 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Variable-incidence wing" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(November 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
.jpg)
Avariable-incidence wing has an adjustableangle of incidence relative to itsfuselage. This allows the wing to operate at a highangle of attack for take-off and landing while allowing the fuselage to remain close to horizontal.[1]
The pivot mechanism adds extra weight over a conventional wing and increases costs, but in some applications the benefits can outweigh the costs.
Several examples have flown, with one, theF-8 Crusader carrier-borne jet fighter, entering production.
Some early aeroplanes had wings which could be varied in incidence for control and trim, in place of conventionalelevator control surfaces.Wing warping varied the incidence of the outer wing and was used by several pioneers, including initially theWright brothers.
Early examples of rigid variable-incidence wings were not particularly successful. They include theMulliner Knyplane in 1911, theRatmanoff monoplane in 1913 and the PaulSchmidt biplane, also in 1913.[2] A patent for a rigid variable-incidence wing was lodged in France on 20 May 1912 byBulgarian inventor George Boginoff.[3] It is believed that four unsuccessful Russian types were built between 1916 and 1917.[4] TheZerbe Air Sedan was a tandemquadruplane which flew only once, in 1921.
The first example to be made in any quantity was the French tandem-wingMignet Pou du Ciel (Flying Flea), which became briefly popular during the 1930s. It had a variable-incidence forewing which proved unsafe, and sales were discontinued following a series of fatal crashes.
During World War II, the German companyBlohm & Voss developed the variable-incidence monoplane to provide increased lift at takeoff, where the rear fuselage was too close to the ground to allow rotation of the whole aircraft.[5] The fuselage of theBV 144 prototype transport sat low on a short undercarriage, allowing passengers to go on and off without the need for additional steps. Another proposal by B&V, theP 193 attack aircraft, was ofpusher configuration and could not rotate its fuselage for takeoff without the propeller fouling the ground, so it was given a variable-incidence wing.[6] Russian designer S. G. Kozlov designed the E1 variable-incidence fighter, but the unfinished prototype was destroyed when the factory was overrun by Germany in 1941.[4]
Carrier-borne aircraft must have good forward visibility during the descent and approach for a deck landing. Without a variable-incidence wing (or otherhigh-lift device), the pilot must pitch up the entire aircraft to maintainlift at the slow approach speed required, and this can restrict forward vision. By increasing the incidence of the wing but not the fuselage, both high lift and good forward vision can be maintained. The device also avoids the need for a long, bulky and heavy nose undercarriage to raise the angle of attack at takeoff. TheSupermarine Type 322 prototype flew in 1943, and theSeagull ASR.1 amphibian flying boat in 1948.[2]
After the war the USA revisited the idea for the jet age. TheMartin XB-51 bomber and theRepublic XF-91 interceptor adopted variable incidence for much the same reason as B&V. Both first flew in 1949, but only a handful of prototypes of either was built. They were followed in 1955 by theVought F-8 Crusader carrier-borne jet fighter, the only variable-incidence type to go into production and enjoy a successful service career.