uncorrelatedness and independence), the equation above holds in particular when the random variables are independent. Thus, independence is sufficient but not necessary for the variance of the sum to equal the sum of the variances.
Matrix notation for the variance of a linear combination
Define as a column vector of random variables, and as a column vector of scalars. Therefore, is alinear combination of these random variables, where denotes thetranspose of. Also let be thecovariance matrix of. The variance of is then given by:[4]
This implies that the variance of the mean can be written as (with a column vector of ones)
One reason for the use of the variance in preference to other measures of dispersion is that the variance of the sum (or the difference) ofuncorrelated random variables is the sum of their variances:
This statement is called theBienaymé formula[5] and was discovered in 1853.[6][7] It is often made with the stronger condition that the variables areindependent, but being uncorrelated suffices. So if all the variables have the same variance σ2, then, since division byn is a linear transformation, this formula immediately implies that the variance of their mean is
That is, the variance of the mean decreases whenn increases. This formula for the variance of the mean is used in the definition of thestandard error of the sample mean, which is used in thecentral limit theorem.
To prove the initial statement, it suffices to show that
The general result then follows by induction. Starting with the definition,
Using the linearity of theexpectation operator and the assumption of independence (or uncorrelatedness) ofX andY, this further simplifies as follows:
In general, the variance of the sum ofn variables is the sum of theircovariances:
(Note: The second equality comes from the fact thatCov(Xi,Xi) = Var(Xi).)
Here, is thecovariance, which is zero for independent random variables (if it exists). The formula states that the variance of a sum is equal to the sum of all elements in the covariance matrix of the components. The next expression states equivalently that the variance of the sum is the sum of the diagonal of covariance matrix plus two times the sum of its upper triangular elements (or its lower triangular elements); this emphasizes that the covariance matrix is symmetric. This formula is used in the theory ofCronbach's alpha inclassical test theory.
So, if the variables have equal varianceσ2 and the averagecorrelation of distinct variables isρ, then the variance of their mean is
This implies that the variance of the mean increases with the average of the correlations. In other words, additional correlated observations are not as effective as additional independent observations at reducing theuncertainty of the mean. Moreover, if the variables have unit variance, for example if they are standardized, then this simplifies to
This formula is used in theSpearman–Brown prediction formula of classical test theory. This converges toρ ifn goes to infinity, provided that the average correlation remains constant or converges too. So for the variance of the mean of standardized variables with equal correlations or converging average correlation we have
Therefore, the variance of the mean of a large number of standardized variables is approximately equal to their average correlation. This makes clear that the sample mean of correlated variables does not generally converge to the population mean, even though thelaw of large numbers states that the sample mean will converge for independent variables.
Sum of uncorrelated variables with random sample size
There are cases when a sample is taken without knowing, in advance, how many observations will be acceptable according to some criterion. In such cases, the sample sizeN is a random variable whose variation adds to the variation ofX, such that,[8]which follows from thelaw of total variance.
The scaling property and the Bienaymé formula, along with the property of thecovarianceCov(aX, bY) =ab Cov(X, Y) jointly imply that
This implies that in a weighted sum of variables, the variable with the largest weight will have a disproportionally large weight in the variance of the total. For example, ifX andY are uncorrelated and the weight ofX is two times the weight ofY, then the weight of the variance ofX will be four times the weight of the variance ofY.
The expression above can be extended to a weighted sum of multiple variables:
Real-world observations such as the measurements of yesterday's rain throughout the day typically cannot be complete sets of all possible observations that could be made. As such, the variance calculated from the finite set will in general not match the variance that would have been calculated from the full population of possible observations. This means that oneestimates the mean and variance from a limited set of observations by using anestimator equation. The estimator is a function of thesample ofnobservations drawn without observational bias from the wholepopulation of potential observations. In this example, the sample would be the set of actual measurements of yesterday's rainfall from available rain gauges within the geography of interest.
The simplest estimators for population mean and population variance are simply the mean and variance of the sample, thesample mean and(uncorrected) sample variance – these areconsistent estimators (they converge to the value of the whole population as the number of samples increases) but can be improved. Most simply, the sample variance is computed as the sum ofsquared deviations about the (sample) mean, divided byn as the number of samples. However, using values other thann improves the estimator in various ways. Four common values for the denominator aren,n − 1,n + 1, andn − 1.5:n is the simplest (the variance of the sample),n − 1 eliminates bias,[10]n + 1 minimizesmean squared error for the normal distribution,[11] andn − 1.5 mostly eliminates bias inunbiased estimation of standard deviation for the normal distribution.[12]
Firstly, if the true population mean is unknown, then the sample variance (which uses the sample mean in place of the true mean) is abiased estimator: it underestimates the variance by a factor of (n − 1) /n; correcting this factor, resulting in the sum of squared deviations about the sample mean divided byn -1 instead ofn, is calledBessel's correction.[10] The resulting estimator is unbiased and is called the(corrected) sample variance orunbiased sample variance. If the mean is determined in some other way than from the same samples used to estimate the variance, then this bias does not arise, and the variance can safely be estimated as that of the samples about the (independently known) mean.
Secondly, the sample variance does not generally minimizemean squared error between sample variance and population variance. Correcting for bias often makes this worse: one can always choose a scale factor that performs better than the corrected sample variance, though the optimal scale factor depends on theexcess kurtosis of the population (seemean squared error: variance) and introduces bias. This always consists of scaling down the unbiased estimator (dividing by a number larger thann − 1) and is a simple example of ashrinkage estimator: one "shrinks" the unbiased estimator towards zero. For the normal distribution, dividing byn + 1 (instead ofn − 1 orn) minimizes mean squared error.[11] The resulting estimator is biased, however, and is known as thebiased sample variation.
In general, thepopulation variance of afinitepopulation of sizeN with valuesxi is given by
where the population mean is and, where is theexpectation value operator.
The population variance can also be computed using[13]
(The right side has duplicate terms in the sum while the middle side has only unique terms to sum.) This is true because
The population variance matches the variance of the generating probability distribution. In this sense, the concept of population can be extended to continuous random variables with infinite populations.
In many practical situations, the true variance of a population is not knowna priori and must be computed somehow. When dealing with extremely large populations, it is not possible to count every object in the population, so the computation must be performed on asample of the population.[14] This is generally referred to assample variance orempirical variance. Sample variance can also be applied to the estimation of the variance of a continuous distribution from a sample of that distribution.
We take asample with replacement ofn valuesY1, ...,Yn from the population of sizeN, wheren <N, and estimate the variance on the basis of this sample.[15] Directly taking the variance of the sample data gives the average of thesquared deviations:[16]
Since theYi are selected randomly, both and arerandom variables. Their expected values can be evaluated by averaging over the ensemble of all possible samples{Yi} of sizen from the population. For this gives:
Here derived in the section ispopulation variance and due to independency of and.
Hence gives an estimate of the population variance that is biased by a factor of because the expectation value of is smaller than the population variance (true variance) by that factor. For this reason, is referred to as thebiased sample variance.
Correcting for this bias yields theunbiased sample variance, denoted:
Either estimator may be simply referred to as thesample variance when the version can be determined by context. The same proof is also applicable for samples taken from a continuous probability distribution.
The use of the termn − 1 is calledBessel's correction, and it is also used insample covariance and thesample standard deviation (the square root of variance). The square root is aconcave function and thus introduces negative bias (byJensen's inequality), which depends on the distribution, and thus the corrected sample standard deviation (using Bessel's correction) is biased. Theunbiased estimation of standard deviation is a technically involved problem, though for the normal distribution using the termn − 1.5 yields an almost unbiased estimator.
The unbiased sample variance is aU-statistic for the functionf(y1,y2) = (y1 −y2)2/2, meaning that it is obtained by averaging a 2-sample statistic over 2-element subsets of the population.
For a set of numbers {10, 15, 30, 45, 57, 52, 63, 72, 81, 93, 102, 105}, if this set is the whole data population for some measurement, then variance is the population variance 932.743 as the sum of the squared deviations about the mean of this set, divided by 12 as the number of the set members. If the set is a sample from the whole population, then the unbiased sample variance can be calculated as 1017.538 that is the sum of the squared deviations about the mean of the sample, divided by 11 instead of 12. A function VAR.S inMicrosoft Excel gives the unbiased sample variance while VAR.P is for population variance.
If the conditions of thelaw of large numbers hold for the squared observations,S2 is aconsistent estimator of σ2. One can see indeed that the variance of the estimator tends asymptotically to zero. An asymptotically equivalent formula was given in Kenney and Keeping (1951:164), Rose and Smith (2002:264), and Weisstein (n.d.).[20][21][22]
Samuelson's inequality is a result that states bounds on the values that individual observations in a sample can take, given that the sample mean and (biased) variance have been calculated.[23] Values must lie within the limits
TheF-test of equality of variances and thechi square tests are adequate when the sample is normally distributed. Non-normality makes testing for the equality of two or more variances more difficult.
Several non parametric tests have been proposed: these include the Barton–David–Ansari–Freund–Siegel–Tukey test, theCapon test,Mood test, theKlotz test and theSukhatme test. The Sukhatme test applies to two variances and requires that bothmedians be known and equal to zero. The Mood, Klotz, Capon and Barton–David–Ansari–Freund–Siegel–Tukey tests also apply to two variances. They allow the median to be unknown but do require that the two medians are equal.
TheLehmann test is a parametric test of two variances. Of this test there are several variants known. Other tests of the equality of variances include theBox test, theBox–Anderson test and theMoses test.
Resampling methods, which include thebootstrap and thejackknife, may be used to test the equality of variances.
The variance of a probability distribution is analogous to themoment of inertia inclassical mechanics of a corresponding mass distribution along a line, with respect to rotation about its center of mass.[26] It is because of this analogy that such things as the variance are calledmoments ofprobability distributions.[26] The covariance matrix is related to themoment of inertia tensor for multivariate distributions. The moment of inertia of a cloud ofn points with a covariance matrix of is given by[citation needed]
This difference between moment of inertia in physics and in statistics is clear for points that are gathered along a line. Suppose many points are close to thex axis and distributed along it. The covariance matrix might look like
That is, there is the most variance in thex direction. Physicists would consider this to have a low momentabout thex axis so the moment-of-inertia tensor is
Thesemivariance is calculated in the same manner as the variance but only those observations that fall below the mean are included in the calculation:It is also described as a specific measure in different fields of application. For skewed distributions, the semivariance can provide additional information that a variance does not.[27]
The great body of available statistics show us that the deviations of ahuman measurement from its mean follow very closely theNormal Law of Errors, and, therefore, that the variability may be uniformly measured by thestandard deviation corresponding to thesquare root of themean square error. When there are two independent causes of variability capable of producing in an otherwise uniform population distributions with standard deviations and, it is found that the distribution, when both causes act together, has a standard deviation. It is therefore desirable in analysing the causes of variability to deal with the square of the standard deviation as the measure of variability. We shall term this quantity the Variance...
If is avector-valued random variable, with values in and thought of as a column vector, then a natural generalization of variance is where and is the transpose ofX, and so is a row vector. The result is apositive semi-definite square matrix, commonly referred to as thevariance-covariance matrix (or simply as thecovariance matrix).
Another generalization of variance for vector-valued random variables, which results in a scalar value rather than in a matrix, is thegeneralized variance, thedeterminant of the covariance matrix. The generalized variance can be shown to be related to the multidimensional scatter of points around their mean.[29]
A different generalization is obtained by considering the equation for the scalar variance,, and reinterpreting as the squaredEuclidean distance between the random variable and its mean, or, simply as the scalar product of the vector with itself. This results in which is thetrace of the covariance matrix.
^Wasserman, Larry (2005).All of Statistics: a concise course in statistical inference. Springer texts in statistics. p. 51.ISBN978-1-4419-2322-6.
^Yuli Zhang; Huaiyu Wu; Lei Cheng (June 2012).Some new deformation formulas about variance and covariance. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control(ICMIC2012). pp. 987–992.
^Kagan, A.; Shepp, L. A. (1998). "Why the variance?".Statistics & Probability Letters.38 (4):329–333.doi:10.1016/S0167-7152(98)00041-8.
^Loève, M. (1977) "Probability Theory",Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Volume 45, 4th edition, Springer-Verlag, p. 12.
^Bienaymé, I.-J. (1853) "Considérations à l'appui de la découverte de Laplace sur la loi de probabilité dans la méthode des moindres carrés",Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences Paris, 37, p. 309–317; digital copy available[1]Archived 2018-06-23 at theWayback Machine
^Bienaymé, I.-J. (1867) "Considérations à l'appui de la découverte de Laplace sur la loi de probabilité dans la méthode des moindres carrés",Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, Série 2, Tome 12, p. 158–167; digital copy available[2][3]
^Cornell, J R, and Benjamin, C A,Probability, Statistics, and Decisions for Civil Engineers, McGraw-Hill, NY, 1970, pp.178-9.
^Brugger, R. M. (1969). "A Note on Unbiased Estimation of the Standard Deviation".The American Statistician.23 (4): 32.doi:10.1080/00031305.1969.10481865.
^Yuli Zhang; Huaiyu Wu; Lei Cheng (June 2012).Some new deformation formulas about variance and covariance. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control(ICMIC2012). pp. 987–992.
^Navidi, William (2006).Statistics for Engineers and Scientists. McGraw-Hill. p. 14.
^Montgomery, D. C. and Runger, G. C. (1994)Applied statistics and probability for engineers, page 201. John Wiley & Sons New York
^Yuli Zhang; Huaiyu Wu; Lei Cheng (June 2012).Some new deformation formulas about variance and covariance. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control(ICMIC2012). pp. 987–992.
^Knight, K. (2000).Mathematical Statistics. New York: Chapman and Hall. proposition 2.11.
^Casella, George; Berger, Roger L. (2002).Statistical Inference (2nd ed.). Example 7.3.3, p. 331.ISBN0-534-24312-6.
^Mood, A. M., Graybill, F. A., and Boes, D.C. (1974)Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 229
^Kenney, John F.; Keeping, E.S. (1951).Mathematics of Statistics. Part Two(PDF) (2nd ed.). Princeton, New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on Nov 17, 2018 – via KrishiKosh.
^Sharma, R. (2008). "Some more inequalities for arithmetic mean, harmonic mean and variance".Journal of Mathematical Inequalities.2 (1):109–114.CiteSeerX10.1.1.551.9397.doi:10.7153/jmi-02-11.